The Official Record

🏆 Contest #360 Winner!

Fiction Historical Fiction

Written in response to: "Write about a breakthrough that arrives just in time — or much too late." as part of The Big Break with London Writers Centre.

Fall 1972, Philadelphia, PA

Rummaging through the vinyl tote, Rose pushed aside the baby bottles and cloth diapers before finding the manila folder near the bottom. She froze when an open diaper pin bit into her palm. Unwilling to wake Sophie, she pressed the sting to her mouth until it passed. Learning her lesson, she went back in for the folder, this time more gingerly.

She laid the unfinished dissertation proposal across her lap. It had been three days since her disastrous session with Dr. Balis, and she was still woefully behind. She had thought about canceling Sophie’s six-month checkup, but decided against it, so here she was in the waiting room, beneath the needlepoint wall hangings, rocking the stroller with one foot every time Sophie stirred.

Rose touched the pen to the margin of her proposal, but wrote nothing. The conversation with Dr. Balis kept diverting her from the sentence she had been trying to revise. She wished she had said more than “Lucky me” when he suggested that another husband might solve her problems. Her ex-husbands were her problem. But oh, well. Better retorts always came to her hours later, sometimes days, fully formed and utterly useless.

Of course he was a bardolator.

The clipboard-carrying nurse sauntered in and called a name that was, by her count, at least three patients ahead.

Two more days before the proposal was due, and Rose she was getting nowhere. She had nothing more to say about the new campaign finance laws. Disclosures, loopholes, reforms. Nothing. She closed the folder and returned it to the bag. Out of boredom, she perused the stack of magazines on the table beside her. Life. National Geographic. Ms. Magazine. Ultimately, she decided on the Business Week dated last November. Flipping through the pages, she scanned for anything remotely related to government policy. An article titled, “The Global Economy Enters a Rougher Decade” looked promising. She had finished two-thirds of the page when her palms began to glisten.

There it was, in the second column. In bold print. In a national publication.

“Preliminary estimates put the gross product of the world at…”

Rose read the number again. Then again.

$3,834,210,541,934.

Her stomach dropped.

She knew the number. She knew it because she had made it up.

A year earlier, still keeping her pregnancy under wraps, Rose was sent by her then-boss on a particularly complex fact-finding mission. Her task was to provide the number of the world’s gross domestic product. Finding the GDP of one nation was doable. But all nations combined?

After making fruitless calls to the United Nations and the World Bank, she headed down to the Public Library on 42nd and Fifth Avenue. Following a lengthy conversation and filling out a call slip, the reference librarian fetched the latest volume of the Yearbook of National Account Statistics.

She spent hours poring through the oversized book and jotting down what may or may not have been the GDP of dozens of nations. It required a crash course in knowing the difference between GDP and GNP, official exchange rates, and how on earth to include socialist economies.

But at every page she hit a new wall of understanding. There was simply no precedent for a number like this. No standard practice for measuring the economies of world nations. At the end of her exhaustive search, she returned to her boss with the bad news. No such number exists.

“I need it by five,” she recalled him saying.

She knew it was only a matter of time before her belly started showing and she was desperate to hold on to her job until then. Not wanting to disappoint, she spent the next few hours coming up with a convincing number. She added up the mishmash of facts she had collected and added her birthdate to the end for good measure.

And now the number, her number, was printed in Business Week.

It wasn’t the first time Rose had altered the facts when necessary. Her father had insisted on it from the moment they arrived in America. “In English,” he would say whenever his mother spoke Dutch. Rose, her brother, and her mother were never allowed to bring up their old life in Holland. Not where they came from. Not their wealth. Not their history. And certainly not their religion. And when Rose was asked about her background, she simply made it up. It was easier that way.

She scanned the article for attribution. Who said it? Where did they think that figure came from? What was the source? Who had been given credit for it? A footnote? A government agency?

Zilch.

Lowering the magazine into her lap, Rose noticed the pregnant woman beside her. She quelled the urge to lean over to this perfect stranger and admit what she had done. Luckily, the woman was too busy flipping through parenting pamphlets and baby naming books to engage in conversation.

Anyway, who would believe her? And more importantly, who would care? Rose had enough life experience to realize that most people were far too willing to rely on the so-called experts of the world.

