Christian

The True Christ Revealed and His Space Age Relevance

By

This book will launch on Apr 30, 2020. Currently, only those with the link can see it. ūüĒí
Synopsis

This Book is to introduce to the world the hidden true story and facts about the Man who became known as Jesus. The main sources of this alternative and I think much more accurate reveal of the True Jesus were and are as ancient as the 1st century A.D., in the very life time of Jesus Himself, and certainly by 70 A.D..The oral lore was written down in later times and secretly retained by monks, some of whom wanted to confuse and discredit the truth. Jesus and His whole family were not from Jewish origins as is the false narrative.... Author's Lulu Spotlight for all Dennis's books is: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/dennisf456 The Author's Blog Site https://truechristbook.com/blog/

                   

Chapter 1.

                                                     Introduction.

 

This Book is to introduce to the world the hidden true story and facts about the Man who became known as Jesus. The main sources of this alternative and I think much more accurate reveal of the True Jesus were and are as ancient as the 1st century A.D., in the very life time of Jesus Himself, and certainly by 70 A.D..The oral lore was written down in later times and secretly retained, and some times also distorted by those monks who wanted to confuse and discredit the truth. Jesus and His whole family were not from Jewish origins as is the false narrative, but entirely of Pagan origins. And not simply that, but He and His brother Thomas, were best trained and schooled in Pagan knowledge. Jesus and Thomas, while educated in different learning schools with different skills and knowledge of different 'Calendars of Reenactments', they were both highly educated men of their times, or of any times. The narrative of a simple poor son of a carpenter is not only a false narrative, but an Insult to Him and to the Truth.

 

This Book brings to light the lore of the Ulster Red Branch, which records some times even in fine detail, the lives and events of the Christ Family and Players. That is, when and where they actually mostly lived; which was First Century B.C. and A.D. Roman Britain, in what became the Provence of Cambria. Oh yes, not just the Church but the Brits, especially the Royal Family, have had a hand in keeping this lore history  stifled. After all, the Crown is a 'Christian thing' to the Royal Family, or is it a Jewish thing? But, the King James Bible is one of the great achievements of the royal lines of Britain, and they officially hold the Old Testament as 'That Book of Prophecies'. and the Word of God. When ordained as monarchs as part of their 'initiation' the monarchs like Elizabeth, sit on the Stone of Scone with a massive ancient copy of the Bible in their hands. The Old Testament was not written by god, however great its prose, just read it end to end.

 

The True Christ was not simply of a different origins narrative, that He spent His youth being schooled from Alexandria in Egypt and in Ethiopia, to the chiefs and Druids of Britain. It was His roles and His Missions in a variety of ancient (Pagan) 'Calendars'. These Calendars are explained and shown this Book and are all Astronomy Based and timed. One times back to the Great Flood Year of 10,987 B.C. (13,000 years before 2013 A.D.) and another one, that of the 'Promised Lands' Calendar, to a Landing Time of Beings, around 8800 B.C.. The 'Calendars' were and are all about the Beings, whose earth this was and is.

 

In deed, the Authority of Jesus rests on their having chosen Him, whether you believe in Him or not. They soon retrieved Him after His death on the cross in 43 A.D (during the eclipse, then), and revived Him or returned a facsimile of Him, to continue on earth for a while, to achieve their mission and their  messaging through Him, to create both the Christ religions and then the Moslem ones there after! My title 'The Fifth Age of the Tree of Life 'Project' 30 B.C. to 750 A.D., the Project's Source and Purpose", goes into more of this history as it relates to the birth of Islam and more, but really for those interested in the True Christ, which is really the core success of these two Books, this briefer one has it all, and suffices.


                  Mary (Deidre) 'Woman of Sorrow', Mother of Jesus.

 

Mary is the next of the 'Mare's' and Mothers of the son primarily the cause of the Founding of a Church, based on Him. When after describing Nesse the 'Mother of the King' and a sea merchant, Mary seems not the only one central to the true and complete story. Indeed, Mary as she became known was Not a Virgin when made the mother of Jesus and, she was Not Jewish or a person born in Israel. Her story is not only Not of Devine interaction, but was and is such a very Human story, of a woman seeking to have a family and to survive in the face of great changes, challenges, and sorrows It is a true story very relevant today and for many, more than ever. Also, I do think in general, that as much as we may love or feel comforted by the Christ and Mary story of the bible and church teachings, many people today can no longer accept it. So now the true story, of a young woman struggling to have a family and survive in a very violent world.

 

The real Mary was very different than the storied one, proffered by the Church. According to first century lore of Cambria Britain transferred to Scotland and then to (Ulster) Ireland in the 1st Century, where it was re told in Irish locales and names...the real Mary was very human, and not some one who had a 'virgin birth' attended by an angel. The Cambrian lore about 'Mary', brought over to Ireland by fleeing Iceni bards in the 60s A. D., and told by Nesse to visitors to her in her cave in Southern France, knew a young girl by her original Cambrian temple title name of Deidre, or in some sources as Deichtine, or Dechtire.

 

Alike so many others then in the Celtic world, Deichtine was a 'Mary' or a 'Milis' by her position, the name again being a title as a Mili or Meri, a bee or a temple worker. The original lore in Ireland and Cambria Britain, tells us that the mother of Jesus, and thus the True Jesus, was not a Jew but a Pagan temple 'trainee', kept aside 'in waiting' because, besides her good looks, she had red hair and green eyes.

In Pagan beliefs then, from ancient times harking back to ancient Babylon and to red haired Isis of Egypt before then, she was as a virgin, a 'king maker'. The Deidre and Deichtine names named her as the Never Married Virgin Goddess Diana, the 'Dei Ich Dionne' (Deichtine). King Fergus supposedly had already promised her to another royal in order to seal a peace treaty. In certain times, if a king were to be chosen, the Diane Virgin had great influence on whether one or another would be chosen king or chief. .

 

At the birth of Deirdre, the mother of Jesus and perhaps also of Thomas, the Seer Oengus who became Merlin the Druid of Cathu, was visiting the house of the father, known as the 'storyteller' Fedlimid mac Daill. Fedlimid's wife was named Fernchoem, and she gave birth to a daughter, a red haired baby girl. Oengus prophesied that she will be so beautiful (and significant for the color of her hair and eyes) that kings will go to war over her, and that she will bring nothing but sorrow...that she will become the 'woman of sorrow'.  It may have been the Seers way of saying in Pagan terms, she was 'too good, too much', too powerful an influence on men and even affairs of state. At this the child was named and

titled the Deirdre. The king was advised by the Seer Oengus, and Fergus decides to have her brought up in seclusion from men, intending to either marry her when she comes of age or use her for a marriage pact with another king. But, she was in this Pagan way, very important from birth, and in that sense, 'chosen'.

