I am not the one holding the knife.
That is the first thing you need to understand.
My hand is wrapped around the handle. My knuckles are white. There is blood on my sleeve, bright and theatrical, as though staged for a crime show. The kitchen smells metallic and sour. Something is dripping. The sound is steady. Patient.
But I am not the one holding the knife.
“Put it down.”
The voice comes from behind me. Male. Careful. Trained to sound calm.
He thinks he is speaking to me.
He isn’t.
—
You want a monster.
You want fractured mirrors and childhood trauma, a girl who snapped and doesn’t remember. You want to sort me into a folder labeled unstable, close it, and sleep better tonight.
Let’s try this again.
My name is Mara.
I am sitting at the kitchen table.
There is no knife in my hand.
The table used to be white. Cheap laminate, scratched near the edge where someone once pressed down too hard with a fork. I keep tracing that groove with my thumb. The indentation feels like proof that something sharp once lived here.
Across from me sits Dr. Levin.
He says, “You told the police you weren’t there.”
“I wasn’t.”
He nods as though this is expected.
On the counter behind him is a drying rack. One plate. One glass. One fork. The domestic stillness of a single person.
Except there were two of us.
—
His name is Daniel.
He says I am weak.
He says I step aside when things get hard. That I float. That I smile politely when I should scream. That I apologize for breathing too loudly.
He says someone has to take care of it.
He says someone has to do what I won’t.
You want to know when Daniel first appeared.
You expect a childhood basement. A father with a belt. A mother who looked away.
You expect a scene you can point to and say: There. That’s where she broke.
I could give you one.
I could invent a locked bathroom door and small fists pounding on it. I could give you bruises shaped like fingerprints. I could give you a reason.
But the truth is less cinematic.
Daniel showed up the night I didn’t leave.
—
“You’re overreacting.”
That’s what Thomas said.
The first time he grabbed my wrist too hard, I laughed.
The second time he called me dramatic.
The third time he pushed me against the fridge, he cried afterward. He pressed his forehead to mine and said, “You know I would never hurt you.”
And I believed him.
Not because I am stupid.
Because it is easier to believe in a softer version of the man in your kitchen.
Daniel says that is my flaw.
—
“Tell me about Thomas,” Dr. Levin says.
“He’s dead.”
He doesn’t flinch. “Tell me anyway.”
The air between us thickens.
You want me to tremble now. To whisper that I don’t remember. To say I lost time.
I won’t.
I remember everything.
—
I remember the plate shattering.
I remember the way he said my name, drawn out and irritated.
“Mara.”
As if I were a stain he could wipe away.
I remember my back hitting the counter.
I remember thinking: This is it. This is the moment people talk about later. This is the moment that changes you.
And I remember the quiet.
The way the room went silent inside my head.
That’s when Daniel stepped forward.
—
I am Daniel.
She always makes it sound poetic.
It wasn’t.
It was practical.
He had her pinned.
His breath smelled like beer and toothpaste.
She was calculating whether it would be worse tomorrow if she fought back tonight.
I don’t calculate.
I act.
The knife was already on the counter.
He didn’t see it.
I did.
—
You want me to say I blacked out.
You want her to be innocent.
You want a split so clean you can separate good from bad.
There isn’t one.
When I wrapped my fingers around the handle, she was watching.
When I pushed, she felt it.
When he made that small, confused sound — not anger, not yet — she heard it too.
Don’t look away now.
You wanted raw.
—
“Mara,” Dr. Levin says gently, “when you say ‘he,’ who do you mean?”
I meet his eyes.
“Daniel.”
“And where is Daniel now?”
I look down at my hands.
They are steady.
“He’s here.”
“Can I speak to him?”
A small smile curls at the edge of my mouth.
You expect a dramatic shift. A change in posture. A deepening of voice.
Something theatrical.
I disappoint you.
“He doesn’t like you,” I say.
—
I do not like him.
He smells like sympathy.
He looks at her as though she is fragile glass.
She is not glass.
She is bone and nerve and teeth.
He says, “Daniel, do you believe you protected Mara?”
“Yes.”
“From what?”
“From becoming nothing.”
He writes that down.
He thinks this is about safety.
It isn’t.
It’s about erasure.
—
You think this is a story about violence.
It isn’t.
It’s about disappearing.
For years, Mara perfected the art of it.