She wasn’t sure if she felt pride or shame. Rose could now take her place in the long line of contributors whose falsehoods made it into the official record. She wondered if she would have been brave enough to share what she had done with Dr. Balis. Would he have blamed her? Understood? She imagined he would quote something from Macbeth in his pleased little voice in hopes she would see the error of her ways:

False face must hide what the false heart doth know.

But what, exactly, did Dr. Balis know? Made-up facts and figures slipped into the record all the time. In fact, in college, Rose had written a lengthy essay on John Payne Collier, the esteemed Shakespearean biographer later exposed for fraud and forgery.

In his case, there were so few details about the man from Stratford that Collier seemed to have taken the absence as an invitation. When the records failed him, he supplied the records.

Just like her GDP number.

And over a century and a half later, men like Dr. Balis were still worshipping this half-baked shadow of a man as the father of modern literature.

She retrieved the pen from her bag and wrote one word across the back of her hand.

Authorship.

By the time Sophie’s name was called, a new topic of her dissertation was beginning to take shape.

Posted Jun 22, 2026
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

79 likes 60 comments

Ian Craine
July 07, 2026 00:56

I'm just an occasional contributor to Reedsy these days. So many other things get in the way. But I try to read the stories judged to be among the best. Most of them are fine but what I look for, what surely everybody looks for, is the really special story, the brilliant idea written with absolute panache.
Yours is one of those rare gems. Lovely stuff. One of the best tales I've read in a long while. Well done, Rochelle.
Ian

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:27

Wow Ian. Really appreciate it.

Reply

Juli Maher
July 06, 2026 23:33

I like how you tied the theme of authorship to Collier, a false author, and to Macbeth, the murderer king. Well done!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 08, 2026 00:41

Thanks Juli!

Reply

David Poslad
July 05, 2026 07:41

This story feels so cleverly-written. I had to read it again to find what I missed the first time. I liked how Rose's current situation felt like the sum of her described history. The topic of authorship was also such a great idea.
Congrats on your win <3

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 05, 2026 21:16

Thanks David!

Reply

Helen A Howard
July 09, 2026 07:02

If his fellow actors believed in Shakespeare’s authorship, that’s good enough for me. Either way, many are still inspired by his works and extraordinary penmanship. Also, truth has a habit of shifting with the times. A well written, thought-provoking piece.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:30

Thanks Helen.

Reply

Eric Manske
July 06, 2026 19:53

Fun story. Congratulations on the win! Welcome to Reedsy!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 08, 2026 00:40

Thanks Eric!

Reply

July 03, 2026 16:02

It was funny how the MC added her birthdate to the GDP number and then it was published in BW as news. It feels like most of the business news on CNBC is like this... market is up today because [insert anything]..
And it appears that Shakespeare wrote this week's winning story! I had to look up bardolator. Congrats on winning with such a fun and unique story!
And TG all the comments for "If you ever want to see a scene as a comic, I'm on Discord at jenny.. " were deleted.on this winning entry, or else the emperor would be wearing spam

Reply

July 03, 2026 16:03

Congrats Rochelle and welcome to reedsy!
Also yes Scott ---- those comments are doing my head in. So many of them. I report them whenver i see them

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 04, 2026 01:53

Thanks Derrick!

Reply

July 03, 2026 16:07

Good one. yeah me too. I guess they don't take action until enough of us hit the report button.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 17:01

Thanks Scott!

Reply

July 07, 2026 22:55

Scott Christenson — 'or else the emperor would be wearing spam' ....Love that!

Reply

July 08, 2026 00:22

Thx! My attempt at emperor wearing no clothes … what do you call this? And yes my ai says there is a word
A snowclone is a customizable cliché or verbal formula where you keep the structural framework of a famous quote but swap out key words so the original allusion stays obvious.

Reply

July 08, 2026 06:31

Nice! Got me mischievous now.

Reply

July 24, 2026 19:30

The moment Rose saw her own number published was such a powerful turning point. It raises interesting questions about how easily information becomes “truth” when people stop questioning where it came from.

Reply

Kelley Badgerow
July 14, 2026 18:41

Great storytelling here. The made-up GDP being published... lol. I enjoyed reading. :)

Reply

Cathy Robinson
July 13, 2026 21:35

Wonderful! Makes me wonder how many statistics are either miscalculated, incomplete, or made up. If made up I think they might at least be reasonable guesses. The big question though, in our so "smart " intelligence and AI driven society? How smart is smart enough? How ignorant is too ignorant? Can smart be ignorant at the same time?