 

Fast forward a dozen years or so, and the young girl elopes with a young man at court, called Naoise. He is not just any one, his two brothers are both prominent at the court of King Fergus, as already mentioned. One is Cormac Cond Longas or John in the bible and Lancelot in Arthurian legends. He was a Knight Errand for the King, and his wine Taster and Bearer of his Cup and Key to the King's wine cellar. The other brother was a wealthy Tin merchant, his conventional name being Joseph, of Ul Mathea, which I think was Midway. Along with Naoise's two brothers, the couple of young Deidre and Naoise go into hiding, but are eventually forced to flee to Scotland. Wherever they settle, the local king tries to have the brothers killed so that he can have Deirdre (Deichtine) for himself, and they have to move on. Eventually King Fergus mac Roich tracks them down to a remote island, and sends for to them with his guarantee of safe passage home. On the way home at a feast, Fergus's son Fiachu and Naoise are both murdered by √Čogan mac Durthacht, king of Fernmag, a small kingdom. Fergus, outraged by the death of his son and the betrayal of his honor, makes war against √Čogan mac Durthacht, starting the first such war or sorrow predicted at her birth by Oengus. King Durthacht is aided by Cormac Cond Longas (John), whose brother Naoise, was evidently caused to be killed by King Fergus.

This is one of several such local wars which erupted 'because' of Deidre. Durthacht and Cond Longas burn the Emain court  (Cathu) and they slaughter the maidens there, before going into exile with Medb and her husband Ailill, in Connacht. Deidre would have accompanied them and would have been in the care of and control by the man who became known as John the Baptist, or the Repentant. There is a bevy of Red Branch lore of 'endings' or as to what happened next to Deidre, from that she was forced to live with King Fergus for a year, to her committing suicide to be away from him, and more.

 

Significantly, every rendition of the Irish Woman of Sorrow has her life ending in Ireland or actually in Britain, in a tragic way....but, not one of them has what had to have been the real result, that she with John escaped Britain to Judea, by travel on a merchant ship on its way to the Port of Caesarea in Judea. In a perfect world we could say that Deidre or Deichtine was able to hide out for a while under the care of John, and then with a contact made by John's brother Joseph, fled by sea ultimately to Judea.

 

John had been a knight errand and the Cup Bearer to the King. He was known in Arthurian legend as a 'zealot', who later would howl so loud and often at the local king in Judea as to loose his head. Lauded then and today as a saint and a founder of Christianity, he could also be seen as a one time murderer of innocent defenseless temple maidens, like Nuns. So, he was actually a borderline maniac. If in this day of guns he were to have had a gun or guns, he probably would have shot up an event attended by king Fergus and his court. Unable to do that, he vented his rage against the king for the death of his brother Naoise, with a murderous rampage, killing some defenseless maidens and some kings men, and stealing the king's wine cellar key and drinking cup. In his rage, I think he devalued and denied that which the king valued most? Deichtine, as a Virgin...It is like the UFO conspiracy today, may be the government was right to lie!

 

John was the 'Gate Keeper' to the King's wine cellar and his taster, so that he was practiced in what was for a young maiden then, was a 'mystery art', that of the making of and the drinking of wine. I believe that Deidre or Deichtine actually believed that she was a Virgin, and was still a virgin despite her becoming pregnant after staying in hiding for a while, with John. I also believe that John, known as 'Long Lance' by the bards, that he would have also had union with Fernchoem, the young mother of Deichtine, and her life long attendant. The one of 'Mary' gave birth to Jesus and the other of 'Elizabeth' to Thomas the Twin, who would have had so much the same DNA as Jesus, as to nearly have been the likeness of Christ! 'All bad'?!

 

John would later wear the hair shirt of repentance and was living as an out caste when he reemerges in Judea, at the Cum Ram library location. His role as helper to the young mother of Jesus especially, clearly emerges him as the Angel Gabriel in the Bible. He it is who warns Josephtef and her that the agents of the king, of King Fergus that is, was closing in on her, to flee to Egypt or Ethiopia. Gabriel was the Church's rendition of the well known Geb, who had been Cheops....the governor of Egypt who Raped Isis and sired the Wonder Boy, Horus! As the Red Earth God of Egypt he united with the Sky Goddess of the red haired Isis, who was Sumeria's Nanana. The Angel Gabriel reemerges as the final Koran teacher of Mohammed.

 

Also very important here is who was pursuing the Holy Family shortly after the birth of Jesus. Not King Herod as he died soon after the Full Blood Moon of 1 A.D., not the Quarter Blood Moon which the Roman historian Josephus incorrectly stated, and so mis dated the death f Herod and the birth of Christ by as many as (7) years. King Fergus of Cathu was at the peak of his power with international contacts and spies and agents (knight errands) abroad! He was so in power until his war with the Trinobantes in 6 A.D., that the Romans intervened then to have him replaced! That was 7 A.D., and Fergus was replaced by the son of Nesse and Oengus, who was Erwain renamed Concho bar mac Nesse. It all fits and works...

 

When word circulated by traders of this change through the net work of Seers and the extended family members of Joseph in Judea, the pursuit of Deichtine (Mary) was ended, as she was no longer the business of that ousted monarch. The confusion of the dates of when Jesus was born was a great way of weakening the belief He was real at all. It also covered up that King Herod had killed an earlier truly Jewish Messiah born around 3 B.C., found as he was then by the Magi. He would have been killed almost the same month as Jesus was born. Knowing that Fergus was not the Holy Family they were able to return from Egypt or perhaps Ethiopia. Jesus emerges on the steps of the Temple already schooled enough in the scriptures then, to hold His own with the rabbis there. Later, Deidre takes Jesus (Dje Santi) back to Scotland. From there on His own he emerges at the court of Oengus and Nesse and their son Erwain, or Concho bar mac Nesse..

While pointing out scrambles and confusion, a major one in Irish lore is this next one, and I think it was intentional, secretly church sponsored. Irish lore substitutes the villain of King Fergus with the good king of Concho bar mac Ness. Constantly even. In as much as Concho bar was born the same year as was Jesus, it is bizarre that they have the boy Concho bar doing what Fergus had been doing, some times even before Concho bar was born. There is good reason to believe this scrambling was to disguise who was who, and that ultimately, the Cathu 'Woman of Sorrow' was the same as the Church's 'Woman of Sorrow', Mary!


After his anger had subsided and he realized what he had done, the guilt and sadness John must have felt must have been very great. In deed, he would become John the Baptist, the 'reformed sinner'. Using the king's bejeweled cup to 'baptize' Jews not allowed in the temple, while urging them to change their name and escape Judea as it was their 'End Times', also preaching the heretical message to Jews that the temple was Not needed to have a relationship with God, nor were rabbis or the priests. In chapter on John and the World Flood Calendar we can clearly understand what he thought was going to happen perhaps by our

year 70 A.D., and so his zealous 'end times preaching then.


And actually John and Jesus were right in their warnings and their expectations of an 'end times'. Because we now know that for the people then, they happened! Judea and Celtic Britain were absolutely destroyed by the Romans by or before 70 A.D.. Even the city of Rome was greatly consumed by fires during Nero's reign, fires which may well have been set by radical 'Christians' who not only believed it was the end of the word time, but were encouraging it to bring back Jesus! This was not the last time we have seen this human behavior, as even today's Isis and other Moslem movements have this kind of belief and agenda!


