On the Usefulness of Bodies

Historical Fiction Suspense

This story contains sensitive content

Written in response to: "Write a story about a character who begins to question their own humanity." as part of What Makes Us Human? with Susan Chang.

On the Usefulness of Bodies: Mortuary scenes dissection immorality

His wife prefers the windows open, even in the cold.

‘The air settles otherwise,’ she says, though he has never observed it to do so. The street below carries the usual morning sounds. Wooden cart wheels complain against the cobblestones. A boy stands near the kerb, stamping warmth into his feet, the ‘Mail’ folded under his arm, his call rising thin in the damp air.

He tolerates the draught. It interferes with nothing essential.

At breakfast she speaks of ordinary things. The butcher’s bill. A neighbour’s indiscretion. A letter yet to be answered. He listens, not out of interest, but from habit. His hands remain steady, even in the chill. They have always been steady. It is remarked upon.

There is a small scar along her thigh, the result of a fall years earlier. He remembers treating it himself. Clean work. It healed without complication. At the time, he noted how neatly the skin took the stitching.

He notes such things without thinking. It is, after all, his profession to observe.

From the adjoining room, his case lies open on the table. Instruments wrapped in linen, each returned to its place after the previous day’s instruction. The newer students require repetition. They rush. They press too deeply. They mistake force for progress.

Since the recent regulations, the supply has improved, at least in theory. In practice, the deliveries remain irregular, and often arrive at hours that suggest discretion rather than order. It is not his concern to correct this. His concern is what is placed before him.

His wife pours the tea. ‘You will be late.’

‘I am not late,’ he says, rising. ‘I arrive when required.’

She smiles at that, though he is not certain why.

He closes the case with a firm, familiar pressure, and pauses, just briefly, as if considering whether anything has been forgotten. Nothing has.

Mist clings to the street, softening the Infirmary’s stone and dulling the ring of shod hooves. Somewhere behind the teaching rooms comes a brief metallic sound. Not loud. Not repeated. The sort of sound that belongs to work done early, and without audience.

He begins mid-explanation, as though the students have already been listening for years.

‘You will find,’ he says, ‘that the difficulty is not the cutting. It is the stopping.’

The young men lean forward. Some take notes. One does not look up at all. None look up.

He regards them without unkindness, though not yet as equals. Lucian Gumbolt is a tall, erect man who bends over his samples, for to him each cadaver is something to be tested rather than mourned. He does not regard his audience unkindly, but he does regard them as incomplete, their eyes trained to notice without yet knowing how to see.

He stoops like a praying mantis capturing its prey, first motionless, then swaying forward by small measures, his hands held folded until the instant arrives. Then they close, precise and unanswerable, and the work begins. He allows the silence to settle before continuing. Precision requires patience. So does understanding.

‘There is a tendency,’ he says, ‘to think the body resists you. It does not. It yields exactly as it should, provided you do not hesitate.’

He pauses, and for a moment his gaze lifts, taking in the room without fixing on any single face.

‘You are not here to feel,’ he says. ‘You are here to see.’

The words are not unkind, but they admit no argument. What the students bring with them, their unease, their curiosity, their sympathy, is of no value at the table. Only accuracy matters. Only restraint. He places the instrument down, not yet used, and folds his hands as if concluding a thought rather than beginning one.

The lecture room empties slowly, the students leaving as if from a chapel rather than a classroom. Gumbolt does not watch them go. His attention has already shifted. The instruments are cleaned. The body is covered. The theory has been delivered.

Beyond the main wings of the hospital, down a short passage seldom used by the public, the character of the building changes. The windows narrow. The air cools. Stone gives way to flag. The place is older than the reforms that pretend to govern it, and quieter than the wards would permit. This is where the Infirmary does not direct its visitors.

The two men do not announce themselves. There is no need. They stand to one side of the table, hats removed, coats still on, as if unwilling to settle into the room.

Their business is understood. It keeps itself within the letter of the law and just beyond its interest. Papers exist. Time has been allowed. Enough, at least, to satisfy inspection.

Gumbolt acknowledges them with a glance. Courtesy would suggest more. It would also invite conversation.

He inspects the first body without touching it. Stiffness. Colour settled correctly. Delay within acceptable limits.

The second draws his attention longer than necessary.

“You are later than I was told,” he says.

One of the men shifts his weight. The other offers a small movement of the hand, something between apology and dismissal.

“Circumstances,” he says.

Gumbolt considers this, not as explanation, but as data. Circumstances have a way of presenting themselves after the fact. Time, at least, can be measured.

“I prefer punctuality to certainty,” he replies.