Soft voice. Smaller laugh. Shoulders angled inward.
She could shrink inside a room without anyone noticing.
Thomas liked that.
He liked that she folded.
I do not fold.
—
The night he died, the neighbors said they heard shouting.
They didn’t mention the weeks before.
They didn’t mention the way his hand tightened around her throat.
They didn’t mention the sound of the fridge door slamming so hard magnets fell off.
Violence is only interesting when it ends in blood.
The rest is background noise.
—
“Mara,” Dr. Levin says, “you understand that regardless of how you frame it, you held the knife.”
I tilt my head.
“You’re sure?”
He pauses.
“Physically, yes.”
Physically.
Such a careful word.
“Then tell me,” I say softly, “why do I feel relief?”
He doesn’t answer.
You expect guilt to flood me here. Tears. Regret.
There is grief.
There is shock.
There is the image of Thomas on the floor, staring at the ceiling as though confused by gravity.
But beneath it all, there is something else.
Space.
For the first time in years, the air in the kitchen felt wide.
—
You want to know if I regret it.
You want redemption or damnation.
Choose one.
It will make you more comfortable.
I can’t give you that.
I can tell you that when the police arrived, I told them I wasn’t there.
And in a way, I wasn’t.
I can tell you that when they asked if I feared for my life, I hesitated.
Not because I didn’t.
Because fear had become ordinary. The steady hum of a refrigerator. You stop noticing it until it stops.
I can tell you that when they asked why I didn’t leave sooner, I had no answer that would satisfy them.
Because “I thought I could handle it” doesn’t sound like a reason.
Because “I didn’t want to be alone” sounds pathetic.
Because “I loved him” — that word you keep waiting for — feels too clean for what it was.
—
“Mara,” Dr. Levin says, “do you think Daniel will hurt someone else?”
You lean forward now.
You think this is the twist.
You think I’m dangerous.
I lean back.
“I don’t know.”
That’s the truth.
Daniel doesn’t like being cornered.
Daniel doesn’t like when someone tells us who we are.
Daniel does not wake up looking for blood.
He wakes up looking for exits.
—
I am not a monster.
I am not a hero.
Neither is she.
We are a negotiation.
A truce drawn in the aftermath of a kitchen floor.
You expected shattered glass and insanity.
You expected me to be broken in a way you could pity.
What if this is integration?
What if Daniel isn’t the disease?
What if he is the scar tissue?
—
The first night alone in the apartment after everything, I stood in the kitchen.
I stared at the counter.
The knife block was still there.
One slot empty.
The air was quiet.
No footsteps behind me.
No breath at my ear.
I waited for panic.
It didn’t come.
Instead, I heard Daniel.
Soft. Almost amused.
“You can stand up straight now.”
I did.
My shoulders felt unfamiliar in that position.
Wider.
—
Dr. Levin will keep asking questions.
The court will use words such as dissociation and episode.
Experts will debate whether Daniel is a fracture or a coping mechanism.
You will sit there and decide whether to fear me.
Here is the part that goes against what you expected:
I am getting better.
Not quieter.
Not smaller.
Better.
Daniel speaks less now.
Not because he’s gone.
Because I am learning to say the things he used to say for me.
“No.”
“Stop.”
“Leave.”
They taste strange in my mouth.
Sharp.
Necessary.
—
You thought this would end in chaos.
It doesn’t.
It ends in a kitchen.
Sunlight on a scratched table.
One plate. One glass. One fork.
I trace the old groove in the laminate.
Proof that pressure leaves marks.
Proof that surfaces survive.
I am still here.
And so is he.
But now, when I hold a knife, it is to cut vegetables.
And my hand does not shake.
You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.
Wow, very intense, psychologically riveting story. Good work!
Reply
Thanks!
Reply
I really love reading your stories. Magnificent way of weaving the alternate personality in with the host. Nice way to show an instance where the alternate personality actually provides healing to the host. Excellent writing again, of course.
Reply
Thank you Eric — I always appreciate your comments.
I’m especially glad the healing aspect came through. Daniel was never meant to be a monster, but something protective — uncomfortable, maybe, but necessary.
It means a lot that you read it so closely.