The alignments of Leo and Orion and the Earth's solstices, were such that like the Galactic Alignment of 2012/13, they would not happen again for another 13,000 years. But many Sky Watchers then feared that the terrible results which did happen in the earlier Galactic Alignment of the subsequent Great World Flood around 10,987 B.C. was or could happen in the year 70 AD., in the Gates Closing Year. I will make this hypothesis about John and the Book of Revelations which so aptly described the Galactic Alignment of 10,987 B.C. and its awful events which accompanied it. John the Father of the 'Twins', and who was expelled from Cathu Britain and was residing by the library of ancient scrolls of Cum Ram, he was the

John 'the Pappas', that there was not a 'John of Pappas'. John the Father wrote or dictated what emerged as the Book of Revelations, with exact astrological and astronomy coordinates if you will, of the projected Galactic Alignment of 2012/13.... Nothing was so well known by advanced Sky Watchers than the timing of that epoch horrible event. We know now that the Nine Beings used that alignment event to time the final placement of their Moon, in its orbit around the Earth. The 780/1560 year metronomes then began.

 

In John's mind, he would have expected that the 'Hand of God or the Gods', was going to strike the Jews down and End their world there, if they didn't realize their Covenant Period for the Promised Lands had ended. Yet, he was right....the 'Hand of the Gods' came in the form of the destruction of Judea, Jerusalem and the Temple, by the Romans, who were Very conscious of the Promised Lands Calendar, and that it was their turn for the 'taking' by a New People, to have and to hold the Lease Hold on those lands!

 

To the Romans, it was not myth but reality, that Saturn and Jupiter ruled the lands known today as Syria and the Holy Lands, and that Rome was agent on Earth for those Gods, along with him of Vengeance, the God Mars. Just as Geb and Gabriel was based on a real historic person of the 4th and 5th Dynasty times of Egypt, so was Mars. He was also known as Moloch, Miles, Malice, Millisi, Mere, and Mere Lew. He had a legion of names and they were as he said, 'based on what he did'! Like Nim Rod was another one of them, as was Narmer. Yes, the God of War and Vengeance was En Uma Sin, the God and Strong Cat (Lion) of Umma, the capital city of Mesopotamia....hence Narmer Sin. And who was the first king of Rome? He was named Numa Pompous, and he instituted for the first time then the 365.23 day calendar.


Mean while back in the time of Jesus, I expect that the other brother Joseph of Ul Mathea, was the one who took care of finding a contact in Judea for 'Mary', to take her in when she arrived in Judea. From one Joseph to another, the widower who was contacted by the Seers net work of contacts and travelers, was named Saultim by Irish lore, but Josephtef by Cambrian, and Joseph in the Bible. Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus. This is important as it is that father who would circumcise the male baby and thus bring him into the Jewish Covenant of Abraham, as a Jew, like Christian baptism in later years.

In both lore accounts, Saultim and Josephtef was considered a Seer, a level before being a Druid! He may have been both a Jew and a carpenter, but he was also member of a net work of Seers, much as a person today may be a Christian on Sundays and also a Free Mason or some thing. It is significant that John did Not marry the widow of his dead brother, as was the traditional role then, and that John would later rant at King Herod for marrying the widow of his dead brother. Had John married 'Mary' (Deichtine) who knows how this story would have gone, or if it would have at all. John fled Britain as did also Deichtine, and he became known in lore as the Exiled Prince. For six years there after, both he and Deichtine were persued by agents of King Fergus, he for his head and she for her return. If a child of hers were found, it would have been killed and she also, as she was no longer the special Vestal Virgin.

 

Post the First Century Roman invasions and wars in Britain, the very people who would have connected Chu Hu Illone with Christ, were wiped out. The relics which Joseph of Ul Mathea of his brother John and his nephew Jesus had most likely been deposited in the Temple to Augustus in today's Colchester. That temple was re made and expanded by the Romans to be the Temple to Claudius, post 46 A.D..The original Temple was originally constructed with the men of Cathu under Roman supervision, with a young teen age Cuhuillone left behind to defend the town. The temple was destroyed by the Iceni in their revolt led by Queen Boudica in the 60s A.D. a part and parcel of the 'curtains being ripped and down' on this entire age. 

 

Even the Romans who had holed up with in the inner sanctum (the original basilica area) of the temple, were burned alive! Any relics including the king's stolen Cup used by John and then by Jesus at the Last Supper, would have been destroyed in this fire, or buried in the rubble. The temple was re built by the Romans and eventually fell into ruins, so that there is now the ruins of the Castle of Colchester on its area, with many of the Roman stones and pillars incorporated into the castle.  

 

What is remarkable is how little is actually known of Concho bar's 43 year life from after when he takes the sword as a boy and began his 36 year reign, to when he goes to Rome to seek their aid in a growing war between the Cathu and the Briganti in 42 A.D., and finally his death in battle with the Briganti in

43 A.D..May be it was the peace and prosperity he brought during his reign, which makes no marks in the history books, then or now.

 

Where was Cathu or Cathuvillany (village-people)? In the book by David Young the 'Conquest of Britain', the Cathuvillany lived north of the Thames River. They originally inhabited the areas we know now as Warwickshire, Northampton shire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Their capital was

today's St Albans. After their defeat by Julius Caesar in 54 BC, they agreed not to attack the Trinovantes, the tribe to the east that was friendly to Rome. The Roman Army then left Britain. However around 6 A.D. the Cathuvillany broke the treaty and absorbed the area of Essex where the Trinovantes lived. They also probably took over parts of south Suffolk too. The tribal capital of the Cathu then moved to Colchester. The Cathuvillany thus became the most powerful tribe in southern Britain, reigning for nearly 40 years.

 

Note that in 6 A.D. King Fergus attacked the Trinovantes and defeated them. Rome would have responded to this affront, and 'lo and behold' we have the young boy Erwain, the son of Nesse and Oengus the Seer, being installed 'for a year', as the new king. He was able to stay on as king but note the timing of this event vis a vis actual Roman-British history, how the lore ties in completely in the time line. He is born year in 1 A.D. and at age (7) accepts the sword of rule at the Stone at Sterling, Scotland.


The other thing of note here is the name and people who were the Trinovantes. This people was the first to seek peace and alliance with Julius Caesar. They are the ones who gifted to him our 365.23 day solar based annual calendar, which Augustus later instituted in 30 B.C., adding the two months of July and August. But their origin story is what is also most interesting. They claimed to have been the New Troy ones, survivors of the Trojan War. They said they arrived in Britain after being defeated by the Pair of Og and mac Og, two 'giants', along with their armies of Hellenes. Arriving in Britain by the Channel from France, they routed other such giants who also arrived in Britain about that time, after their defeat at Egypt by Ram Seti 111rd (She Shack), some arriving with their sword hands cut off. But there may have been a time when the Trinobantes were the masters of southern Britain. A 'giant' by the way, may have been a person who was much above the five feet or so height of many peoples then, as in the six footers which occurred among the Celts and some Nordics, and as so many peoples in the west (America) are today.

But, their lore confirms the reality that there was a Troy, and that the Danoi of Ochy Och and Och Ulles or Achilles, were real and a terrifying force then. Ochy Och became Joshua Achilles David or Danovous. As David re named the city he took of Jerusalem, in 1003 B.C., so the Trojan War was fought around the 1014 B.C. area. Og or Ochy Och was Joshua, in an incredible softening of syllables. Together Og and mac Og are very significant in my Age 3 Book, and their acts are a real 'missing link' for a lot that happened then, from events beginning in China, and then the Pacific and Peru, to Europe and Greece (Ochy Och) and Israel, and finally, later to the founding and forming of what became Rome. The brother of Ochy Och? You know him well as Pharaoh Seti 1st, or not so well as Pele Seti...He fathered Ram Seti 11nd and I do suspect there was an earlier founding of a 'Rama' in Italy, atop the Palatine Hills. One other thing, it was and is Ram Seti, and not the circa 19th century PC correct change to 'Ramses'.