No one disagrees.

The matter resolves itself without further language. “You are later than I was told,” he says.

One of the men shrugs, barely. An apology is prepared but not spoken. Excuses would add nothing.

“I prefer punctuality to certainty,” Gumbolt continues, already moving to the second form. “Provenance has a way of misbehaving. Time does not.”

The two men do not announce themselves. There is no need. They stand to one side of the table, hats removed, coats still on, their posture suggesting that whatever is required of them will not take long. Neither offers a name. Neither is asked for one.

Their business is understood. It keeps itself within the letter of the law and carefully outside the hospital’s interest. Papers exist. Time has been allowed. The bodies have gone unclaimed for just long enough.

Gumbolt acknowledges them with a glance. He inspects the first body without touching it, noting the stiffness, the settling of colour, the dull obedience of its timing. Satisfactory.

Then the sheet is drawn back from the second.

“She is fresh,” he says at once.

One of the men nods. The other touches the side of his nose, a small, unconscious gesture rather than a signal.

“Street girl,” the first says. “Didn’t have much to her.”

Gumbolt lays two fingers against the girl’s side, just beneath the arm. The warmth is undeniable. It has not yet had time to leave her.

“How long,” he asks.

“Within the hour,” the man replies. “Found where she fell.”

Gumbolt does not comment. He studies the marks instead, the compression at the chest, the hands that never learned resistance. His expression remains unchanged. This body will speak, and what it says will be of use to him.

That evening, the house receives him without ceremony.

He sets his coat where it belongs and washes his hands at the basin by the door, methodical, unhurried, as if the day has not required more than this small correction. The rooms are clean. Order has been maintained. His wife has seen to that, as she always does.

She sits by the window when he enters the parlour, the last of the light touching her profile. He notes her posture before he notes her face. She favours one side slightly now. He files the observation away without remark.

“You are late,” she says.

“Yes,” he replies. Not apologetic. Merely accurate.

He takes the chair opposite her rather than beside. From here he can see her clearly. The line of her neck. The way the skin has lost some of its firmness at the jaw. He wonders briefly when it began. Such changes seldom announce themselves. They collect quietly.

She is speaking again. He listens with the same attention he gives his students, separating relevance from filler, attending to what might require response. He answers where necessary. He does not notice the intervals when she waits.

Her cough comes near the end. Short. Contained. She excuses it without waiting to be asked.

He watches her recover with interest rather than concern. Colour returns. Breath steadies. The body compensates. He has seen this before.

When she rises to prepare supper, he observes the movement carefully. There is stiffness where there should be ease. Fatigue that does not align with her years. He does not comment. Comments interrupt patterns.

Later, when she has gone to bed, he sits alone and reviews the day. He thinks of the girl in the mortuary and of how plainly truth had declared itself, once uncovered. How the body, when properly examined, has no motive for deceit.

From the bedroom comes the sound of a hand against the mattress, searching briefly for support.

He notes it.

The thought that this bears relevance does not occur to him.

He watches her as she moves about the room. The assessment is automatic, carried out without intention. Build. Balance. The way fatigue settles first in the shoulders. She has always been healthy by habit rather than constitution, a body maintained through routine rather than strength.

He considers, briefly, that she has never been robust. Nor has she been fragile enough to warrant concern. A dependable form, altered only by time.

His thoughts return, unbidden, to the girl in the mortuary. How little there had been to her, and how clearly her body had spoken nonetheless. Even poorly nourished flesh, he reflects, can yield remarkable honesty when pressed.

His wife coughs again, lightly this time.

He does not turn. The sound registers and is set aside for later comparison. Freshness, he knows, is not a matter of age but of circumstance. Some bodies deteriorate despite care. Others arrive already ruined.

Supper continues. The meal resolves itself without remark. Plates are cleared. The lamp is trimmed. His wife speaks of small matters, and he replies where a reply is required. The rhythm holds. There is no rupture to mark the evening as distinct from others that preceded it. When they part for the night, he notes only that she tires more quickly now. Fatigue, he reasons, has many causes. Observation does not demand interpretation.

Sleep comes easily.

By morning, the habits of home give way to those of work without resistance. The hospital receives him as it always does, in stone and quiet. The passage to the mortuary narrows his attention. Sound dims. Distraction falls away. Here, things may be examined properly.

The body lies prepared. The sheet is drawn back. Gumbolt takes his place with the same composure he brought to the lecture hall and the supper table alike. The instruments are laid out in order. Everything is as it should be.

He begins.

