The last time I came here, I promised myself I’d rather bite through my own tongue than set foot on this property again.
At the time, I meant it.
Apparently, fourteen years is long enough for a promise to become negotiable.
I park on the gravel shoulder because I can’t bring myself to drive under the archway. The iron gates stand open. Above them, ST. BRIGID’S is picked out in black serif letters.
I shut off the engine and sit with my hands on the steering wheel, listening to the soft ticking of the cooling car. There’s a faint smell of sea-salt and wet pine. My throat remembers the taste of institutional tea. That bitter, brown lie they serve you to teach you compliance.
In my lap is a manila folder—cheap, thin, corners already crumpled from my grip. The hospital’s crest is printed in blue, too bright for what it contains. The folder is the reason I’m here. It has my name on it in block letters.
VAN DIJK, LEA.
Like I’m a parcel to be claimed.
I open the folder again. The paper hasn’t changed. The letter is short. Formal. Almost polite. It informs me that my father’s personal effects are being held at St. Brigid’s and that, as next of kin, I’m required to collect them within fourteen days.
Required.
Apparently, the deadline is a favor.
My father hasn’t been my father in fourteen years, but bureaucracy doesn’t have a checkbox for “emotionally deceased.” It just has boxes for signatures and liability.
I fold the letter, put it back, and force my fingers to unclench. Beyond the archway, the white building sits on the hill. Three stories. Symmetrical. Windows too evenly spaced. Curtains drawn to the same height, as if privacy can be standardized.
I get out of the car. The gravel crunches under my shoes—loud, rude. I take the folder with me. Inside the archway, there’s a thin strip of asphalt lined with hedges clipped into submission. I remember those hedges. I remember tracing one leaf with my thumbnail, every morning, telling myself that if I can feel something small, I must still be a human being.
I didn’t come here to be a person. I came here to collect my father’s watch and his wallet and the last scraps of whatever story he left behind. That’s all. That’s what I tell myself as the building grows larger.
The front doors are glass and steel now. Modern. Updated. Like they’ve replaced the bars with a better kind of lie. A camera blinks above the entrance.
I can’t help it—I look straight at it.
Still, my skin tightens under its gaze.
Inside, the foyer smells like disinfectant and stale lilies. Somewhere, a fluorescent light buzzes on a frequency that feels personal. The floor is polished to the point of reflection. I see my own shoes approaching. I see my own hesitation, pressed flat under glass.
At the reception desk, a young man in a grey cardigan looks up. He has the kind of face that believes in policy.
“Can I help you?”
His voice is neutral. Polished. Trained.
“I’m here for my father’s personal effects,” I say. My own voice comes out calm. Too calm. It’s the calm I learned here.
He smiles the way you smile at someone who might be a problem. “Name please?”
I slide the folder across the counter. The man doesn’t touch it right away. He reads the name twice before looking up.
“Lea van Dijk.”
His eyes flick to my face, then to the letterhead. Something in his posture shifts, small and involuntary. “One moment,” he says, and he disappears through a door marked STAFF ONLY.
I stand there, hands empty now, and the emptiness makes my fingers twitch.
To the left is a corridor with soft beige walls. There’s a framed poster about mindfulness. A bowl of individually wrapped mints. Nothing sharp. Nothing heavy. Nothing you could use to prove you were in pain. The young man returns with a woman in her fifties wearing a navy blazer and a lanyard. Her hair is pinned back with efficient aggression. She has the kind of smile that never reaches her eyes.
“Ms. van Dijk,” she says, like my name is a formality, like I’m an administrative task. “I’m Miriam De Smet. I’m the coordinator.”
Of course she is.
She gestures for me to follow her. “Come with me. We have your father’s things secured.”
As we walk, the air changes. It gets cooler. The corridor narrows. The building’s polite mask thins. Doors line the hallway, all identical, each with a small window set too high to offer anything but a glimpse of ceiling. Behind one door, someone laughs too loudly. Behind another, someone is singing under their breath.
Ordinary is how St. Brigid’s does harm.
We pass a door with a keypad. I notice the keypad before I notice the number.
12.
My stomach drops in a neat, controlled way. Like an elevator.
Miriam doesn’t slow down. She doesn’t glance at the number. She either doesn’t know or she doesn’t care.