But let us return to Mary's son and the birth of Jesus, and the events before and after that great event. Firstly, Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus and Thomas, which meant he may not have done the circumcision of them. There is No record of it being done! The mother of Jesus was not Jewish and as a foreigner would have been known as a 'Pheoneci'. As Celts and not Greeks they would have moved to the region for them, of Galilee. and Jesus and Thomas would have known as Pan Cheri or Love Childs.


Nazareth or Nesse Roth would have been a Celtic town friendly to them, while Jesus had to avoid Bethlehem, the site of the Deaths of the Innocents under King Herod. As Mary and child were Not Jewish, they were not victims of the harsh Mosaic laws in regards to 'bastard' births, and an un married mother giving them birth, or a widow's brother not marrying her. Jesus and Thomas were not Jews, although as men learned of the scriptures, they could be 'rabbis' or 'teachers', but not Jewish priests. The Lobo which taught Romulus and Remis, the Pair who founded a pre 8th C.B.C. 'Rome', were taught by a 'Rabi'.   


An earlier 'chosen babe', whose birth was inadvertently told of to King Herod by the Three Magi from Como Magea, was born in the 3 B.C. time area. That babe, along with all other babes born in Bethlehem then, were killed on the orders of the paranoid and ruthless King Herod. Herod was obsessed with his retaining his throne and as the mega builder and ego maniac that he was, he perhaps secretly envisioned him self the 'messiah'! Herod had no compunction to having his favored wife significantly named 'Mary Ana' killed, along with their rabbi son whom she had begun to proffer as the awaited for messiah.


 Through out the Jesus story, even after His Ascension, when all sorts of interpretations of Him and His story and message arose both immediately, and then for centuries there after, this was originally a very human story! That's not to say that Jesus was not really resurrected and then ascended by 'super natural' beings and their technology, but it is to say that the human side of this story is full of human mistakes, coincidences, and random events and occurrences. 'Christianity' it self, has always been the 'miracle' of Jesus and His life, whether the story of His life was re formed and contrived, or not. But certainly, the time around 3 B.C. to 1 A.D.  was a time of serious astrology and astronomy events, as both Jupiter and Saturn did a series of conjunctions, just as the planets and the Star Regulas collected in the sign of Leo, and as planet Venus, in the Sign of Aries the Ram, also made significant alignments, according to observers.

 

Similar such astronomy events do happen about every 180 years, when the planets align in a corner of the 'sky'. One such event was in early 1980. But, un like in the time of Christ, media and covert deep state 'government' effort s were made, to mock the significance of the event then. I know as I personally was interested in it and felt the sting of the official public mockery of its significance. The CIA also shut down interest and study in Cycles in human activities, like wars, and more. I myself saw the CIA man from Virginia, collecting the files of research materials of Ned Dewey's Foundation for the Study of Cycles, which were all carted away as soon as he was deceased. So to me, the 1980 Alignment of the Major Planets, unlike the one (10) Cycles earlier around 1 A.D. which marked a Birth, this one marked a Death, that of Free America. They of the CIA and the FBI et al, have been at work killing America and its special ness every day, from assassinating people, to smothering knowledge, to lying about every thing, always.

There was one agency that knew of and used the Alignment, and that was NASA. They sent the Voyager space probes out in 1977 in order to use the lining up of the planets as a means to 'sling shot' them from one planet to the next further out. By 1982 they were successful in reaching and observing all the planets!.


Any ways, the word name Chu Hu Illone was not only describing the one Hero of Jesus (Setanti), but the other member of the Pair, His 'Twin'. The Chu word was Tchu or 'Two...with Thomas the other 'dog' or 'companion of god'. In fact, the name Thomas is based on the word 'two one' or 'twin', he was 'Twin'. He was per the bible separated from his mother and brother Jesus at birth, and handed over to the 'older woman', to be taken away with. I believe the older woman was Fernchoem the young mother of Deichtine (Mary), who was also made pregnant by the 'Longas', John! She bore Thomas and took care of him then.


Thomas only appears in the Red Branch and Roman history, after King Concho bar of Cathu Villainy is killed by a battle in 43 A.D..He may have had a head injury and died subsequently, but he died in this time from the battle wound. Thomas is there in Britain, evidently having left Judea just after the death of Christ on the cross. He was even per lore, blamed for bringing the bad news of the death of the Hero Cuhuillone, to the people and king of the Cathu, and so causing the king to expire of his head battle wound then.


Thomas was by his different up bringing and travels an 'out sider' to these people, for one thing he could read and write. He took possession of the Lion of John which either Jesus had brought there in His earlier extended trip to Spain, which was recorded in the Bible. Or, Thomas took the lion with him from Judea on his trip to Britain. Incredibly, the Romans were transporting lions and other wild animals as a matter of course, then. The Romans knew all of these Royals well, confirming the lore as history. I just wonder if they knew who Jesus really was, in the context of a Celtic court member with strong ties to the rulers.

 

Indeed, place your self in the 'sandals' of the Romans. On the one hand Jesus may have secretly been their Mithra Bull Man, their sacrifice in their regained Jerusalem, the Pagan 'fire works' to start their Promised Lands Covenant period of owner ship. On the other hand, news was just arriving of a battle taking place in Britain, between the Cathu and the Briganti peoples, the Cathu led by Rome's 'Arthur' Concho bar. What then or who was Jesus? Was He seeking to form a revolution and a second front against Rome, even to having Himself named 'King of the Jews', while over throwing Rome's puppet king line of the Herods?

The Romans crowned Jesus with a crown of thorns and covered Him with a Centurions red robe, all of which by the way shows up in the Mithra reenactment of the Bull fight, the matador in red and the Bull with a crown of garlings atop his, head between his horns. May be they saw Him in Both or All ways,

as the Warrior, the Priest, and now the King' as a Danovous.

 

The Year 43 A.D. was the pivotal turning time for the world then in the context of the 130 year demy cycle....what while sunny and optimistic in the first (72) years became in the 73rd year (43 A.D.) suddenly dark and pessimistic, the Cup half Full becomes half Empty. The Romans may have taken the charges against Him seriously in 43 A.D., even fashioning a wooden sign naming Him the 'King of the Jews'.

Mean while, Concho bar who was known by the Romans as Cunobeline, the Cymbeline of Shakespeare, after his death of his two sons of Togodumnus and Caratacus, Togodumnus the elder son, inherited his father’s kingdom. His brother Caratacus immediately set out to conquer other tribes of southern England. Some how Togodumnus is killed, and Rome by some accounts as bizarre as they are, began promoting the new arrival court member of the 'one with the Lion' of Thomas the Twin, as their next Rex Britanicus.

If you think of it, this one piece of history invalidates the entire church story of a humble simple Jesus! In any case, Caratacus did a sacrifice of a Righteous Man, by having him pulled apart by horses. Thomas with his Lion fled Britain to the main land and continued East with people later mis identifying him as Jesus, going all the way to China, and by some accounts, across the Pacific to Peru and eventually back to Ireland and Europe. The Romans in this time were known in the Americas, their leader of Caesar Augustus was the Saragossa or Great White Buffalo, instead of the Bull in the west. Romans brought trade, things.  