Reply

Kristy Lee
July 12, 2026 16:38

This story is a deft, quietly compelling examination of truth, identity, and the uneasy space between personal history and public record. Its narrative strength lies in how it balances the intimate with the institutional: a young mother in a pediatric waiting room discovers that a number she fabricated under workplace pressure has entered the global economic canon. The juxtaposition is striking, and the author handles it with admirable restraint.

Rose is rendered with nuance—intelligent, exhausted, ambitious, and shaped by a lifetime of enforced reinvention. Her father’s insistence on erasing their Dutch past becomes a subtle but powerful through‑line, showing how fabrication has long been a survival strategy rather than a moral failing. This context deepens the emotional impact of her discovery in Business Week: the shock is not simply that her invented GDP figure has been published, but that it reflects a pattern of self‑effacement and adaptation she has never fully confronted.

The prose is crisp and observant, especially in the small domestic details—the diaper pin, the magazines, the rocking stroller—that ground Rose’s intellectual crisis in the physical reality of early motherhood. The pacing is deliberate, allowing tension to build naturally as she revisits the memory of her research assignment and the impossible demand that led to her invention. The parallel drawn to John Payne Collier is particularly effective, situating Rose’s dilemma within a larger tradition of authoritative falsehoods shaping cultural and scholarly narratives.

If the story has a limitation, it is that the final turn toward “Authorship” arrives somewhat abruptly. The intellectual epiphany is compelling, but the emotional transition—from panic to inspiration—could benefit from a touch more development. Still, the ending is satisfying: Rose’s confrontation with her own fabrication becomes the catalyst for a more honest and meaningful scholarly pursuit.

Overall, this is a thoughtful, well‑constructed piece that blends personal narrative with broader philosophical questions. It succeeds as both character study and commentary, offering a nuanced look at how the stories we tell—intentionally or not—shape the world around us.

Reply

Gog .
July 10, 2026 23:44

A wonderfully written story: I loved it! Congratulations

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 15, 2026 19:53

Thank you!!

Reply

Mlungisi Bhengu
July 09, 2026 19:53

Yooh! what a nice story.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:28

Thanks Mlungisi.

Reply

Abhishek Sainani
July 09, 2026 04:37

The things we must do to survive in this harsh world! Most of these things are so innocuous that one must do it instead of unnecessarily suffering. I really liked this aspect of the story.
I also liked that you showed that she had to hide her pregnancy to be able to keep her job for some more time.

And the best part is how she had been practicing faking it since her childhood. Everything ties in so well into the story and the character.

Somehow I felt that the initial few paragraphs could have been trimmed to reach the main theme faster. And somehow the Dr. Balls aspect doesn't add anything to the story. I do understand that these initial paragraphs were written to establish the character. But for me her childhood aspect was the only thing required for the actual story.

Overall it was a quick and fun read. If my boss insisted, even I would make things up to keep my job. We all must do what we can, to survive in this world.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:30

Thanks for the feedback Abhishek.

Reply

July 07, 2026 22:46

Perfect!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:33

Thanks Richard! I appreciate all your comments.

Reply

Lyone Fein
July 07, 2026 03:27

OMG hilarious! This story reminds me so much of grad school, and all the BS coming from the professors with their power trips! I really enjoyed reading it.

Reply

Aimee Kluck
July 07, 2026 01:12

Waiting while out of time. Nice
Good story- congratulations

Reply

July 06, 2026 17:42

Hi! Asking for a friend, how is the prize sent to you? Via email or are there other ways? :0

Reply

Lilia B
July 07, 2026 04:13

Yes, via email, in email currency. Surprised you didn't know.

Reply

Janice Adkins
July 05, 2026 10:09

I wanted to keep read. Congratulations!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 05, 2026 21:16

Thanks Janice!

Reply

The Old Izbushka
July 03, 2026 23:09

Congrats on the win! I had to look up bardolator. :) There were so many great moments in this story, the detail of her birthdate being folded into the statistic was especially funny. I saw in the comments where the idea came from, and I’m really glad this piece won. It was a joy to read!