Room 12 was where they kept me the longest, when I wouldn’t recant. I can still feel the vinyl chair under my thighs. The way it stuck to skin when you sweated. The way the armrests were too wide, forcing your body into a posture of openness you didn’t feel.
We stop at a storage room at the end of the hall. Miriam unlocks it with a key that hangs from her lanyard. The key ring jingles softly.
Inside the room, there’s a metal table. On it sits a clear plastic box with a lid. My father’s name is written on a label in black marker.
HENRI VAN DIJK.
My mouth goes dry.
Miriam places the box on the table like she’s setting down groceries. “We inventoried everything. You’ll need to sign.” She slides a form toward me with a cheap pen attached by a thick chain.
My eyes flick to the box. Inside: a leather wallet, scuffed at the corners; a set of keys; a gold wedding band; a rosary; and an envelope, cream-colored, unsealed, with my name written on it in my father’s handwriting.
My chest tightens around that handwriting.
It’s neat. Steady. Patient. Exactly as I remember it.
I reach for the envelope, then stop. I don’t want to touch it yet.
“What happened?” I ask, and I hate that my voice sounds like it wants a story.
Miriam’s smile shifts into something practiced. “He died in his sleep.”
“Here?”
“He was a volunteer chaplain. He had a room on the third floor.” She says it as if it’s honorable.
Chaplain.
The word hits like a joke told in church.
I don’t ask why he came back here. I don’t ask why this place welcomed him. I already know the answer to both: people like my father are always welcomed. They keep the system looking respectable.
I sign the form without reading it. My signature comes out firm. I’ve signed enough things in my life to know the ink doesn’t care what you feel.
Miriam nods, satisfied. “You can take the box.”
“And the envelope?”
“Yes. It’s addressed to you.”
I lift the lid. The plastic squeaks softly. I pick up the envelope first.
It feels like it holds one sheet. Maybe two.
Miriam watches me.
“Do you need a private room?” she asks, suddenly gentle.
“I’ll manage,” I say. I take the box with my other hand. The plastic is cold against my palm. My father’s keys clink together in a sound so familiar it almost makes me laugh.
Outside, the sky is the color of wet paper. The hedges stand in line. The gates remain politely open.
I pass Room 12’s corridor without looking down it.
In the car, I set the box on the passenger seat and place the envelope on top.
I start the engine and drive out through the gates because now that I’ve come this far, I’m done being dramatic. Dramatic is what they called me. Dramatic. Disturbed. Attention-seeking. Over-imaginative.
I pull into a small lay-by a kilometer down the hill where the road meets a line of trees. I turn off the engine again. My fingers hover over the envelope.
I could throw it out the window and never open it.
Instead, I tear it open with the blunt impatience of someone who knows restraint has never protected her.
Inside is one sheet of paper.
Not a letter. Not an apology.
A photocopy.
At the top, in bold: ST. BRIGID’S PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY — INCIDENT REPORT
My eyes race down the page until I find my own name halfway down.
Halfway down, I find it.
Patient: VAN DIJK, LEA. Incident: Attempted self-harm. Object: Metal spoon, broken. Location: Room 12. Staff involved: H. VAN DIJK (volunteer chaplain), M. DE SMET (coordinator).
The page goes slightly out of focus. My breath becomes a thin line. Attempted self-harm.
Metal spoon.
Room 12.
I keep reading, because my brain has always been cruelly obedient to text.
The report details an “episode.” It describes me as “agitated,” “delusional,” “paranoid.” It notes that I “made false allegations of familial abuse.” It records that Chaplain van Dijk “de-escalated the situation with spiritual reassurance” and that Coordinator De Smet “observed improved compliance afterward.”
Improved compliance.
As if compliance is health.
At the bottom is a signature block.
Signature: Lea van Dijk
My own name.
My own signature.
The ink looks like mine. The curve of the L, the aggressive slash through the D.
Except I don’t remember signing this.
I don’t remember a spoon.
I remember a cup. A plastic cup that tasted like soap. I remember a chair. I remember being told, very gently, that memory is unreliable. That trauma creates fantasies. That people in distress misinterpret kindness.
I remember how often kindness meant I was expected to stop arguing.
