The First Meal

Fiction Science Fiction Speculative

Written in response to: "Write a story with an unreliable narrator or character." as part of Not What It Seems.

The first thing they taught me was how to swallow. Not because I had forgotten. Because nobody could prove I remembered. Apparently there was a difference.

The woman across the table smiled with professional optimism — the kind that had survived too many disappointed people to belong to her anymore.

"Take your time."

Between us sat a porcelain bowl filled with clear broth. Steam drifted toward the ceiling. No garnish. No color. No ambition.

The first meal, I would later learn, was always forgettable.

I reached for the spoon. Three silhouettes behind the observation window leaned forward in perfect synchrony.

"They're subtle," I said.

The woman's smile widened by exactly half a centimeter. "They're observing."

"I assumed they were deciding whether I'd make it to dessert."

Humor apparently was measurable.

The brochure had promised a seamless transition. No trauma. No painful memories. No legal complications. That last promise bothered me more than the others. People only advertised the absence of legal complications when they expected questions about legality.

Useful things had survived. I knew how to tie a tie. How to recognize the smell of rain before it arrived. How to tell when someone was pretending to listen. I knew octopuses had three hearts. I knew the capital of Peru. I even remembered every word of the second verse of Bohemian Rhapsody.

Yet when I searched for my mother's face, there was only static — the same static, I noticed, that filled the half-second before the intercom crackled to life. As though whatever had been taken had left the same texture behind as whatever was watching me now.

The company called the procedure Selective Continuity. The protesters preferred identity laundering. Marketing departments almost always won those arguments.

I lifted the spoon. The broth tasted of chicken, pepper, and childhood — not childhood itself, just the outline of it. A hand. Warm fingers around mine. Someone blowing gently across a spoon before holding it beneath my lips. A laugh. Gone. It disappeared before I could decide whether it belonged to me.

I swallowed. Another note behind the glass.

"Congratulations," the woman said.

"For what?"

"You've completed Phase One."

"I've eaten soup."

"Most people don't see the distinction."

"I sincerely hope your promotion doesn't depend on that sentence."

She laughed. A real one this time. Small. Unexpected. The only unscripted thing that had happened all morning.

"How do you feel?" she asked.

"I suspect there's a preferred answer."

"There isn't."

"Then..." I considered it. "...underwhelmed."

She blinked. "I expected terror. An existential crisis. A dramatic confrontation with the meaning of life."

"And instead?"

"They served soup."

Room Fourteen contained one chair too many. Mine. Everything else had already been decided.

Six identical shirts. Six identical pairs of trousers. Shoes polished to a military shine. Fresh towels. An empty wardrobe. No books. No photographs. No watch. No telephone. Most noticeably — no mirrors.

On the bedside table lay a printed card.

Congratulations on your transition. Reflective surfaces remain unavailable for the initial seventy-two hours.

That was the one sentence all day that actually frightened me. Not because mirrors were forbidden. Because somebody already knew I would ask for one.

Dinner arrived at six. Exactly. Institutions loved exactness. It gave uncertainty somewhere to hide.

The nurse placed the tray on the table and wished me an enjoyable meal, with the detached kindness of someone who had repeated the sentence too many times to mean it. As she reached the door, I spoke.

"Has anyone ever refused?"

She didn't ask what I meant. "No."

"Never?"

"They start with different questions."

"And afterwards?"

"They usually conclude the alternative was worse."

"Worse than what?"

She looked directly at me then — the only time she had all day — and said nothing at all, as if the answer itself were one of the things they weren't yet permitted to give back to me.

Then she left.

The stew cooled untouched. Instead I opened cupboards. Drawers. Boxes. Whoever had prepared the room had been meticulous. Too meticulous. People always left traces behind — receipts, hair, dust, half-finished thoughts disguised as objects. This room had none.

Except a folded paper napkin. Nothing else. No logo. No handwriting. Just white paper folded into careful quarters.

Inside, a dried stain spread across the fibres. Dark red. Wine. Tomato. Blood. Impossible to tell. The shape reminded me of a bird, or perhaps I simply wanted it to. The mind is generous with patterns when facts refuse to cooperate.