 

Thomas did become a great hero to the Irish, when around 50 A.D. via the Atlantic Ocean, coming from the West, he arrived from his around the world trip, going East all the way. He brought with him much wealth and some be feathered natives from the Americas, and only passed through Ireland to the east coast to embark back to Europe, with permission from a series of chiefs, who recorded this event in their lore. DNA evidence has surfaced among long time residents of Ireland of Native American lineage. To the Romans in 43/44 A.D., Thomas was of the 'Court and could read and write, and had the Lion of Kingship with him, so they tried to install him as their Rex Britanicus, at the death of Concho bar. The people revolted proffering Togodumnus, who was immediately some how killed.

 

The Roman wars and invasions then began in earnest. And by 70 A.D. Celtic Britain was subjugated, and by 470 A.D., was gone for ever. The revolt and war of the Cathu against the Romans, which brought Emperor Claudius to lead an invasion of Britain with War Elephants, had begun. The second son of Concho bar of Caracas was defeated and fled to Briganti, to Queen Cartimandua, or Gwen Eve! She betrayed him and turned him back over to the Romans. She was the same Queen who had divorced and expelled King Venuci, a brother of Nesse, who was the mother of Concho bar. Concho bar went to war with against the Briganti for his uncle Venuci. It IS a sensible story, of cause and effect and family royal ties and so alliances...and of how Celtic Briton was destroyed and turned into a Roman colony by 45 A.D., remaining so for the next 365 years till 410 A.D.. Synchronicity but by whom, the 'Twins' or the Romans? 

 

Until post 43 A.D., the Cathu people had never actually been defeated and subdued by the Romans. And, I wonder if that was in the mind of Jesus when on trial He in effect referred to 'if in His place among His people, He could summon superior forces even to Rome's'. Bible interpreters believe He was talking of a 'heavenly host' and today some interpret it as a reference to an 'extra terrestrial military'. I think He was thinking of the once powerful Cathu Celts! Post 43 A.D., in the Roman Wars led under Emperor Claudius, the Cathu people were for the first time, ultimately defeated. Other defeats were dealt the tribes of Britain there after, the final defeat of the Brits coming by 70 A.D. under Vespasian. In deed, after the failure of their nation wide revolt and war against Rome, led by Queen Boudica of the Iceni, the Brits were utterly defeated. Britain became non Celtic area, a refuge for Jews moved out of Judea in the holocaust there of 70 A.D., and again with the defeat of the last revolt of the Jews led by Bar Kochba, circa 132 to 135 A.D..

 

                         A Young Jesus on the Steps of the Temple.

 

The recorded appearances of Jesus are always not inside the Great Temple, but on the steps as a juvenile, and then at the entrance way with the money changers, and finally as a guest of the Jewish rabbi Peter, to his home temple, out side the city. He was not a priest but a rabbi (teacher) and not allowed to preach inside. This may have been a 'bone of contention' for Him, as He was dismissing the priests as 'in the way'.


While Jesus stayed in Galilee long enough to be later recalled as the carpenter's son, His next relocation took Him back to Britain! In deed, a second wave of lore emerged about a decade after the disappearance of King Fergus from the throne, of the return of the escaped Vestal Virgin of great beauty. Word and lore spread across Pagan Britain like a tabloid scandal story!

This time lore correctly says the young King Concho bar did want to see her, and like Fergus before him, had agents seek her out and report of her appearances. They gave such unflattering reports that she was now a woman of her late 20s perhaps nearing 30 years of age, and not the timeless goddess they had been led to believe by the bards. His interest waned completely. But, Mary (Deichtine) still had to have been fearful of being taken prisoner by the court of the Cathu people, despite it now being ruled by then by Concho bar mac Nesse. Her visit back to Britain may solely have been to deliver Jesus there, and it may have been even more involved. Lore from the beginning existed that she had had a family by her husband Naoise, and a daughter named Aebgreine. This was before Naoise's death and her flight to Judea. Was Deidre (Mary) back o make contact with her and any other child she may have had? Was Aebgreine located in the town of Setanti, and was she and Jesus introduced as brother and sister there. Was she the one who emerged as His constant female consort in the young Cuhuillone Red Branch lore? I say yes.

 

This page has a 1st Century map of Britain, according to Roman historians of the time. For Rome it was absolutely important to know the names and where abouts of the different 'kingdoms' of Britain. A 'Rex Britanicus' was first established by Julius Caesar in the 50s B.C., as one who held with the Romans the temporary position and title, which set him above the rest of the tribal chiefs under Roman subjugation.

The 1st century Roman Caesars especially, communicated with and through this 'Rex Britanicus', who would have been a member of the Round Table of the Twelve Knights of Roma, under Caesar Augustus. King Herod of Syria was another such knight. The only Queen recognized by the Romans in the First Century and perhaps ever in their 520 year history with Britain, was that one of both history and legend of Queen Eve or Gweneve, or Cartimandua, who ruled the Brigantes north of the Thames River, from the 30s A.D. to her ouster and demise by 69 or 70 A.D., again, in that year time of the 'Open Door Closing',    

              

I now bring to your attention that per the Cuhuillone Cycles the original name of Jesus was 'Setanti'...And if you look closely at the map the previous page, in the Brigantes realm, to the west coast, you will see the town or people of Setanti. It had to have been an advantageous staging and receiving area for shipping and trade on the Atlantic side. When Cuhuillone (Jesus) as a juvenile came to the court of King Concho bar mac Nesse of Cathu, He came as an Out Sider, a non member of the Cathu tribe and people. He fought his way in by defending Himself against the other young warrior trainees in their camp, who sought to kill him for arriving as He did unannounced. By proving Himself in that way, the King and his advisor Oengus, granted Him access 'to learn from all the chiefs, what ever knowledge they possessed'.

 

Indeed, this was a Death Sentence for this Upstart! For Oengus (Merlin) was sending Him on the path to become the 'well educated and well traveled person of virtue'....that He may be a best sacrifice when the tribe needed or wanted to sacrifice, of a Righteous Man (or Woman,) especially as He had red or auburn hair. Thomas the Twin fled Britain because he knew he was a candidate to be kidnapped and 'quartered' as a Righteous Man, by the Cathu son of Concho bar, who had just started a war with Rome.

 

I think Christ would have lived His life knowing this, that at some time and place He would either be asked to sacrifice Himself or be taken and forced to, as a Righteous Man. A pivotal event of Christ being at Cathu Britain, besides His arrival to the court there, was His defense of the Cathu village, while all of the 1200 able bodied men were away building a great structure. That structure was the building of the original temple to Caesar Augustus while he was still alive, although near the end of his life and reign. The inner temple had what became the 1560 sq ' Basilica measurements of the 60 feet times the 26 feet wide. Note, that the measurements are in Feet of (12) inches, as the foot, the inch, the mile measurement system was once world wide. The institution of the meter in Europe was a part of the One World Order process. The 10 meters is a 'Chain' of (33) Feet of (12) inches. Each 33 foot depth in water is equal to a barometric pressure of (1). The Foot system was and is a gift from the 'Gods', as the metric a dump made by evil men.