My eyes flick to the plastic box again. The keys. The ring. The rosary. The empty envelope.
This photocopy is not a last message. It’s evidence. It’s a reminder. It’s leverage, even after death.
My father wasn’t just collecting salvation points as a chaplain. He was making sure I couldn’t tell the truth without being “proven” unstable.
I fold the paper. The fold is sharp. Then I unfold it again and read it more slowly, like I’m searching for a seam.
That’s when I notice something else.
In the staff line, there’s a date.
Incident date: 12 March 2026.
I blink. Hard.
March 2026.
That’s not fourteen years ago.
That’s next month.
I look at the paper again, then at my phone on the dashboard.
Today’s date, in the corner: 13 Feb 2026.
My skin prickles, not with memory this time, but with something colder.
A typo? Not with something this specific.
I pick up the plastic box and rummage through it. The keys clink. I open the wallet. Inside is my father’s ID card. Behind it is a visitor badge.
ST. BRIGID’S — VOLUNTEER CHAPLAIN Valid from: 01 March 2026
My heart stutters.
Valid from March 2026.
My father is apparently dead—according to Miriam.
But his badge hasn’t even started yet.
I sit back slowly.
Miriam De Smet. The coordinator. She was listed on the report.
March 2026.
Room 12.
Improved compliance.
I stare at the paper again, and I realize the photocopy isn’t aged. The edges aren’t yellow. The toner is crisp. Fresh.
Someone printed this recently, put it in an envelope addressed in my father’s handwriting, and invited me back here.
This wasn’t a death notice.
It was a summons.
I think of Room 12. Miriam’s smile. Her question about a private room.
It wasn’t compassion. It was preparation.
A memory surfaces from last week: a voicemail from an unknown number. I’d deleted it without listening. I retrieve it now.
I press play.
Static. Then a woman’s voice. Controlled. Friendly.
“Ms. van Dijk, this is Miriam De Smet from St. Brigid’s. We’re calling to confirm your attendance for your review meeting on March 12th. It’s important you arrive on time. Your cooperation is appreciated.”
Review meeting.
Attendance. Cooperation.
Appreciated.
My father isn’t dead.
They needed me to believe he was, because grief makes you return. Grief makes you sign without reading.
And I signed.
I signed for his “effects.” I signed my name on a document I didn’t read.
My signature is now attached to something. Consent. Acceptance. Agreement.
First comes calculation.
I look at the road. Empty. Wet. Grey.
I look at the gates in my mind. Open. Polite.
Then I look at the paper again and notice a small line under the incident report header.
Patient status: Voluntary.
Voluntary.
The word is obscene.
My father always loved that kind of framing. He didn’t hit; he “restrained.” He didn’t threaten; he “worried.” He didn’t silence; he “protected.” He didn’t ruin me; I “spiraled.”
The folder in my lap isn’t just paper. It tells them which version of me they expect to get.
I reach into the box again and take out the keys. There are three on the ring, and one fob: a small grey tag with St. Brigid’s logo.
A staff key.
I turn the key tag over. On the back, in tiny stamped letters, there’s a number.
12.
My stomach flips, not with fear, but with something closer to fury.
They sent me access.
They want me inside that room again so they can say, See? She came back. She always comes back.
I stare at the key until the edges of it blur.
Then, slowly, I place the incident report on the dashboard, flattening it with my palm. I take the pen from my glove compartment. It’s not chained. It’s mine.
I flip the report over and write on the back in block letters, neat and steady—my father’s handwriting, if I’m honest, without the indulgent loops.
YOU’RE USING THE WRONG ROOM.
I pause. My hand hovers.
Then I add:
YOU TAUGHT ME THAT PAPER IS STRONGER THAN SCREAMING.
My fingers are steady.
I pick up my phone and open the camera. I photograph the report, the date, the staff names, the “voluntary” status, the key tag, and the form I signed. Everything.
Then I open my contacts, scroll to a name I haven’t touched in years.
SASKIA — LEGAL AID
The old voice rises: Don’t make trouble. Don’t be dramatic.
Then I hit call.
It rings once. Twice. Saskia’s voice comes on, wary, because it’s me.
“Lea?”
“It’s happening again,” I say.