Reply

Angela Govender
July 03, 2026 19:06

This is amazing writing woven in so much wit.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 04, 2026 01:04

Thanks Angela!

Reply

Michael Danyluk
July 03, 2026 16:44

This is a cool little story with a nice punch of humor. It has good pacing too.

How’d you come up with the idea? It’s actually believable that something like this could happen too.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 16:58

Thanks Michael! The story is based on my mother, who did indeed make up a number for the world's GDP for a research company. It didn't make it into Business Week but it certainly could have.

Reply

Michael Danyluk
July 03, 2026 20:52

I knew it. People overthink fiction writing when all they have to do is look into their lives and create stories out of things they've seen, heard, or done themselves.

Reply

Jessica Fisher
July 03, 2026 17:07

That's amazing! Congrats on your win - This is a really engaging story and your narrative style is excellent and super breezy to read. Loved it!

Reply

Alex Merola
July 03, 2026 16:42

You bridge the three timelines beautifully through the theme of fabrication as a survival mechanism. Dr. Balis's suggestion "another husband might solve her problems"capture the specific friction of a brilliant woman navigating the mid-century academic patriarchy. I question if Rose already knew her specific number was in this specific issue? The impact of recognizing the 13 digit number seemed anti-climatic? Writing "Authorship" on her hand and explicitly stating "a new topic of her dissertation was beginning to take shape" explains a conclusion the reader has already thrilled to discover on their own. Thanks for the read.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 17:00

Thanks for the comment Alex. I agree. I am still working on "showing" not "telling".

Reply

Angie Cattron
July 03, 2026 15:37

You had me at Philly. It's my hometown ❤️ Great story! Congratulations!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 17:02

Thanks Angie!

Reply

Veve Jacques
July 03, 2026 12:19

This is such a clever tale! It's beautifully written. Congratulations on your win!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 17:02

Thanks Daniella!

Reply

Ajoy Majumdar
July 02, 2026 00:27

Hi, I read your story "The Official Record" and thoroughly enjoyed it. It's an intelligent, quietly compelling piece that turns what initially seems like an ordinary academic anecdote into a thought-provoking meditation on truth, authorship, and how "facts" become accepted history. I especially liked the understated irony of Rose's fabricated GDP figure finding its way into a respected publication, and the final revelation that this incident sparks her dissertation topic provides a satisfying "breakthrough" that fits the prompt beautifully. If I were to suggest one improvement, it would be to raise the emotional stakes just a touch by letting Rose's inner conflict linger a little longer after the discovery, allowing readers to feel more deeply the tension between guilt, pride, and survival before arriving at the elegant ending.

Reply

July 07, 2026 23:32

Ajoy Majumdar...
I would not change a thing. It hit with full impact. The emotion was there; 'chasing', 'in a rush, 'in a bind.' But I know what you mean. A baby will always pick up a change in the force when its mother is around to keep safety. If you look closely Rose has compartmentalised everything and is measuring borders, keeping order and working at the same time. Even if Rochelle may not have consciously known it, it had been woven in. 'However,' i'm intrigued if it would diminish the trajectory or sharpen it. Very good point out, viz. 'Rose's inner conflict linger a little longer .' I really don't know. What and how would you do it. To me, you can't, because it's someone else's masterpiece; add a brush stroke and it's no longer a master piece. But! Still intrigued.

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 03, 2026 17:03

Thanks Ajoy. I appreciate the feedback!

Reply

Alex Saška
July 09, 2026 16:44

Huge congratulations on your win! What resonated with me the most is how powerfully you portrayed the struggle of a woman in the 1970s—a reality that, unfortunately, hasn’t changed much today regardless of technological progress.A pregnant woman is still often treated like a ticking time bomb by employers, and when she is a single mother, she becomes an immediate target for sexism. This is a brilliant and engaging portrayal of a single mother's survival. It is a harsh reminder that women today go through the exact same struggles. As a writer, I see this pattern everywhere, especially in the Balkans, where female authors are still pushed into a subordinate position regardless of the exceptional quality of their writing. Thank you for shining a light on this!

Reply

Rochelle Victor
July 10, 2026 13:26

Thanks Alex. I really appreciate your comment and agree not much has changed.

Reply

Reedsy | Default — Editors with Marker | 2024-05

Bring your publishing dreams to life

The world's best editors, designers, and marketers are on Reedsy. Come meet them.