Fall 1972, Philadelphia, PA
Rummaging through the vinyl tote, Rose pushed aside the baby bottles and cloth diapers before finding the manila folder near the bottom. She froze when an open diaper pin bit into her palm. Unwilling to wake Sophie, she pressed the sting to her mouth until it passed. Learning her lesson, she went back in for the folder, this time more gingerly.
She laid the unfinished dissertation proposal across her lap. It had been three days since her disastrous session with Dr. Balis, and she was still woefully behind. She had thought about canceling Sophie’s six-month checkup, but decided against it, so here she was in the waiting room, beneath the needlepoint wall hangings, rocking the stroller with one foot every time Sophie stirred.
Rose touched the pen to the margin of her proposal, but wrote nothing. The conversation with Dr. Balis kept diverting her from the sentence she had been trying to revise. She wished she had said more than “Lucky me” when he suggested that another husband might solve her problems. Her ex-husbands were her problem. But oh, well. Better retorts always came to her hours later, sometimes days, fully formed and utterly useless.
Of course he was a bardolator.
The clipboard-carrying nurse sauntered in and called a name that was, by her count, at least three patients ahead.
Two more days before the proposal was due, and Rose she was getting nowhere. She had nothing more to say about the new campaign finance laws. Disclosures, loopholes, reforms. Nothing. She closed the folder and returned it to the bag. Out of boredom, she perused the stack of magazines on the table beside her. Life. National Geographic. Ms. Magazine. Ultimately, she decided on the Business Week dated last November. Flipping through the pages, she scanned for anything remotely related to government policy. An article titled, “The Global Economy Enters a Rougher Decade” looked promising. She had finished two-thirds of the page when her palms began to glisten.
There it was, in the second column. In bold print. In a national publication.
“Preliminary estimates put the gross product of the world at…”
Rose read the number again. Then again.
$3,834,210,541,934.
Her stomach dropped.
She knew the number. She knew it because she had made it up.
A year earlier, still keeping her pregnancy under wraps, Rose was sent by her then-boss on a particularly complex fact-finding mission. Her task was to provide the number of the world’s gross domestic product. Finding the GDP of one nation was doable. But all nations combined?
After making fruitless calls to the United Nations and the World Bank, she headed down to the Public Library on 42nd and Fifth Avenue. Following a lengthy conversation and filling out a call slip, the reference librarian fetched the latest volume of the Yearbook of National Account Statistics.
She spent hours poring through the oversized book and jotting down what may or may not have been the GDP of dozens of nations. It required a crash course in knowing the difference between GDP and GNP, official exchange rates, and how on earth to include socialist economies.
But at every page she hit a new wall of understanding. There was simply no precedent for a number like this. No standard practice for measuring the economies of world nations. At the end of her exhaustive search, she returned to her boss with the bad news. No such number exists.
“I need it by five,” she recalled him saying.
She knew it was only a matter of time before her belly started showing and she was desperate to hold on to her job until then. Not wanting to disappoint, she spent the next few hours coming up with a convincing number. She added up the mishmash of facts she had collected and added her birthdate to the end for good measure.
And now the number, her number, was printed in Business Week.
It wasn’t the first time Rose had altered the facts when necessary. Her father had insisted on it from the moment they arrived in America. “In English,” he would say whenever his mother spoke Dutch. Rose, her brother, and her mother were never allowed to bring up their old life in Holland. Not where they came from. Not their wealth. Not their history. And certainly not their religion. And when Rose was asked about her background, she simply made it up. It was easier that way.
She scanned the article for attribution. Who said it? Where did they think that figure came from? What was the source? Who had been given credit for it? A footnote? A government agency?
Zilch.
Lowering the magazine into her lap, Rose noticed the pregnant woman beside her. She quelled the urge to lean over to this perfect stranger and admit what she had done. Luckily, the woman was too busy flipping through parenting pamphlets and baby naming books to engage in conversation.