“What’s happening?”
I look at the St. Brigid’s key in my hand. I let it hang from my fingers like a pendulum.
“They’re trying to bring me back,” I say. “And this time they put it in writing.”
There’s a silence on the line.
“Where are you?”
“I’m on the road below the gates,” I say. “I’ve got documents. A date. A key.”
“A key?”
“Yes,” I say. “To Room 12.”
Another pause. Then, quietly: “Do not go back in there alone.”
“I’m not going in,” I say. Not like before. Not on their terms.
Saskia exhales. “Send me the photos. Now.”
“I will.”
“And Lea,” she says, her voice sharpening. “If the date says March 2026—”
“I know.”
“This isn’t about your father’s things,” she says.
“No,” I say, staring at the key. “It’s about mine.”
I end the call.
Then I take the St. Brigid’s key tag off the ring.
I slide the tag free and open the window.
Cold air rushes in.
I hold the tag out for a moment.
Then I toss it into the ditch where the grass is dark and thick and waiting. It disappears into the grass.
No drama.
No ceremony.
Just removal.
I close the window.
I start the car.
And instead of driving away from St. Brigid’s like I did last time—shaking, ashamed, convinced I’d lost—I make a clean U-turn and drive toward the gates again.
Not to return.
To enter.
There’s a difference, and it matters.
This time, I’m not walking back in to be rewritten. I’m going back with my own paper, my own photos, my own proof.
As the iron archway rises in front of me, ST. BRIGID’S written overhead in its trusting little serif font, the trick finally looks simple.
The gates are open.
I drive through anyway, slowly, deliberately, like I’m the one choosing what happens next.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
This is truly wonderful, in a "this-makes-my-whole-body-itch" sort of way. Really creepy.
The story, start-to-finish, is beautifully constructed; the way you drop new hints along the story arc pulled me along, much as I didn't want to (wait for it) go back into Room 12...
Along with the strong story-telling, you've got lovely imagery in here--"sky the color of wet paper", and many others other comments have noted.
Thanks for this!
Reply
Thank you very much for such a wonderful comment Richard!
Reply
“Fourteen years is enough time for a promise to become negotiable.”
Fantastic line. You dive into a real “mind F” of a story here. The narrator flips to possibly unreliable in a split second. I’ll admit the incident report confused me a bit as to as to what was going on as you don’t really start with those elements until the end but it’s still genuinely disorienting. You leaves us with a lot to think about, that is the hallmark of a good story.
Reply
A “mind F” is pretty much the reaction I was hoping for, so I’ll happily take that. I’m glad that opening line landed, too. And yes, the disorientation around the incident report is intentional. I wanted it to feel wrong before the reader could quite explain why — Lea is only beginning to understand what she has been participating in herself.
Reply
Interesting. Would this be the beginning of something bigger?
Reply
I'm not sure. Some other readers have asked me the same.
Exactly one year ago, I started writing. Prompts under time pressure — ten minutes, for instance. The results were sometimes not too bad. I wrote instinctively.
At the time, writing a story between 1,000 and 3,000 words was absolutely something I refused to do. And here I am, writing my 43rd story of at least a thousand words.
Maybe my (hopefully improving) skills and inspiration might lead to a sequel.
An extremely long answer to a perfectly normal question.
Reply
You do tend to drop stories quick. And they are always impressive especially so considering the time restraints you put on yourself. I have written a lot of my stories pretty fast as well, though I end up getting self conscious about it when I go too fast. One of the big things I’ve been working on is just creating my story without worrying if I’m holding up some imaginary standard of “being a real author”.
Reply
Your last sentence really says it all, and I think it’s a healthy way of looking at it. Don’t put too much pressure on yourself to meet some imaginary standard of what a “real author” should be. Write because you enjoy it.
My time restraints actually go back to when I first started, when I’d try to get something onto the page in 10–15 minutes. Those were usually 300–400 words and, frankly, mostly complete nonsense. 😄
For a short story of at least 1,000 words that has actually been thought through, that’s simply impossible. Before I consider a story good enough to submit, it usually goes through somewhere between four and eight different versions. And probably about half of my story concepts end up unceremoniously tossed into the digital shredder.