 

Any ways, during the building of the temple by the Celts of Cathu for the Romans, their town was attacked by another tribe. Jesus who was taller than most at almost six feet tall per the Shroud of Turin, was able to rally towns folk and by dint of His own arms, was able to defend the town. He became the Hero of the local Cathu people as a result of this act of bravery and perhaps brute strength. The Red Branch is also quite explicit that Cuhuillone had a terrible temper and when in battle (!) His appearances changed and He became contorted. He would get so angry! If you read a little between the lines in the Bible, like His attack on the Temple Money Changers, He stood His ground at every challenge, first using His mind and words.

 

The accounts of Cuhuillone become very sketchy after this time. Was He a warrior knight for a couple of decades, perhaps accompanying His uncle Joseph on Tin Merchant business, afar? The near end of His story in Britain is the result of a Dual He fought and won. Some how He inadvertently caused the death of some one He really loved and was close to and soon leaves never to return. Was this really about His 'dual' with His father John over the crowds at Judea, told and related to the Brits? I suspect that Jesus only learned of John being his father only days before or even after he was arrested, and then soon be headed, perhaps a result of their 'dual' to attract and retain followings. As the Eclipse time of 43 A.D. was approaching, Jesus the Righteous Man that He was, became busy in 'stirring things' up, making the 'waves' necessary to assure His timed arrest and death by stoning or on the cross.

 

I think the Time Architecture Operatives knew the event of His crucifixion was going to happen and may be a rendition of 'our' history, or with certain pivotal junctures and turning points and events in it, different possible 'renditions' of it. Different events like say the sinking of the Titanic or the arrival of Christopher Columbus are 'played' over and over again. So, it was very first day that He was in that tomb that He was gone, not any three days later. It happened while the winds and after shocks were still going on and people had sought cover. That was when Jesus was 'beamed up', by technology, assisted as it may have been by two Beings, seen by an eye witness named Stephen. He soon became the First Martyr for Christianity. Jesus the man was either some how revived and repaired, or as shocking as it may seem, He was replaced with a 'double' of Him, using 3D technology developing today as I write. Either way, 'He' soon appeared back on earth, doing the one thing which made Jesus the Founder of a New Religion, His having seemed to have escaped death. With out the death and Resurrection and His Re appearance on earth for those (40) days, He was just another great person with a Message, who 'came and went' like the rest of us.

                         

 

                              Jesus and the Temple Money Changers!

 

I happen to believe and think also, that the Shroud of Turin was made by the body of Jesus, when in the process of His being 'removed' by an advanced technology, which caused Him to be mostly levitated off the ground. Initiation of this act of removing Him, caused a fluid flash event with the shroud covering Him. While wiped clean no one had come in and put honey on Him for the burial, it was as if He had been hurriedly brought in to the tomb and left there, as the earth quakes and winds were on people's priorities. Again, the earth quake during the eclipse was a 'meaningful coincidence'. A man named Stephen who witnessed the Ascent was stoned to death for saying so, as Saul later named Paul, was said to have watched and held his garment. I date this event and the start of St. Paul's important Church ministry as soon after the crucifixion as to be still in the year 43 A.D.. Paul and Peter and others were executed in the 60s A.D., two decades or more after the year 43 A.D. and not 32/3 A.D. per church.

 

I believe the Shroud of Turin was and is real, and was a result of Jesus being Beamed up and out of the tomb and up into a craft, manned by very intelligent Beings, who knew exactly what they were doing and what the results would be to us in our history since then! The Resurrection or not, was a pivotal turning point, and that it happened man kind received a world religion with a genuinely Good message, one in which no one was required to be killed or be sacrificed...bread, wine, and fish. Look at the next page at the face of Jesus per the Shroud of Turin, I think just after He was brought away from the 'X Cross' that the Romans would have used...leaned as it had been against a tree, not hung from a tree.

 

The hair is white and fresh blood was still on His head and in His hair. This man is Dead, His eyes firmly closed. No one should make the case He was brought away from the cross alive. His nose may have been broken by the Centurions instead of His ankles, which if the ankles are broken makes His removal from the cross and area all the more difficult. Again His hair is white as will a red haired person's hair will be at age 43, I know. Not so a black haired. His head is very long and narrow, His chin mustache divided, a sign of a Mithra initiate or priest. His brow was very thick. To me He does not look 'Semitic', or entirely so. But, He could pass as a fighting man, a boxer even, and not the 'mellow yellow' one so often portrayed. Not politically correct some may say, but this is my Book of Truth as I see it.

             The Head and Face of Jesus, per the Shroud of Turin.                                

 

The next page is a Catholic portrayal of the Crucifixion, shown and incredibly titled by the Church as the '5th Sorrow of the Mary'. In deed, did the church quietly accept that Mary was Deidre in the Red Branch cycles, known there as the 'Woman of Sorrow'? The last earthly event of Jesus was the Crucifixion, and it is befitting that it was that scene in the life story of Jesus became the 5th Sorrow of Mary, apropos as it was the 5th Age of the Tree of Life, or certainly the 5th House of Pisces and the Church of Christ era..

 

                 The 'Fifth Sorrow of Mary, Jesus Dies on the Cross.

                                   

 

I think the answer of whom Jesus kissed on the lips and showed great affection to was the woman the savvy Nesse (Mary Magdalin) would have brought with her, on her trip to see John the Exiled Prince, and Jesus the Hero of Cathu. I refer to the consort of Christ all of His adult life, of His half sister Aebgreine, Fiona in the Red Branch cycles. She would have been in her mid forties like Christ and had had deep ties and history and understanding of Him. I can not yet prove this and may be it is un provable, but for me it confirms my theory that the dual which Jesus won, but which caused His opponent (John His father), to be killed, was that dual fought over and for the crowds at Judea. and that He did not dual and kill a beloved one in Britain.

 

What was this dual I refer to? John was offering the Re Birth of a person from a dipping under the healing waters of the River Jordan, and the poring over his head of that water from the bejeweled and probably dazzling Cup in John's possession, the King's drinking cup which he had taken with him from Britain! Jesus on the other hand, physically healed sick people, especially on the Sabbaths, and He taught what may have been a radical idea for the common folk, that there was an After Life when we are departed, and the more humble a person's circumstances the better chance of entering that after life.

 

In fact, what I see as a great tell in this, is when Jesus began saying to followers of John, who having lost him now hesitated in following Jesus instead, as the newer arrival, and not with all of the drama which I am sure zealot John provided. The message of Jesus then becomes to Follow Him as to do so they would re gain 'company' with 'His father in heaven' of John! This was 'wild', but we really don't know what thee people were expecting to happen. Was the esoteric idea of the Open Gate with its astronomical events, become then to be the expectation of a Rapture, a rupture in the steady line of history? 

 

The church had to re interpret this, that Jesus was referring to not His 'father John in Heaven', but to the All Father in Heaven, the Creator of the Universe Father, and that Jesus was proclaiming Himself to be the Son of the All father in heaven. I contend that He was living in the context of His local surroundings and His own events, and that He felt He had to make this incredibly bold connection and message in order to keep and grow His followings, and to keep His disciples....for the soon to happen Eclipse and Passover, which was to be , had to be Christ's final act of message deliverance. 

 

The Disciples mean while, at this time, began arguing as to what position at the Table of Jesus and the Father, would they be seated when what ever rapture' event they were expecting to happen, had happened! The closer to Christ and the Father, the higher their position. It was an all human story, elevated by the event of His 'resurrection and return', and then many conceptions and misconceptions by those in Jerusalem, and by Paul, and then by the church martyrs, and founders and authors. It worked!