Anyway, who would believe her? And more importantly, who would care? Rose had enough life experience to realize that most people were far too willing to rely on the so-called experts of the world.
She wasn’t sure if she felt pride or shame. Rose could now take her place in the long line of contributors whose falsehoods made it into the official record. She wondered if she would have been brave enough to share what she had done with Dr. Balis. Would he have blamed her? Understood? She imagined he would quote something from Macbeth in his pleased little voice in hopes she would see the error of her ways:
False face must hide what the false heart doth know.
But what, exactly, did Dr. Balis know? Made-up facts and figures slipped into the record all the time. In fact, in college, Rose had written a lengthy essay on John Payne Collier, the esteemed Shakespearean biographer later exposed for fraud and forgery.
In his case, there were so few details about the man from Stratford that Collier seemed to have taken the absence as an invitation. When the records failed him, he supplied the records.
Just like her GDP number.
And over a century and a half later, men like Dr. Balis were still worshipping this half-baked shadow of a man as the father of modern literature.
She retrieved the pen from her bag and wrote one word across the back of her hand.
Authorship.
By the time Sophie’s name was called, a new topic of her dissertation was beginning to take shape.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
I'm just an occasional contributor to Reedsy these days. So many other things get in the way. But I try to read the stories judged to be among the best. Most of them are fine but what I look for, what surely everybody looks for, is the really special story, the brilliant idea written with absolute panache.
Yours is one of those rare gems. Lovely stuff. One of the best tales I've read in a long while. Well done, Rochelle.
Ian
Reply
Wow Ian. Really appreciate it.
Reply
I like how you tied the theme of authorship to Collier, a false author, and to Macbeth, the murderer king. Well done!
Reply
Thanks Juli!
Reply
This story feels so cleverly-written. I had to read it again to find what I missed the first time. I liked how Rose's current situation felt like the sum of her described history. The topic of authorship was also such a great idea.
Congrats on your win <3
Reply
Thanks David!
Reply
If his fellow actors believed in Shakespeare’s authorship, that’s good enough for me. Either way, many are still inspired by his works and extraordinary penmanship. Also, truth has a habit of shifting with the times. A well written, thought-provoking piece.
Reply
Thanks Helen.
Reply
Fun story. Congratulations on the win! Welcome to Reedsy!
Reply
Thanks Eric!
Reply
It was funny how the MC added her birthdate to the GDP number and then it was published in BW as news. It feels like most of the business news on CNBC is like this... market is up today because [insert anything]..
And it appears that Shakespeare wrote this week's winning story! I had to look up bardolator. Congrats on winning with such a fun and unique story!
And TG all the comments for "If you ever want to see a scene as a comic, I'm on Discord at jenny.. " were deleted.on this winning entry, or else the emperor would be wearing spam
Reply
Congrats Rochelle and welcome to reedsy!
Also yes Scott ---- those comments are doing my head in. So many of them. I report them whenver i see them
Reply
Thanks Derrick!
Reply
Good one. yeah me too. I guess they don't take action until enough of us hit the report button.
Reply
Thanks Scott!
Reply
Scott Christenson — 'or else the emperor would be wearing spam' ....Love that!
Reply
Thx! My attempt at emperor wearing no clothes … what do you call this? And yes my ai says there is a word
A snowclone is a customizable cliché or verbal formula where you keep the structural framework of a famous quote but swap out key words so the original allusion stays obvious.
Reply
Nice! Got me mischievous now.
Reply
Great storytelling here. The made-up GDP being published... lol. I enjoyed reading. :)
Reply
Wonderful! Makes me wonder how many statistics are either miscalculated, incomplete, or made up. If made up I think they might at least be reasonable guesses. The big question though, in our so "smart " intelligence and AI driven society? How smart is smart enough? How ignorant is too ignorant? Can smart be ignorant at the same time?
Reply
This story is a deft, quietly compelling examination of truth, identity, and the uneasy space between personal history and public record. Its narrative strength lies in how it balances the intimate with the institutional: a young mother in a pediatric waiting room discovers that a number she fabricated under workplace pressure has entered the global economic canon. The juxtaposition is striking, and the author handles it with admirable restraint.