That’s easy for me to say, though, because I literally have all the time in the world to devote to writing and commenting. Unfortunately, MS forced me to give up my career.
Keep up the good spirit!
---MG
Reply
The institutional details were so effective in giving me an unsettling feeling—the standardized curtains, the chained pen, and the polished language about compliance (chef’s kiss). I loved that Lea recognized paperwork could become her weapon rather than theirs. Driving back through the gates by choice made for a very satisfying final image.
Reply
The chained pen had one job: keep everyone compliant. Lea apparently took that personally. I’m glad the drive back through the gates landed too — by then, I wanted the same system that had reduced her to paperwork to have to deal with her returning on her own terms.
Reply
I really got pulled into this. The slow build of tension is so well done, especially the moment she notices the date on the incident report — that hit in such a quiet, devastating way. Lea’s voice feels incredibly real throughout; the mix of sharp observation and buried emotion makes every detail land harder than you expect. And the ending really stuck with me. It’s not loud or dramatic, just this steady shift where she decides she’s not walking back in as the person they expect. That choice felt powerful in a very grounded way. Really strong piece :)
Reply
Thank you, M, very kind of you.
I need — or rather, want — to admit something: when I was rereading and fine-tuning this story, even I felt a little unsettled when I came to the document dated in the future, with “voluntary” next to Lea’s signature. That sounds crazy, right?
A few years ago, an incredible number of things went wrong in the treatment of my MS at a rehabilitation clinic. And in both cases — mine and Lea’s — it wasn’t simply a matter of mistakes. There was deliberate wrongdoing involved, which makes it much worse.
Maybe that’s why that part hit me when I reread it.
Reply
Thank you for sharing that — I’m really sorry you went through something like that. It doesn’t sound crazy at all. I think that’s part of why the moment in your story lands so powerfully: it’s written with the kind of clarity that only comes from someone who’s seen the real-world version of that fear and confusion.
Some of my own pieces have ended up mirroring things I’ve lived through, and it’s always surprising how strongly those moments can hit when you come back to them. Writing’s been one of the best ways for me to process things, so I completely understand what you mean — sometimes the truth finds its way onto the page before you realise it.
I’m glad you trusted the story enough to let that truth sit inside it. It gives Lea’s experience a weight that really stays with the reader. And I hope you’re in a better place now than you were then.
Reply
Hi Marjolein,
thank you for sharing Lea's story. The description of the institution and people working there was so vivid and creepy at the same time. "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here"...
Reply
Lots of creepy things can happen with something as boring as paperwork.
How often do we simply sign a form without really reading it? I'm a lawyer, so I always at least scan what I'm signing, but I suspect most people don't.
The same thing happens in our digital lives. Every time we simply click “agree” on whatever cookie notice pops up, we may be agreeing to far more than we realize.
Reply
You’ve got a strong psychological thriller here. The whole St. Brigid’s setup works because nothing is evil. It’s all clean hallways, polite smiles, forms, signatures, words like “voluntary” and “cooperation.” That makes it way creepier than if everyone was threatening her. Lea’s voice is my favorite part. Lines like “bureaucracy doesn’t have a checkbox for emotionally deceased” and “Ordinary is how St. Brigid’s does harm” tell you who she is without stopping to explain her whole backstory. The bitterness and dark humor feel natural. The future date reveal is also good. That was the moment where the story changed for me. Up until then, I thought this was about Lea being forced to confront what happened to her. Then there’s an incident report describing something that hasn’t even happened yet, and now I want to know what the hell St. Brigid’s is planning. There are lines I wouldn’t touch. “Improved compliance. As if compliance is health.” is great. “Nothing sharp. Nothing heavy. Nothing you could use to prove you were in pain.” is brutal. And “YOU TAUGHT ME THAT PAPER IS STRONGER THAN SCREAMING” feels like the whole story in one sentence. I think the story gets stronger if you explain less. You already gave us the creepy pieces. Trust them. The question I want stuck in my head at the end is- How does St. Brigid’s already have a report describing something Lea does next month, and why the hell does it already have her signature on it?