I turned it over. Three faint words, barely visible.

Don't finish it.

I looked at the untouched tray. Then back at the napkin. Only then did it occur to me — nothing before it had raised the question — that the meal might not be feeding me at all. It might be measuring me.

I sat with the tray a long time, doing nothing in a room built for observation.

At half past six the intercom crackled — the same static, the same texture as whatever waited behind my mother's face — and the woman's voice arrived, pleasant as ever.

"You haven't eaten."

"I'm savouring it."

"Nobody savours stew for forty minutes."

"You'd be surprised what nobody does, right up until they do."

She waited longer than she had all the other times, long enough that I pictured the clipboard, the pen hovering, someone deciding whether hesitation counted as data or as noise.

"Is something wrong with the meal?"

"Should there be?"

"No."

"Then there isn't."

I turned the fork in my hands twice before setting it down again, then I asked the question I'd been saving since the napkin. "Who was in this room before me?"

She didn't answer, and the not-answering had a different weight than her usual pauses — like someone who had already decided what she wouldn't say.

"No one has stayed in Room Fourteen before you," she said finally.

"The paint disagrees with you. There's a rectangle by the window, lighter than the rest of the wall. Something hung there. Recently enough that the wall hasn't caught up."

She was quiet again, briefly, and something in the quiet had changed register — not caught out, exactly, but recalculating.

"Phase Two begins tomorrow," she said. "Get some rest."

The intercom died before I could answer. She'd chosen the moment for that, too.

I didn't eat the stew. I wrapped it in the napkin with the words on it, folded the whole thing into a square small enough to hide inside a shoe, and lay on top of the sheets rather than beneath them, the way you sleep in a house you don't yet trust.

Sometime after midnight, the door unlocked itself. Nobody walked through — the maglock just gave its particular mechanical sigh and released, then caught again after a handful of slow breaths.

I never decided whether it had been a test or a mistake. In this building, I wasn't convinced the two were kept in separate drawers.

In the morning the tray was gone, taken sometime while I slept by someone who hadn't needed to unlock the door to do it, which meant the door last night hadn't been for the tray at all.

The woman arrived at nine, same smile, half a centimeter wide.

"How did you sleep?"

"Badly. On purpose."

"Congratulations," she said, and I understood, finally, that the word had never been for the soup, or the sleep, or anything I had done. It was for the fact that I was still asking questions at all. Somewhere behind the glass, someone else had stopped.

"What happens to the ones who finish it?" I asked. "The meal, I mean."

She didn't answer right away, and when she did, she used the sentence I now recognised as the only honest one she owned.

"They usually conclude the alternative was worse."

She held the door for me. I noticed, walking past her, that she didn't ask for the napkin back.

Posted Aug 04, 2026
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

49 likes 51 comments

Anne Tanner
August 22, 2026 20:38

This story offers a path to many paths of interpretation. All are likely valid in the minds of the reader hm? In music a musical piece usually ends on a major chord which sounds like the end. But if it ends on a minor chord, the listener waits……. And tension can result if the chord does not “resolve” into a major chord. That’s how I experienced this story. A popular song by Simon and Garfunkel titled “For Emily, wherever I may find her” ends on an “unresolved chord” and since it’s a love song I interpreted it as eternal love. In this story, the tension might be the best part of it! I agree the tightness of the story — no unnecessary distracting words — is excellent. Poetry especially haiku, is like that. I do love your writing Marjolein! I’m 77 and an avid reader, somewhat of a poet/musician. As for actual jobs I was an English teacher of teenagers! I’m trying to decide if I’m the patient or the nurse or the spot on the wall where something once was. 😂
Thank you and keep up the excellent work! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 22, 2026 21:04

Thank you so much — I absolutely loved your unresolved-chord comparison. That is very close to what I hoped the ending would do: stop, but not quite let the reader stop with it. And knowing that it worked that way for a 77-year-old poet, musician, English teacher and avid reader makes me smile enormously. 😄 As for whether you’re the patient, the nurse or the spot on the wall… I’m afraid I’m not going to resolve that chord for you either. 😂 Thank you for such a wonderful comment.

