Submitted to: Contest #332

Vagrancy

Written in response to: "Write a story in which the weather takes an unexpected turn."

Science Fiction Speculative

You recovered this letter from a frozen stainless steel container buried in Antarctic ice. Rest assured, I am not writing you out of sentimentality. Rather, I have discovered that even at the end of times, a scientist feels obligated to file one last report.

For the last two years, I have lived at the South Pole engaged in the study of neutrino particles. Given that I could not possibly know your educational background, I will proceed assuming you know little about neutrinos. Neutrinos are so thoroughly uninterested in their surroundings that they pass through entire planets unaffected. The apathetic little creatures reek of nihilism. Our detector, buried deep in the permafrost, is designed to notice those rare moments when a neutrino acknowledges something other than itself. The only evidence of such an event is the faintest of faint blue flashes within the ice.

We could not ignore when the number of flashes began to multiply. At first, I assumed the increase would be explained by calibration error or, my favorite source of anomalies, an intern. It soon became clear to my colleagues and me that this was a genuine signal. Either our ancient atmospheric guardian, the magnetosphere, is dissolving, or our precious Sun was having another one of its tantrums. It was trivial to rule out our moody star, leaving behind the more grim, former explanation.

Our first collective response to the weakening magnetosphere was not action but debate, which is the scientific equivalent of denial with better vocabulary. Laboratories across the world challenged our findings on the grounds that they were inconvenient. A distinguished scientist in Geneva insisted our detectors were “misaligned with reality,” though he declined to specify which reality he preferred. Soon enough, satellite instruments, famous for their indifference to human opinion, corroborated our results. Within days, independent teams reached the same conclusions, their models converging not toward solutions but toward a countdown. It became clear any intervention would be outpaced by the decay rate. Then, almost as soon as consensus of what was happening was reached, the deeper cause was identified. Our planet's core, that swirling liquid metal, was cooling off.

At first, we resisted the conclusion. The core was not something one casually declared compromised. It was the assumption beneath every assumption, the hidden engine we rarely acknowledged precisely because it had always been there. The evidence accumulated with an indifference that bordered on insult.

Cooling, we learned, was the wrong word. What was happening was closer to settling. Convection within the molten layers had weakened, starved of the energy required to sustain motion. Without motion, there could be no magnetic field. Without the field, there could be no shield. The atmosphere, long accustomed to protection, was being asked to stand alone against the cosmos that have never been gentle. There was nothing to repair. No mechanism to restart.

The changes accumulated. Barometric readings drifted, as the planet's pressure began to change. Radios developed a constant hiss from the saturation of radioactivity. The wind abandoned any consistent direction; outside our lab, the winds came in short, agitated bursts that rattled fittings designed for steadier violence. Snow reorganized itself into ridges with no symmetry. Within hours, the auroras appeared where they had no right to be. Curtains of light rippled directly overhead, then everywhere at once. We logged everything. Even as exterior doors began seizing in their frames and pressure seals complained audibly, we continued annotating, tagging, time-stamping. Habit is difficult to abandon, even when the world itself has begun to fail.

We continued to behave as though procedure itself might save us. Morning briefings were held on schedule. Someone updated the whiteboard with tasks that no longer led anywhere. Another insisted on filing a maintenance request for a door that had frozen itself permanently shut. Meals were still announced over the intercom.

The weather made these rituals increasingly impractical. Crossing between buildings required careful timing, not to avoid the cold, but to avoid being lifted slightly off one’s feet by winds that arrived without warning or direction. Tools fractured in gloved hands. Instruments reported values that were technically numbers but no longer meaningful, as the entire planet's baseline values were perturbed. Still, shift rotations were posted. Someone even asked whether overtime would be approved. It is a curious thing how the mind copes.

Attention then turned to our last and most cherished contingency: escape. Since the dawn of science fiction, planetary evacuation had been treated as a distant inevitability. Unfortunately, we assumed the crisis would politely wait for our technology to mature. This merely sparked a second wave of wasted time as proposals poured in. Ark fleets. Chains of rotating habitats. I have always admired our optimism; it is the only force more persistent than gravity. At the peak, an otherwise well-respected scientist suggested we stimulate the “resonant geomagnetic harmonics,” a phrase whose chief virtue was sounding impressive enough that no one dared ask what it meant. The enthusiasm served with these ideas collapsed entirely once the follow-up question was asked: would any of this be achievable in four days’ time?

With escape removed from the menu, humanity did what it often does when confronted with the inevitable: it looked away from the practical and upward toward the philosophical. Were we alone in the universe? All the mention of billions of galaxies, each containing billions of stars; mathematically, it seemed rude to imagine ourselves the sole invitees to the party of life.

Yet probability's values come from many samples. Life, unfortunately, appears to have arisen on our one planet. And if consciousness exists only here, within this narrow band of atmosphere now unraveling without the Sun’s protection, then our extinction is not merely a human problem but a universal one.

There comes a moment when the mind, having circled every possibility, must accept the one that remains. Ours was this: we would vanish, and the universe would proceed untroubled by the loss. Outside my window, the auroras have grown violent and bright. I can hear the windows cracking under the cold and the pressure. The snow has changed character. I must go bury this now.

Posted Dec 13, 2025
Share:

You must sign up or log in to submit a comment.

11 likes 3 comments

Daniel Rogers
02:24 Dec 17, 2025

You know, I believe some people would be concerned about overtime, even if Earth refused to spin. Fun take, and nice name 🤣

Reply

Marjolein Greebe
12:06 Dec 16, 2025

The voice is impressively controlled: dry, intelligent, and quietly devastating. I like how the scientific precision never undercuts the existential weight — the metaphors stay restrained, letting procedure and habit carry the dread. The progression from data to denial to inevitability is especially strong. One small thought: the density of explanation occasionally slows the emotional momentum; a brief pause or more personal intrusion from the narrator could sharpen the impact even further without sacrificing tone.

Reply

19:48 Dec 16, 2025

The feedback means a lot, Marjolein! Thank you!

Reply

Reedsy | Default — Editors with Marker | 2024-05

Bring your publishing dreams to life

The world's best editors, designers, and marketers are on Reedsy. Come meet them.