Reply
The line “Violence is only interesting when it ends in blood. The rest is background noise” really stuck with me. This happens to so many people. Not just with violence, so many times people won’t notice the quieter things. But once someone finally stands up for themselves, they become the villain. For example if someone is getting bulled in schools, nobody will notice, or at least stand up for the victim. But once the victim finally snaps, and stands up for themselves, they get called violent or hostile.
This story is amazing, it makes you expect a horrible tragic backstory. Violent past, or at least regret. You expect an exact moment where they snapped. I love how the character addresses the reader directly. I don’t exactly know how to explain why, but it adds so much to the story.
Also, one last thing. I really, deeply, appreciate that you liked my story. You have absolutely zero idea how much it means to me.
Reply
This is really thoughtful — thank you.
You articulated something I hoped would land: that the buildup, the “background noise,” is often what gets ignored until there’s a visible rupture. And then suddenly the rupture becomes the whole story. I’m glad that line resonated with you in that wider sense.
I’m especially happy the direct address worked for you. It’s a risky device — it can feel heavy-handed — so knowing it added rather than distracted means a lot.
And about your story: I meant that like sincerely. When something stays with me, I say so. I’m really glad it mattered to you
Reply
Marjolein! This is fascinating. I love the idea of two personalities occupying a single person. Obviously, that's a real psychological condition, but in this case, I get the feeling that Daniel is the protective element in Mara's brain. He's her foil and an ally, but he's also a comparable adversary for Thomas.
Even though Daniel defends (literally, physically, violently) Mara, he also degrades and debases her. His very existence is because "someone has to do what she won't."
Very clever setup, and makes an interesting statement about the dynamic between the abuser and the abused, especially when the abused pushes back.
Reply
Danielle, it’s always good to see your thoughts on my work.
I’m pleased you picked up on that tension. Daniel protects, but he also costs her something. That contradiction sits at the core of the piece.
Reply
I absolutely love your writing voice.
You expect a childhood basement. A father with a belt. A mother who looked away.
You expect a scene you can point to and say: There. That’s where she broke.
I could give you one.
This gave me chills... I am sorry it has been a while. I am reading today and plan to add a couple more chapters on Reedsy later today.
I could invent a locked bathroom door and small fists pounding on it. I could give you bruises shaped like fingerprints. I could give you a reason.
But the truth is less cinematic.
Reply
That means a lot. That section sits at the heart of the piece, so I’m really glad it resonated with you.
I’ll keep an eye out for your new chapters today. Looking forward to diving in.
Reply
Interesting style of telling the story. It creates the effect you want of thoughts that evolve from one voice to another, overlapping, firing rapidly. I think that's what you're going for. I have a radical suggestion: start over and tell it all in third person limited. Let us see it all. Force us to figure out the changes going on inside of her, like a psychiatrist might. Describe scenes more. Take away the "writing." This is a powerful story of someone in danger but not in danger. Let us discover that. Sorry this is so absurd or unclear. It was just my instinctive reaction to a great premise. I like that you don't dissolve into plot management. You have a good idea and you run with it, My suggestions are not a "fix." Nothing is broken, It's just a gut feeling about what might make the reader a little more off balance. The 1st person narrator explains it all (and might be just a little too clever...as if she is also a writer). Let the reader be the writer, filling in the story part of it. Let your narrator be the eyes and ears, forcing the reader to watch and not look away.
I am down for more conversation on this if you like.
Reply
Thank you for such a thoughtful and generous response. I really appreciate the care you took in articulating your instinct, especially the idea of increasing reader unease by shifting distance.
The technical choice to combine first person with direct address (“you”) is entirely intentional. That tension between confession and confrontation is central to the structure of the piece. The “I” is also not fixed—its movement between Mara and Daniel is deliberate, and the slight instability that creates for the reader is part of the design. I wanted the shifts to require attention rather than be signposted. In third person limited, those transitions would inevitably become clearer, and the reader’s role would change. The friction between “I” and “you,” and the absence of explicit labels, are part of the architecture.
I’m grateful you engaged with it so seriously and explored what else it might become.
Reply
It always makes me uneasy to open up with my response, but it's a testament to how much I liked your story. You might be surprised to see how well this would work as a film. I think that's where my mind went when I thought about third person. However, what you've said is right. You are working on many different levels in this piece.
Reply
I appreciate you saying that. Openness like that makes thoughtful exchanges possible.