Reply

Kristin Neubauer
August 18, 2026 15:37

Wonderful! Mysterious, open, suspenseful, understated.....I love how you told this story and the open-endedness of it all. I don't even have a theory for this...just dwelling in that delightful feeling of mystery and not knowing.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 18, 2026 16:24

That may actually be my favourite way to read it — resisting the urge to solve it and just sitting with the unease. I’m very glad the mystery held for you instead of turning into frustration. :-)))

Thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment it. It means a lot to me.

Reply

Scott Speck
August 14, 2026 12:28

Marjolein, loved it! It's full of questions, with few answers. But for me, this is how life would be after some sort of radical "transition" from one state of life to another. If my mind were transplanted into a robot, and I woke up, how would it BE? I think it would be like this -- missing pieces of memories, static impressions, some true-to-life memories... But questions and more questions, with very few real answers.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 14, 2026 17:44

Another theory to add to the growing collection! 😄 I hadn’t thought of a mind being transplanted into a robot at all, but now that you mention it, I can see how the fragmented memories and uncertainty could lead you there. I’m really enjoying seeing how many completely different explanations readers come up with for what on earth is happening to this poor man. 😂 And all these theories are giving me lots of inspiration if I ever decide to explore this strange world a little further. Thanks for adding another one!

Reply

August 14, 2026 10:45

Marjolein, You continue to amaze me with your insight and ability to define how people dehumanize one another. Your hero in this case the patient, taking on the hypocrisy of this so called nurse. Lines like "Institutions loved exactness. It gave uncertainty somewhere to hide" and "The mind is generous with patterns when facts refuse to cooperate" Wow. Thanks again.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 14, 2026 17:46

Thank you! I love that you picked out those two lines — especially because I had a lot of fun writing them. And I really like your interpretation of the dynamic between the patient and the nurse. The word “hypocrisy” gives me something to think about, because I hadn’t consciously looked at her that way myself. Thanks for such a thoughtful read!

Reply

August 14, 2026 19:39

You always have the kind of line that stands out and are like foundational proverbs. When you have a chance please read my story called "Looking for Answers" I can't wait to get your take on it. Thank you.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 14, 2026 20:41

Consider it done! 💛

Reply

Alex Merola
August 12, 2026 23:29

Marjolein, You created an extensive atmosphere of institutional control and psychological claustrophobia. Lines like "Humor apparently was measurable" and "And instead? ... They served soup" provided sharp, dry wit dialogue. Nice work. The concept of "Selective Continuity" versus "identity laundering" is a deep thought. I thought it was a compelling mystery. Thanks again for a great read.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 07:08

Thank you — I really like that you singled out those lines, because that dry, almost bureaucratic absurdity was exactly the tone I wanted. “Selective Continuity” and “identity laundering” were also two ideas I enjoyed playing with, so I’m glad they stood out to you. I wanted the mystery to feel unsettling without ever fully explaining itself. Thanks for reading it so closely.

Reply

Helen A Howard
August 12, 2026 15:16

Hi Marjolien,
I’ve got a bit behind with my reading as life’s taken some odd turns lately.
Whatever is going on here, you conveyed something that managed to be both disturbing and surreal. Throughout, I felt the mc’s tenuous hold on reality. Overall, the story poses more questions than it answers — in the best possible way. It reminded me a little of the final scenes in 2001, space Odyssey. That was my interpretation. Creepy and dystopian, it left me wanting more.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 07:54

Hi! No worries at all — I hope life takes a few less odd turns for you soon. 😊 I really enjoyed reading your interpretation. “More questions than it answers — in the best possible way” is especially nice to hear, because that uncertainty was very much intentional. And I certainly didn’t expect a 2001: A Space Odyssey comparison, but I’ll happily take it! Thank you for coming back to read and comment.

Reply

Helen A Howard
August 13, 2026 10:37

It’s an amazing film! I hope to catch up with some more of your stories soon.