Reply
You know me far too well by now. 😂 I’m usually the one yelling “trust the reader,” so of course you found the exact few places where I apparently forgot my own rule. And yes — you’re right. The question I want left hanging is exactly how St. Brigid’s already has that report, and how Lea’s signature can possibly be on it. I’m not touching the story tonight, but this is absolutely going into the next edit. Also: “trust the creepy pieces” may have to become a permanent editing note.
Reply
This story is just beautiful! Once again amazing work✨!
Reply
Tnx Aether, for your kind words.
Reply
This was a delicious read! You did a great job building the tension and holding it. It really drew me in, and the suspense was wonderful. The pay-off at the end was great too, and really makes me want to know what is going to happen to Lea next now that she's decided to take action.
Reply
I'm glad you liked it. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment.
What's going to happen to Lea?
I'm not sure yet, but I guess Miriam and her father will have a hard time when Lea confronts them.
Reply
Hello Marjolein,
I'm so glad I got back and this was the first story I decided to read. This was nice in many ways. The way manipulation is weaved to the point we don't know what we can consider is real or not. I feel like where I felt strongest was when she realized the dates. How she knew she was being played and no matter what she would do, she would go back there. Maybe to prove their point, most certainly to prove what she needed to do. There was something about the report, will the incident with the spoon act as an instruction or is it something like they have seen the future, that stroke me fancy and I wasn't sure where I could put it. This was really nice an I can't tell how much I loved everything about it. Thank you for the story.
Reply
Thank you! I love that the future-dated report left you wondering whether it was an instruction, a prediction, or something else entirely. I deliberately didn’t want to answer that question — I think it becomes much more unsettling when Lea, and the reader, can no longer tell exactly what is real or how much of it has already been decided for her. And yes, she does go back — but this time she literally returns the point of no return. 😊
And I’m honoured that my story was first on your reading list. 😊
Reply
This and your previous story are so foreboding, so emotionally claustrophobic. Both stories have a dystopian feel about them -- about some possible nightmarish future rife with mind control and layers of deception -- of institutionalized uncertainty. The sensory involvements in this are stunning and oh so real. You put mere there, in the scene. Incredible work!
Reply
“Institutionalized uncertainty” — that’s such an interesting way of looking at both stories. I hadn’t consciously thought of them that way while writing them, but I can definitely see the connection now that you point it out. Thank you for such a thoughtful comment!
Reply
Who can possibly not read a story that starts with, “I’d rather bite through my own tongue than set foot on that property again.” while vivid imagery like”the air smelled of disinfectant and lilies” and “the receptionist had the kind of face that believed in policy” will keep me hooked, line-after-line. A pleasure, as always. -M
Reply
Thanks, M! I’m especially happy that the opening line pulled you straight in — and that the rest of the story managed to keep you there. Your comments are always such a pleasure to read.
Reply
There was a sense of foreboding right from the beginning in this story. All of the elements, the incident report dated in the future, a form that she had signed without realising, the key to room 12, the ID fob that hadn’t started yet, the visitors badge…all very creepy and spine tingling. I wouldn’t want to go back in there! Excellent work Marjolein as ever!
Reply
Hi Louis,
I really appreciate that you took the time and effort to read and comment on this story so closely. I have to admit, writing it gave me a slightly creepy feeling at times too. 😄
Reply
I love reading your stories Marjolein!. I meant to say before how your short sentences really whacked the pace along at 100 miles an hour! Short, sharp sentences really capture the mood and the suspense and keep you hooked throughout. Brilliant!
Reply
Really nice. I liked how you mentioned 'I signed the form without reading it'- didn't check what is was that she was signing for. It's what most of us do all the time. We sign things and read them later, if at all.
I also really like how you give backstory in your stories. Sometimes in my writing I'm tempted to do an information dump, but nobody likes to read that. I do my best to do an approach similar to yours, in that you add different things throughout the story making the reader guess and become invested in the backstory. The fact, though, that you make the ending so satisfying without divulging all the backstory is something I aspire to. At the end of your stories I'm content to know that I will never know all the backstory. Do you ever do sequels to your stories? They almost seem set up for a sequel.