Reply
So many great dramatic lines. Absolutely propulsive and thrilling. Great work Marjolein!
Reply
Thanks!
Reply
Hello Mara,
I LOVE psychological fiction, so your writing is right up my alley. My favorite sentences were: "It ends in a kitchen. Sunlight on a scratched table." Are you a poet? If you aren't, you should be. The way you write is poetic.
Have you seen "The stairway" on Netflix? At first, I was reluctant to view this, because I had already seen the true crime documentary. However, Colin Firth gives a brilliant performance, as well as the actress who plays his wife.
I have no suggestions for improvement.
Thanks, and have a great day,
Ruth
p.s. My coincidence, I am writing a short story that is all about that "sweet" psychological horror. I am writing the story for a contest. (Not for Reedsy.)
Reply
Dear Ruth,
Thank you for reading so generously — it means a great deal that you’ve spent time with more than one of my stories.
I’m especially glad those final kitchen lines resonated with you. That quiet space was always the heart of this piece.
And I love that you’re exploring psychological horror yourself. There’s something powerful about that subtle, internal tension.
Warmly,
MG
Reply
Hello Marjolein,
Again, no worries! As writers, we must encourage each other. I am also lucky that I have people in my life who root for me when I get published. I've gotten published twice, and I'm incredibly happy about that. Well, one piece will be published March 1st, and the other will be published April 1st.
Anyway, I got off track. Sorry about that! :) What people are thinking in a story, is always more interesting to me than what people are saying. The bottom line is that I am always thinking about what characters aren't saying.
I admire 'Hills like white elephants' and actually tried to duplicate the sentence structure in a story of mine, once. I found that I couldn't. Anyway, I'm a big fan of Hemingway's short stories. His novels bore me. Isn't that weird?
Have you read Shirley Jackson's work? She's my hero, as far as what characters think, versus what characters say. My favorite work of hers is: "We have always lived in the castle." I saw the movie, first, and then I read the book. Both art forms were incredible.
Thanks, and have a great day,
Ruth
Reply
Very gripping!
Reply
Thanks!
Reply
Powerful storytelling, as always, Marjolein. The implied domestic abuse and the PTSD that lead to coping mechanisms. Each of us is wired differently when faced with relentless trauma. Hopefully, Mara could co-exist with Daniel- not be the dominant force in her life. Thank you for sharing!
Reply
Thank you — I value your thoughtful reading. The question of coexistence rather than dominance was very much at the heart of it. I’m pleased that came through.
Reply
The subject of one body and two consciousness has been the subject of several books. Usually they don't know about each other though.
I liked the repetition and the short staccato sentences, they have a good rhythm.
Great first line !
Reply
Thank you — I appreciate you noting the rhythm and the repetition. And I’m glad the opening line did its job.
Reply
I have read your bio, but I haven't much in the way of suggestions. There's a lot to like in this story. For a start, a good rendition of what coercive control looks like. I'm interested in a character's psychology, so I have a lot of sympathy for your approach here. Among the lines that stuck out for me: "Daniel does not wake up looking for blood. He wakes up looking for exits," and "What if this is integration? What if Daniel isn’t the disease? What if he is the scar tissue?" There are many others. Thank you for the opportunity to read your story.
Reply
Thank you for such a thoughtful response. I’m especially glad the psychological dimension resonated with you — that was the core I was trying to explore. Those lines you highlighted mean a great deal to me, as they sit at the heart of the story’s tension. I truly appreciate you taking the time to engage with it so carefully.
Reply
I really appreciate the way you challenge the reader to come to their conclusion about cause and effect and mental state and then firmly assert that this is your story and does not fit neatly into their suppositions.
Reply
Thank you — that tension between interpretation and ownership was very intentional. I’m glad you felt the resistance to easy conclusions. I really appreciate you engaging with it so thoughtfully.