 

We must now move on to a higher understanding of us in this universe, and of those also here before us....and instead of the Priests in the way smothering us and hoarding knowledge and developments, we must get the Deep State governments out of the way of us. Their fears and hold on power is what motivates them. But, it is our bodies and souls and minds, which are our responsibilities and not theirs, which they are keeping down, and away from their full realization. .


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                       

Chapter 1.

                                                     Introduction.

 

This Book is to introduce to the world the hidden true story and facts about the Man who became known as Jesus. The main sources of this alternative and I think much more accurate reveal of the True Jesus were and are as ancient as the 1st century A.D., in the very life time of Jesus Himself, and certainly by 70 A.D..The oral lore was written down in later times and secretly retained, and some times also distorted by those monks who wanted to confuse and discredit the truth. Jesus and His whole family were not from Jewish origins as is the false narrative, but entirely of Pagan origins. And not simply that, but He and His brother Thomas, were best trained and schooled in Pagan knowledge. Jesus and Thomas, while educated in different learning schools with different skills and knowledge of different 'Calendars of Reenactments', they were both highly educated men of their times, or of any times. The narrative of a simple poor son of a carpenter is not only a false narrative, but an Insult to Him and to the Truth. In general, if this Book serves as one more 'nail in the coffin' of the Catholic Church, especially with its Communist Pope Francis, who is a leader in the occult efforts of the One World Order cabal, than so be it! The future of man kind in what are going to be times uncontrollable is to be as Smart as Possible, including in knowing 'who is what' here.

 

This Book brings to light the lore of the Ulster Red Branch, which records some times even in fine detail, the lives and events of the Christ Family and Players. That is, when and where they actually mostly lived; which was First Century B.C. and A.D. Roman Britain, in what became the Provence of Cambria. Oh yes, not just the Church but the Brits, especially the Royal Family, have had a hand in keeping this lore history  stifled. After all, the Crown is a 'Christian thing' to the Royal Family, or is it a Jewish thing? But, the King James Bible is one of the great achievements of the royal lines of Britain, and they officially hold the Old Testament as 'That Book of Prophecies'. and the Word of God. When ordained as monarchs as part of their 'initiation' the monarchs like Elizabeth, sit on the Stone of Scone with a massive ancient copy of the Bible in their hands. The Old Testament was not written by god, however great its prose, just read it end to end.

 

The True Christ was not simply of a different origins narrative, that He spent His youth being schooled from Alexandria in Egypt and in Ethiopia, to the chiefs and Druids of Britain. It was Hs roles and His Missions in a variety of ancient (Pagan) 'Calendars'. These Calendars are explained and shown this Book and are all Astronomy Based and timed. One times back to the Great Flood Year of 10,987 B.C. (13,000 years before 2013 A.D.) and another one, that of the 'Promised Lands' Calendar, to a Landing Time of Beings, around 8800 B.C.. The 'Calendars' were and are all about the Beings, whose earth this was and is.

 

In deed, the Authority of Jesus rests on their having chosen Him, whether you believe in Him or not. They soon retrieved Him after His death on the cross in 43 A.D (during the eclipse, then), and revived Him or returned a facsimile of Him, to continue on earth for a while, to achieve their mission and their  messaging through Him, to create both the Christ religions and then the Moslem ones there after! My title 'The Fifth Age of the Tree of Life 'Project' 30 B.C. to 750 A.D., the Project's Source and Purpose", goes into more of this history as it relates to the birth of Islam and more, but really for those interested in the True Christ, which is really the core success of these two Books, this briefer one has it all, and suffices.

 

Who am I? Born in Boston MA and brought up by my parents Joseph and Mary Anna Foley in Brookline, and then Dedham, MA..I have been doing independent research for the last 63 years. I am 73 years of age. History is my world of facts and dates, and for decades I sought to find Cycles....in the economy, the stock market, and in every thing from the silk trade from ancient times to the occurrence of drought caused wild fires in America, to the rise and fall of nations and empires. A couple of my previous Cycle studies will be on my Authors site, along with my book on man made 'formations' in history, 'America's Book of Secret Formations and Dark History' (ISBN 978-1530364718.) As early as the 1970s, I was a contributor to the Foundation for the Study of Cycles in Pittsburg, and a guest to study there of Mr. Ned Dewey, the founder. I graduated with honors from Northeastern University, Boston, MA..This Book is the result of many efforts by me, over a long period, some briefly self published on Amazon until more ideas, and improvements came. Now I give you, "The True Christ Revealed, And His Space Age Relevance".

 

Chapter 2.   

 

                 Mary (Deidre) 'Woman of Sorrow', Mother of Setanti, (Jesus).

 

Mary is the next of the 'Mare's' and Mothers of the son primarily the cause of the Founding of a Church, based on Him. When after describing Nesse the 'Mother of the King' and a sea merchant, Mary seems not the only one central to the true and complete story. Indeed, Mary as she became known was Not a Virgin when made the mother of Jesus and, she was Not Jewish or a person born in Israel. Her story is not only Not of Devine interaction, but was and is such a very Human story, of a woman seeking to have a family and to survive in the face of great changes, challenges, and sorrows It is a true story very relevant today and for many, more than ever. Also, I do think in general, that as much as we may love or feel comforted by the Christ and Mary story of the bible and church teachings, many people today can no longer accept it. So now the true story, of a young woman struggling to have a family and survive in a very violent world.

 

The real Mary was very different than the storied one, proffered by the Church. According to first century lore of Cambria Britain transferred to Scotland and then to (Ulster) Ireland in the 1st Century, where it was re told in Irish locales and names...the real Mary was very human, and not some one who had a 'virgin birth' attended by an angel. The Cambrian lore about 'Mary', brought over to Ireland by fleeing Iceni bards in the 60s A. D., and told by Nesse to visitors to her in her cave in Southern France, knew a young girl by her original Cambrian temple title name of Deidre, or in some sources as Deichtine, or Dechtire.

 

Alike so many others then in the Celtic world, Deichtine was a 'Mary' or a 'Milis' by her position, the name again being a title as a Mili or Meri, a bee or a temple worker. The original lore in Ireland and Cambria Britain, tells us that the mother of Jesus, and thus the True Jesus, was not a Jew but a Pagan temple 'trainee', kept aside 'in waiting' because, besides her good looks, she had red hair and green eyes.

In Pagan beliefs then, from ancient times harking back to ancient Babylon and to red haired Isis of Egypt before then, she was as a virgin, a 'king maker'. The Deidre and Deichtine names named her as the Never Married Virgin Goddess Diana, the 'Dei Ich Dionne' (Deichtine). King Fergus supposedly had already promised her to another royal in order to seal a peace treaty. In certain times, if a king were to be chosen, the Diane Virgin had great influence on whether one or another would be chosen king or chief. .