Reply

Akihiro Moroto
August 12, 2026 03:55

Is this purgatory? Is it some government experiment? Interrogation- or some sick corporate initiation for new hires? Regardless, the distrust, the unease, the sense of control taken away, and the details that give subtle clues- so impactful and keeping us fully engaged. Incredible storytelling as always, Marjolein! Thank you for sharing.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 08:12

Thank you! The funny thing is, I admitted to Kate earlier that I don’t actually know why he is there myself. 😂 I deliberately created the situation without deciding what was really behind it, which was part of the fun of writing it. But if I ever write a sequel, I may have to keep your three theories somewhere in the back of my mind. You might have done some of my worldbuilding for me. 😄

Reply

Akihiro Moroto
August 13, 2026 15:23

I love it! Great writing takes each reader on an imaginative ride. Mission accomplished!

Reply

Danielle Lyon
August 11, 2026 22:47

Shoutout to the character arc that mirrors the plot of this whole thing! There's an interplay of memory throughout that is cornerstone to an unreliable narrator. Who should the protagonist rely on, the warning in a folded napkin, or the caretakers and observers that scrutinize their every word, every movement? Seems like the latter is far more sinister, but there's creepy-crawlies associated with the former, too.

I also like that the procedure was never explicitly stated or explained. It's clear that this is institutional care, and there's been some memory alteration probably related to a past trauma, but it's unclear if it's elective or forced. Part of me thought this was some sort of post-military campaign memory altering procedure that masquerades as treatment for trauma, but is really more about covering for liabilities.

The fact that the threat is neutralized when the narrator ceases being inquisitive about the process is the ultimate in chills. Followers are always more convenient, aren't they?

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 09:07

I love your interpretation — especially the post-military campaign theory. But I have to confess, as I’ve already done elsewhere in the comments: I have absolutely no idea what on earth my MC is doing there myself. 😂 I created the situation without ever deciding what the procedure actually is, or why he’s there. The funniest part is that this seems to be producing far more interesting theories than anything I could have planned. And “followers are always more convenient” — yes. That one definitely hits the nerve of the story. Thank you for such a thoughtful read!

Reply

Harry Stuart
August 11, 2026 18:44

What I enjoy most about your writing, Marjolein, is the tightness of your prose. There is literally not a wasted word. To write with such conciseness where every emotion is precisely felt is a gift. I plan to re-read a few times to study how you set up each line.

You have a unique style and way of conveying eternal truths... beautifully done.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 11, 2026 20:03

The funny thing is that what you describe as tightness certainly isn’t there when I start. My stories usually go through many versions, and quite a few ideas never survive beyond an early draft. Somewhere along the way, I seem to keep stripping things away until only the parts that matter to me are left. So hearing that the end result feels as though there isn’t a wasted word means a great deal to me. Thanks Harry.

Reply

Kate Winchester
August 11, 2026 16:31

I’m jealous of your ability to write a great story after great story lol. I like how perceptive and non-conforming your MC is, whether that’s to his benefit we don’t know. This is a cool world you’ve built, and I want to know what happens next.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 11, 2026 16:38

Hi Kate,
Thanks!
I’m not sure I’d call it a cool world, considering I honestly have no idea what on earth he’s doing there myself… 😂

That was actually the fun part of writing this story: creating a creepy, strange fictional world without ever deciding what really goes on there. Maybe I should let my imagination wander a little further. Who knows, it might lead to a sequel. 😄

Reply

Kate Winchester
August 11, 2026 16:42

🤣 That’s great. I think you should let your imagination wander. A sequel would be fun.

Reply

Jo Freitag
August 11, 2026 21:38

I would love to read more of this story too! There are so many interesting possibilities!

Reply

Daisy Rubyns
August 11, 2026 23:42

I love how you just said that you had no idea what on earth he's doing there yourself. Sometimes that's just the way it is with authors, we don't know why our characters are acting the way they do or why they're where they are! That's the way I write most of the time, anyway. Your story kept me guessing, which I realized at the end was the intended result. Great job.