Reply
It works. The voice holds. That’s the first thing. It doesn’t slip into melodrama. It doesn’t beg to be liked. It doesn’t apologize for being intense. It knows what it’s doing. The second-person address - the “You want…” - is deliberate. Accusatory without being hysterical. It forces the reader to admit their expectations before the story dismantles them. That control matters. Daniel works because he isn’t theatrical. He isn’t a demon. He isn’t a twist. He isn’t a spectacle. He’s practical. That’s what makes him unsettling. He doesn’t roar. He assesses. He calculates faster than Mara does. He steps in when she hesitates. There’s no dramatic voice drop, no cinematic possession. Just a shift in posture. A shift in willingness. That restraint keeps it believable. It’s clean. This isn’t about insanity. It isn’t about shock. It isn’t about gore. It’s about erasure. It’s about what happens when someone shrinks long enough that another part of them refuses to. The violence is handled well. You don’t indulge it. You don’t glamorize it. The most disturbing moment isn’t the stabbing - it’s the confused sound he makes. That’s human. That’s uncomfortable. That’s right. The ending works because it refuses extremes. No redemption arc. No descent into madness. No courtroom fireworks. Just integration. Just someone standing up straight for the first time. That line - “What if Daniel isn’t the disease? What if he is the scar tissue?” - is the spine of the piece. Everything bends toward it. As it stands? It’s controlled. It’s coherent. It knows what it is. It doesn’t ask for pity. It doesn’t ask to be forgiven. It just stands there and says- This happened. Sit with it. That’s confidence. And it reads like you meant every word.
Reply
Thank you Rebecca. I value the precision of your reading — especially your attention to restraint and control. That balance was intentional, so it means a great deal that you saw it. I appreciate the care and depth you brought to this.
Reply
Interesting. When she can no longer handle things another personality takes over. Trauma is hard and it's amazing what we do psychologically cope.
Reply
Yes — the mind can be astonishing in the ways it protects itself.
Reply
You had me hooked from the start! I enjoyed hearing Daniel, too. You have a certain rhythm to this. Starting with I and the expectation on Mara, shifting to You and how Mara, with Daniel, pushed through this. It starts and ends in the kitchen. Daniel takes over until she can hold and fully *control* the knife herself.
I love how you crafted this! The more I analyze, the more patterns I see here. Your Mara came back full circle but transformed, or rather, released the weight that was on her, reclaiming her self. "One plate. One glass. One fork", one knife at a time. Awesome job!
Reply
Thank you — I love that you noticed the rhythm and the circular structure. The kitchen framing was very intentional, so it means a lot that it resonated. And yes… one knife at a time. I appreciate your thoughtful reading more than you know.
Reply
A real gut-puncher. Lines that are somehow quietly visceral making them land with extra force.
I like the way you talk about the “room going silent inside my head.”
Violence is only interesting when it ends in blood. The rest is background noise. The way fear becomes ordinary. The way the Daniel lives on, becomes forever entangled in the psyche, almost an indistinguishable force. The disconnect from trauma, the standing outside the experience as a coping mechanism. Almost as if the whole thing has been decided long before it gets to court.
Excellent.
Reply
Thank you Helen — that means a great deal. I’m especially glad the quieter lines carried the weight for you. The ordinariness of fear, and the way coping can blur into identity, were central to the story. I appreciate how closely you read it.
Reply
I think this is your best one yet. An excellent depiction of Dissociative Identity Disorder without over explaining. It’s all in the nuances. And you managed to swap between the POVs without making it confusing. Well done!
Reply
Thank you — that means a lot. I was very aware of not wanting to overexplain or sensationalize it. I’m glad the nuance carried and that the POV shifts felt clear rather than chaotic. I really appreciate you taking the time to read it so attentively.
Reply
Marjolein- you had me absolutely hooked from the first sentence. The way you sorta wrapped it around again, at the end, with the bit about only holding the knife to cut vegetables, and having your hand not shake. That honestly was executed flawlessly. Beautiful. Another detail I enjoyed was the back-and-forth, which went perfectly with the format you chose for this story (which I thought was intriguing). Even though sometimes it did get a little bit confusing (which is absolutely okay, I'm neurodivergent too, even if that wasn't the case- whatever, I'm rambling, sorry), it was a really nice way to bring me this way and that way with your storytelling. This was overall a very intriguing, thought-provoking, hooking story. You should be proud! Amazing work, Marjolein!
Reply
It’s remarkable, Hazel. You’ve been the first to comment for weeks now, and that means more than you know. Keeping the characters clear, distinct, and consistent wasn’t always easy. I’m truly grateful to have you in my inner circle.
Reply
I'm glad that it means a lot to you when I first comment. I always strive to do that! Thank you so much. I'm grateful for you as well.
Reply
Needless to say: I look forward to your next story.
Reply