Reply
Thank you so much for this. I especially love what you said about being content not knowing the entire backstory, because that’s very close to how I like to write. I’d rather give readers enough pieces to build their own picture than explain everything for them. And yes, resisting the information dump can be hard. 😂
I rarely write sequels, actually. I often deliberately leave parts of the world or the characters’ history unexplained. But you’re not the first person to ask me about sequels lately, so perhaps I should stop being so stubborn about it. 😄
Reply
An eerie and gripping concept, could totally see this as a crime show! I enjoyed the slow reveal of who her dad was/is, the actual location, and her past.
Random sentence I loved; "bureaucracy doesn’t have a checkbox for “emotionally deceased""
Reply
Thanks, Korinne. Your words mean a lot to me. I love that you picked out that line because I had so much fun writing it.
Reply
Brilliant! This one has a real Shutter Island feel to it, which is about the best compliment I can pay someone since I think Dennis Lehane is genius. The subtle details and gradual unfolding are fantastic world building. Lea's motivations and emotions are powerful and clear. I love stories that use fine details, like the dates, to unsettle the reader. It's effective here and well done.
Reply
Wow, the Shutter Island comparison is one I’ll happily take! Dennis Lehane sets the bar pretty high. 😄 I’m especially glad you mentioned the dates, because I wanted those small details to do some of the unsettling before Lea — and hopefully the reader — fully realizes what’s wrong. Thank you for such a thoughtful comment!
Reply
The gaslighting, manipulation, tarnishing credibility, weaponizing trauma history, and entrapment... These are nightmare fuel. I commend Lea's bravery and sharpness in heading back to ST. BRIGID'S to face her past. Powerful, gripping story. Thank you for sharing, Marjolein!
Reply
Thank you Akihiro! You’ve pretty much captured the entire nightmare of St. Brigid’s in that first sentence. 😄 I’m especially glad you mentioned Lea going back, because for me that was important: she isn’t returning because she has suddenly stopped being afraid, but because this time she understands what she’s walking into. So she literally returns the point of no return. 😄
Reply
Incredible storytelling. We might not be in the same shoes as Lea, but life could certainly feel like THIS many times over. "Only way out, is THROUGH..."
Reply
The "ticking of the cooling car," "bitter, brown lie" of institutional tea, the smell of "disinfectant and stale lilies," and the gravel crunches that feel "loud, rude"-brilliant sensory cues that built the tension. You managed to build the curiosity right up to the time-bending/conspiracy thriller twist with the post-dated incident report (March 2026). The psychological hook for the protagonist (signing her own consent form...) was very effective. I felt there might have been too many expository explanations from the narrator that the reader could've inferred. Once again, thanks so much for a great read.
Reply
Thank you! I love that you picked out those sensory details — especially the “bitter, brown lie.” I had fun with that one. 😄 And I appreciate the note about the expository explanations. I’ll keep an eye on that when I revisit the story; I’m definitely in favor of making the reader do some of the work. Thanks for such a close read!
Reply
Marjolein- the opener. I was JUST reading a quote that echoed something along those lines- but I think it was "I'd rather cut off my own hand than reach for you again." Looking back bites (pun intended).
Wow, the characterization of this institution and Lea's manipulative, abusive father is so deep. It's no wonder the place has a pull on Lea, despite her avowal never to return. I don't know if I like that she made that u-turn through the gates. I'm that person in the theater showing a scary movie that shouts "don't go into the basement!"
It's absolutely necessary for the narrative, though- in order to free herself from the trap, she has to face it. There's nothing "voluntary" about her treatment in the past, and her consent ends now. Powerfully written, magnetic!
Reply
I laughed at the image of you shouting “don’t go into the basement!” because that’s pretty much exactly what I wanted that U-turn to feel like. 😂 Everything in you should be telling Lea to keep driving. But you nailed why she doesn’t: leaving St. Brigid’s wasn’t enough to free herself from it. This time she goes back knowing what they did, and knowing that “voluntary” is a word they can no longer define for her. I love your final line about her consent ending now. Thank you!
Reply
Woah-- AMAZING! I promise I'm going to be back soon, maybe this week, certainly next! Good to see you, Marjolein!
Reply
I’m looking forward to it! I’m not going anywhere. 😄❤️🤗 See you back here soon! 😊
Reply
Now this was creepy for me in many ways. The way the St. Brigid’s rewrites actual abuse with words like “compliance,” “voluntary,” and “improved” is frightening. The future‑dated report would have had me running, which made me love the ending even more. I love that she’s going back and leaving on her own terms, with her own evidence and her own voice!! Great story as always. :).