Reply

J Mira
August 10, 2026 22:40

I really liked how unstable this feels, Marjolein. Every new detail makes the reality around him slightly harder to settle. I kept forming an explanation and then having to adjust it. And that final detail, when she doesn’t ask for the napkin back, leaves exactly the right kind of doubt behind. Nicely unsettling.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 11, 2026 15:55

Thank you J,

“Nicely unsettling” — now there’s a wonderfully strange combination of words. 😂 I’m not entirely sure those two are supposed to be allowed in the same sentence, but I’ll happily take it! I love that you kept having to revise your explanation along the way. That was exactly the kind of uncertainty I was hoping to create. Thanks so much for reading!

Reply

Elizabeth Hoban
August 09, 2026 17:16

Oh wow! Once again, you wrote an incredible story that nails the prompt. It is sad and frightening to be in such a situation, but I am reading such hope in the end. The napkin is such a great tool to add depth to this already tense story. I love that the clue in the napkin stayed with me after I was done reading. Really is a perfect take on this prompt! This is a story that deserves attention. Well done!

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 10, 2026 08:12

Thank you so much for such an engaging comment. I was a little unsure about this one because the story reveals so little about what is actually going on. So it’s wonderful to hear that the writers who have responded have all been intrigued by different aspects of it. I’m especially glad the napkin stayed with you. Thank you!

Reply

The Old Izbushka
August 07, 2026 23:40

I felt I was thrown into an unsettling atmosphere that pulled me right into the intrigue of not really knowing what was going on! I loved how it gradually revealed that the real danger was not just the loss of memory, but loss of identity and even the ability to question what is happening. That is frightening. And the napkin... maybe she planted it, or someone else did, or was it a test?? One question that this story brings to my mind is if an institution tells you who you are, and you have no memories with which to contradict it, how could you ever prove they're wrong? Great story that has me thinking longer after reading.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 08, 2026 01:02

I love that the napkin left you with more questions rather than answers. And your question about identity goes straight to the heart of the story: if memory can no longer contradict what you're being told, what do you have left to prove who you are? Thank you for such a thoughtful reading, Old Iz!

Reply

Aaron Luke
August 06, 2026 12:53

This was interesting as it was confusing (in a good way) as it was frightening. Introduced to the fact that the protagonist has lost some memories (related to his loved ones) and further on to how he observes things in detail, even knows when the person speaking is uttering at pause or is just buying time to not answer. What stayed with me was how well you took the prompt. This was so unreliable. The prose and the imagery are slow and take in normal paces and when you reach the point where you start questioning yourself, you wonder for a second, what's going on? I really loved what you had to give here as it was exactly to the point and it stood out in the prompt as it should. Thank you for sharing this piece.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 06, 2026 19:32

What a thoughtful reading of the story. I love that you noticed those small pauses and observations, because that is where much of the unease hides. And the moment the reader starts doubting their own understanding is exactly what I hoped the unreliable narrator would achieve. Thank you for engaging with it so closely.

Reply

David Poslad
August 06, 2026 03:43

This is probably the best I read of you yet.
The atmosphere is so exceptionally eerie, it directly moved over onto me.
I really love how you used the narrator telling us about simple things like looking into the mirror or eating a meal, while making them sound slightly off. The haunting sensations stays long after.
Very well done!

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 06, 2026 19:17

Thank you so much! That's a wonderful compliment. I especially love that the ordinary moments felt unsettling to you—that quiet sense of something being just slightly wrong was exactly what I was aiming for. I'm really pleased the atmosphere stayed with you.

Reply

Mariyam G
August 05, 2026 15:21

Wow, this pulled me in right away. The tone is so calm and matter‑of‑fact, which somehow makes the creepy parts even creepier. The whole “Selective Continuity” idea is fascinating, and the napkin twist was perfect. Great work :)

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 05, 2026 21:02

Hi Mariyam,

I'm always very pleased with your comments. Thank you so much.