Rose is rendered with nuance—intelligent, exhausted, ambitious, and shaped by a lifetime of enforced reinvention. Her father’s insistence on erasing their Dutch past becomes a subtle but powerful through‑line, showing how fabrication has long been a survival strategy rather than a moral failing. This context deepens the emotional impact of her discovery in Business Week: the shock is not simply that her invented GDP figure has been published, but that it reflects a pattern of self‑effacement and adaptation she has never fully confronted.
The prose is crisp and observant, especially in the small domestic details—the diaper pin, the magazines, the rocking stroller—that ground Rose’s intellectual crisis in the physical reality of early motherhood. The pacing is deliberate, allowing tension to build naturally as she revisits the memory of her research assignment and the impossible demand that led to her invention. The parallel drawn to John Payne Collier is particularly effective, situating Rose’s dilemma within a larger tradition of authoritative falsehoods shaping cultural and scholarly narratives.
If the story has a limitation, it is that the final turn toward “Authorship” arrives somewhat abruptly. The intellectual epiphany is compelling, but the emotional transition—from panic to inspiration—could benefit from a touch more development. Still, the ending is satisfying: Rose’s confrontation with her own fabrication becomes the catalyst for a more honest and meaningful scholarly pursuit.
Overall, this is a thoughtful, well‑constructed piece that blends personal narrative with broader philosophical questions. It succeeds as both character study and commentary, offering a nuanced look at how the stories we tell—intentionally or not—shape the world around us.
Reply
A wonderfully written story: I loved it! Congratulations
Reply
Thank you!!
Reply
Yooh! what a nice story.
Reply
Thanks Mlungisi.
Reply
The things we must do to survive in this harsh world! Most of these things are so innocuous that one must do it instead of unnecessarily suffering. I really liked this aspect of the story.
I also liked that you showed that she had to hide her pregnancy to be able to keep her job for some more time.
And the best part is how she had been practicing faking it since her childhood. Everything ties in so well into the story and the character.
Somehow I felt that the initial few paragraphs could have been trimmed to reach the main theme faster. And somehow the Dr. Balls aspect doesn't add anything to the story. I do understand that these initial paragraphs were written to establish the character. But for me her childhood aspect was the only thing required for the actual story.
Overall it was a quick and fun read. If my boss insisted, even I would make things up to keep my job. We all must do what we can, to survive in this world.
Reply
Thanks for the feedback Abhishek.
Reply
Perfect!
Reply
Thanks Richard! I appreciate all your comments.
Reply
OMG hilarious! This story reminds me so much of grad school, and all the BS coming from the professors with their power trips! I really enjoyed reading it.
Reply
Waiting while out of time. Nice
Good story- congratulations
Reply
Hi! Asking for a friend, how is the prize sent to you? Via email or are there other ways? :0
Reply
Yes, via email, in email currency. Surprised you didn't know.
Reply
I wanted to keep read. Congratulations!
Reply
Thanks Janice!
Reply
Congrats on the win! I had to look up bardolator. :) There were so many great moments in this story, the detail of her birthdate being folded into the statistic was especially funny. I saw in the comments where the idea came from, and I’m really glad this piece won. It was a joy to read!
Reply
This is amazing writing woven in so much wit.
Reply
Thanks Angela!
Reply
This is a cool little story with a nice punch of humor. It has good pacing too.
How’d you come up with the idea? It’s actually believable that something like this could happen too.
Reply
Thanks Michael! The story is based on my mother, who did indeed make up a number for the world's GDP for a research company. It didn't make it into Business Week but it certainly could have.
Reply
I knew it. People overthink fiction writing when all they have to do is look into their lives and create stories out of things they've seen, heard, or done themselves.
Reply
That's amazing! Congrats on your win - This is a really engaging story and your narrative style is excellent and super breezy to read. Loved it!
Reply