The work draws him fully into itself. Hands move. Structures reveal themselves. Sequence asserts order. The body answers questions without ambiguity, and this pleases him more than he would admit if pressed.

There are moments when a detail suggests familiarity. Not enough to arrest him, only enough to be acknowledged and set aside. Similarity is not significance. Repetition does not imply connection. He has learned this over a lifetime of careful distinction.

Recognition tempts him briefly. He lets it pass. Inquiry begins where recognition ends.

He continues, attentive, exact, his focus fixed firmly where it belongs.

The rest can wait.

The lesson resumes without preamble.

Gumbolt speaks more precisely now, the hospitality of instruction withdrawn. Terms are named once and not repeated. Errors are corrected before they have time to become comfortable. The students shift in their seats, pens slowing, then racing to keep pace.

“You are watching too broadly,” he says, pausing behind one table. “The body rewards concentration, not enthusiasm.”

No one looks up.

A murmur passes through the room when he identifies a sequence of damage before the incision is complete. One of the senior men nods, as if witnessing confirmation of an article already read. Gumbolt notices this and allows it to pass. Approval that seeks recognition is of no use to him.

He continues, colder now.

“You may hear it said that anatomy is a matter of courage,” he tells them. “This is a misunderstanding. Courage invites interference. Accuracy requires restraint.”

The silence tightens. A student drops his pencil and winces at the sound.

Gumbolt glances at him briefly. “If the noise startled you,” he says, “be grateful it belonged to stationery.”

There is a bare flicker of something like humour, gone before anyone is certain it occurred. The tension eases only enough to sharpen attention further.

By the time he dismisses them, the room feels altered. He is spoken of in low voices as they leave, with admiration that borders on relief. It is reassuring to be taught by someone who does not pretend the work is kind.

Gumbolt cleans his hands thoroughly.

Understanding, he believes, is not owed comfort.

The body arrives after dusk.

The two men are careful with the stretcher, setting it down as one might lay a parcel that must not be dropped. Their account is prepared in advance.

“Woman in her thirties,” one says. “Collapsed in the street. Likely drink. Coach wheel took her face. Four horse. Bad luck.”

The other nods. The injuries support the story. The face is badly bruised, swollen, the features distorted enough to discourage close inspection. To the casual eye, it would be sufficient explanation.

Gumbolt does not respond immediately. He draws the sheet back and begins.

The external damage is thorough, but it is also superficial. Bruising blooms where pressure passed and moved on. There is no fracture deep enough to justify collapse. He opens the skull with care and examines what lies beneath.

The answer presents itself without ceremony. A clot. Firm. Established. It has sealed a vessel cleanly enough to halt the flow.

“Yes,” he says, softly.

He writes the word he prefers. Apoplexy.

The violence came after. The fall explains the rest. The body had failed before the street made its claim.

He proceeds.

When he opens the thigh, his attention pauses. There is a scar. Small. Old. Executed with assurance rather than urgency. It sits where one would expect such a thing to sit if it were meant to heal cleanly.

The mark is unmistakable.

He notes it without comment and continues the examination, returning his focus to the heart and vessels, to work that still remains to be done.

The men wait. They have given him what he needed.

Later, alone, he records the finding carefully.

Cause before consequence.

The order matters.

For a brief moment, alone with his notes, Gumbolt allows the question to surface.

He considers it without alarm. If something has diminished, it has done so without disruption. He speaks when answered. If something has diminished, it has done so quietly. The work continues. That is evidence enough.

He reaches the lecture room already decided.

The students settle as he reveals the specimen. He holds the small clot between forceps, raising it until the light catches its surface. He describes it precisely, its size, its placement, the certainty of its result. Apoplexy, he names it. How quietly it arrives. How reliably it ends.

One student’s breathing changes. Another shifts his gaze to the floor. A third swallows and does not look away, though his hand tightens on the bench.

Gumbolt watches none of this.

He experiences no hesitation. If there is a loss, it belongs elsewhere. His task is preservation of knowledge, not feeling. Lives will be protected later by what is learned now.

He sets the clot down and continues the instruction.

The students lean forward.

The body waits.

Posted Apr 03, 2026
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

3 likes 1 comment

JJ Gallo
12:13 Apr 09, 2026

You have a very interesting concept surrounding this story. I could imagine how dealing with death on a daily basis might make a person question their own humanity. I wonder how the story would go if that was explored more throughout the story. There is a set up with how each of the bodies arrive and analyzed I would like to see the internal srtruggle.

Reply

RBE | Illustrated Short Stories | 2024-06

Bring your short stories to life

Fuse character, story, and conflict with tools in Reedsy Studio. All for free.