Reply

August 05, 2026 05:47

I really enjoyed the haunting atmosphere and the institutional setting. It felt authentic and unsettling. The clinical routines, impersonal staff, and constant monitoring created a powerful sense of unease that deepened the protagonist’s isolation.
The subtle tension you build throughout the story was very well done. I liked how you blended the persistent discomfort with the protagonist’s quiet skepticism. The mysterious note “Don’t finish it” was a brilliant touch; its cryptic warning added a layer of intrigue.
The protagonist’s internal conflict—clinging to fragments of the past, skepticism about institutional motives, and subtle acts of resistance—felt authentic and relatable.
I especially loved how you portrayed the loss of his personal memories. The distinction between retaining facts and skills while losing the emotional connections to loved ones was heartbreaking and thought-provoking. You captured the emptiness and disorientation that came with forgetting the most meaningful parts of his life, and you made his struggle feel deeply human. This aspect of the story added a powerful emotional layer and raised important questions about what truly defines our identity.
The ending was haunting and effective. It left me with a sense of uncertainty and unresolved tension, mirroring the protagonist’s own struggle. It made me reflect on the consequences of memory loss and institutional control. Great work, as always!

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 05, 2026 11:59

Thank you, Veronika. You picked up exactly what I hoped would sit beneath the surface: the strange divide between still knowing things and no longer knowing the people who once gave those things meaning.

I’m also glad the unease stayed with you without needing to be fully explained. That uncertainty mattered to me.

Your comments are always so attentive, and I genuinely appreciate that.

Reply

August 06, 2026 04:31

You're welcome. I always enjoy reading your stories.

Reply

August 04, 2026 19:43

I enjoyed the dry, controlled voice and the way ordinary details—the soup, the missing mirrors, the folded napkin—gradually become threatening.

The strongest idea for me is that the real test may not be whether the narrator remembers, but whether he still questions what he is being told. The final exchange leaves the mystery open without feeling unfinished.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 05, 2026 12:00

Thank you! I'm really glad that was your takeaway. I wanted the ordinary things—the soup, the mirrors, even a folded napkin—to become unsettling without ever turning the story into outright horror.
I also love your interpretation of the real test. Whether that's what was actually being measured... I'll leave that to the reader. 😊

Reply

Richard Fahy
August 15, 2026 05:02

Thanks! Wonderfully dark and ambiguous.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and part company with many (all?) of the other comments: I'm going to go with "this narrator is TOTALLY unreliable." I very much do NOT know what they said they saw or heard really happened. Presumably, somewhere there's some basis in truth, but the truth could very well be that the narrator has some very, very serious mental health issues, and the treatment they're receiving is very much the treatment they need.
Of course, that's probably all just paranoia on my part. After all, I myself would never trust the stew...or the Kool-Aid. (While we're at it, how DID you know about that napkin I found? HUH?)

Reply

Lucy Walker
August 12, 2026 23:41

This was amazing! I loved how it was strange enough to want to just keep reading, yet we’re just as uncertain as the main character at the end.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 07:03

Thanks Lucy, your comment means a lot. I wasn’t sure whether the story would leave the reader with enough uncertainty, so I’m really glad to hear that it did. 😊

Reply

Jo Freitag
August 11, 2026 21:44

I really enjoyed this story, Marjolein! There were so many possible explanations for the situation and you very masterfully left those open. The emotions and reasoning were so well expressed.

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 13, 2026 09:31

Thanks, Jo! Sometimes leaving my readers slightly in the dark is half the fun. 😂 I’m glad you enjoyed it!

Reply

Andrew Putnick
August 08, 2026 20:01

Very trippy tale. It confuses you enough to make you pick it apart. I like how you didn’t over describe, giving enough detail to anchor but enough room to imagine. Really fun read!

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
August 08, 2026 22:26

Thanks! My husband had no bloody clue what this story was about, so I’m glad it still gave you enough to work with. 😂

Reply

Andrew Putnick
August 08, 2026 23:27

I feel for him. You didn’t make it easy lol. And I’m not 100% sure I got it myself. But the best kinds of stories do that to you without disappointment. They’re what you come back to talk and debate about.

Reply

RBE | Illustrated Short Stories | 2024-06

Bring your short stories to life

Fuse character, story, and conflict with tools in Reedsy Studio. All for free.