Reply
Thanks, Iz! I especially like that you picked up on the language St. Brigid’s uses to rewrite what actually happened to Lea. That was an important part of the story for me: if you change the words, you can make almost anything look acceptable on paper. And yes, every sensible instinct says RUN when she sees that future-dated report. 😂 But that’s exactly why she turns the car around. This time she gets to decide what “voluntary” means — and quite literally returns the point of no return. Thank you for such a thoughtful read!
Reply
That "Voluntary" checkbox on a pre-dated intake form is easily the creepiest piece of administrative horror I've read on here. The realization about the visitor badge date was an absolute gut-punch.
Reply
I’m delighted those two details got you. 😄 There’s something uniquely sinister about bureaucracy when nothing looks sinister at all — just a checkbox, a date, a perfectly ordinary form quietly telling a very different story. “Administrative horror” may be my new favourite description of this one. Thank you!
Reply
I liked that Lea finally came to taking control on her own terms. We all have been in a position where people like Miriam are on their own power trip and try to manipulate others. You made Lea's relationship with her father a complex one. She finally broke free, 14 years was long enough.
Reply
Fourteen years was definitely long enough! 😄 I enjoyed reading your take on Lea, especially that you saw her relationship with her father as such an important part of it. Thanks for coming along for the ride!
Reply
I really enjoyed Lea's internal monologue. The honesty, vulnerability, and sharpness of her inner voice brought her character to life and made her struggles feel immediate and real. The way you wove her memories, doubts, and observations into the narrative was really powerful.
I also liked the psychological tension. I could feel Lea’s anxiety and unease build with each new detail and interaction. I liked how you slowly revealed her suspicions and the growing sense that something was amiss. The tension was never forced; instead, it arose naturally from her thoughts, memories, and the subtle threats embedded in ordinary moments.
The way you explored themes of control, compliance, and resistance was powerful. I liked how you illustrated how institutions can manipulate reality through paperwork and how that shaped Lea’s experience.
The ending was satisfying and powerful. I appreciated how Lea’s decision to re-enter on her own terms, equipped with knowledge and support, signified a definitive move from being controlled to reclaiming her control over her own choices. Great work, as always!
Reply
You always look under the floorboards of my stories, and I love that. 😄 Lea gave me plenty of room to play with what we accept as reality when the people and systems around us keep supplying the “facts.” I’m especially pleased the tension worked without needing anything overtly threatening. Thank you for giving this one such a close read — as you always do. ❤️
Reply
You're very welcome. I really appreciate you sharing your stories.
Reply
Absolutely brilliant. :)
Reply
Thanks!
Reply
Great atmosphere! The hospital feels so vivid. But to be honest I'm a bit confused about what's going on? I've read it twice. Is this like Shutter Island? She's always been a patient this whole time? If not it opens up a few small things plot wise for me. If the father is simply a volunteer chaplain? Why would an entire institution risk losing medical licenses to protect a child abusing volunteer? And the future date, if they are working an angle to have her commited again saying she self harmed and using pre dated forms to build evidence, why would they send her out of the institution with that proof? If I were an evil hospital admin I'd have her sign 2 of each form 1 for her to have, and 1 for hospital records. She'd leave with mundane nonsense forms and I'd keep the proof. But it's very likely I am missing something.
Reply
You’re not missing something obvious — I think you may just be interpreting a few of the clues through a more conventional cover-up scenario than I intended. 😄 Lea has been a patient there before, but this isn’t a *Shutter Island* situation, and the institution’s involvement isn’t simply about protecting one volunteer chaplain.
The future-dated incident report is deliberately strange, though. The fact that she is allowed to leave with it matters; if it were merely evidence they wanted to manufacture and hide away in her file, your objection would be absolutely right. Its purpose is something rather different, and Lea herself only begins to understand that at the end.
So the disorientation is intentional — I just don’t want to explain away the part I’d rather leave for the reader to piece together.
Reply
Ah, figured I was missing a deeper layer, I'm not really good with picking up that sort of stuff. It's why my stories end up being pretty straight forward I guess.
Reply