 

At the birth of Deirdre, the mother of Jesus and perhaps also of Thomas, the Seer Oengus who became Merlin the Druid of Cathu, was visiting the house of the father, known as the 'storyteller' Fedlimid mac Daill. Fedlimid's wife was named Fernchoem, and she gave birth to a daughter, a red haired baby girl. Oengus prophesied that she will be so beautiful (and significant for the color of her hair and eyes) that kings will go to war over her, and that she will bring nothing but sorrow...that she will become the 'woman of sorrow'.  It may have been the Seers way of saying in Pagan terms, she was 'too good, too much', too powerful an influence on men and even affairs of state. At this the child was named and

titled the Deirdre. The king was advised by the Seer Oengus, and Fergus decides to have her brought up in seclusion from men, intending to either marry her when she comes of age or use her for a marriage pact with another king. But, she was in this Pagan way, very important from birth, and in that sense, 'chosen'.

 

Fast forward a dozen years or so, and the young girl elopes with a young man at court, called Naoise. He is not just any one, his two brothers are both prominent at the court of King Fergus, as already mentioned. One is Cormac Cond Longas or John in the bible and Lancelot in Arthurian legends. He was a Knight Errand for the King, and his wine Taster and Bearer of his Cup and Key to the King's wine cellar. The other brother was a wealthy Tin merchant, his conventional name being Joseph, of Ul Mathea, which I think was Midway. Along with Naoise's two brothers, the couple of young Deidre and Naoise go into hiding, but are eventually forced to flee to Scotland. Wherever they settle, the local king tries to have the brothers killed so that he can have Deirdre (Deichtine) for himself, and they have to move on. Eventually King Fergus mac Roich tracks them down to a remote island, and sends for to them with his guarantee of safe passage home. On the way home at a feast, Fergus's son Fiachu and Naoise are both murdered by √Čogan mac Durthacht, king of Fernmag, a small kingdom. Fergus, outraged by the death of his son and the betrayal of his honor, makes war against √Čogan mac Durthacht, starting the first such war or sorrow predicted at her birth by Oengus. King Durthacht is aided by Cormac Cond Longas (John), whose brother Naoise, was evidently caused to be killed by King Fergus.

This is one of several such local wars which erupted 'because' of Deidre. Durthacht and Cond Longas burn the Emain court  (Cathu) and they slaughter the maidens there, before going into exile with Medb and her husband Ailill, in Connacht. Deidre would have accompanied them and would have been in the care of and control by the man who became known as John the Baptist, or the Repentant. There is a bevy of Red Branch lore of 'endings' or as to what happened next to Deidre, from that she was forced to live with King Fergus for a year, to her committing suicide to be away from him, and more.

 

Significantly, every rendition of the Irish Woman of Sorrow has her life ending in Ireland or actually in Britain, in a tragic way....but, not one of them has what had to have been the real result, that she with John escaped Britain to Judea, by travel on a merchant ship on its way to the Port of Caesarea in Judea. In a perfect world we could say that Deidre or Deichtine was able to hide out for a while under the care of John, and then with a contact made by John's brother Joseph, fled by sea ultimately to Judea.

 

John had been a knight errand and the Cup Bearer to the King. He was known in Arthurian legend as a 'zealot', who later would howl so loud and often at the local king in Judea as to loose his head. Lauded then and today as a saint and a founder of Christianity, he could also be seen as a one time murderer of innocent defenseless temple maidens, like Nuns. So, he was actually a borderline maniac. If in this day of guns he were to have had a gun or guns, he probably would have shot up an event attended by king Fergus and his court. Unable to do that, he vented his rage against the king for the death of his brother Naoise, with a murderous rampage, killing some defenseless maidens and some kings men, and stealing the king's wine cellar key and drinking cup. In his rage, I think he devalued and denied that which the king valued most? Deichtine, as a Virgin...It is like the UFO conspiracy today, may be the government was right to lie!

 

John was the 'Gate Keeper' to the King's wine cellar and his taster, so that he was practiced in what was for a young maiden then, was a 'mystery art', that of the making of and the drinking of wine. I believe that Deidre or Deichtine actually believed that she was a Virgin, and was still a virgin despite her becoming pregnant after staying in hiding for a while, with John. I also believe that John, known as 'Long Lance' by the bards, that he would have also had union with Fernchoem, the young mother of Deichtine, and her life long attendant. The one of 'Mary' gave birth to Jesus and the other of 'Elizabeth' to Thomas the Twin, who would have had so much the same DNA as Jesus, as to nearly have been the likeness of Christ! 'All bad'?!

 

John would later wear the hair shirt of repentance and was living as an out caste when he reemerges in Judea, at the Cum Ram library location. His role as helper to the young mother of Jesus especially, clearly emerges him as the Angel Gabriel in the Bible. He it is who warns Josephtef and her that the agents of the king, of King Fergus that is, was closing in on her, to flee to Egypt or Ethiopia. Gabriel was the Church's rendition of the well known Geb, who had been Cheops....the governor of Egypt who Raped Isis and sired the Wonder Boy, Horus! As the Red Earth God of Egypt he united with the Sky Goddess of the red haired Isis, who was Sumeria's Nanana. The Angel Gabriel reemerges as the final Koran teacher of Mohammed.

 

Also very important here is who was pursuing the Holy Family shortly after the birth of Jesus. Not King Herod as he died soon after the Full Blood Moon of 1 A.D., not the Quarter Blood Moon which the Roman historian Josephus incorrectly stated, and so mis dated the death f Herod and the birth of Christ by as many as (7) years. King Fergus of Cathu was at the peak of his power with international contacts and spies and agents (knight errands) abroad! He was so in power until his war with the Trinobantes in 6 A.D., that the Romans intervened then to have him replaced! That was 7 A.D., and Fergus was replaced by the son of Nesse and Oengus, who was Erwain renamed Concho bar mac Nesse. It all fits and works...

 

When word circulated by traders of this change through the net work of Seers and the extended family members of Joseph in Judea, the pursuit of Deichtine (Mary) was ended, as she was no longer the business of that ousted monarch. The confusion of the dates of when Jesus was born was a great way of weakening the belief He was real at all. It also covered up that King Herod had killed an earlier truly Jewish Messiah born around 3 B.C., found as he was then by the Magi. He would have been killed almost the same month as Jesus was born. Knowing that Fergus was not the Holy Family they were able to return from Egypt or perhaps Ethiopia. Jesus emerges on the steps of the Temple already schooled enough in the scriptures then, to hold His own with the rabbis there. Later, Deidre takes Jesus (Dje Santi) back to Scotland. From there on His own he emerges at the court of Oengus and Nesse and their son Erwain, or Concho bar mac Nesse..

While pointing out scrambles and confusion, a major one in Irish lore is this next one, and I think it was intentional, secretly church sponsored. Irish lore substitutes the villain of King Fergus with the good king of Concho bar mac Ness. Constantly even. In as much as Concho bar was born the same year as was Jesus, it is bizarre that they have the boy Concho bar doing what Fergus had been doing, some times even before Concho bar was born. There is good reason to believe this scrambling was to disguise who was who, and that ultimately, the Cathu 'Woman of Sorrow' was the same as the Church's 'Woman of Sorrow', Mary!

 

After his anger had subsided and he realized what he had done, the guilt and sadness John must have felt must have been very great. In deed, he would become John the Baptist, the 'reformed sinner'. Using the king's bejeweled cup to 'baptize' Jews not allowed in the temple, while urging them to change their name and escape Judea as it was their 'End Times', also preaching the heretical message to Jews that the temple was Not needed to have a relationship with God, nor were rabbis or the priests. In chapter on John and the World Flood Calendar we can clearly understand what he thought was going to happen perhaps by our

year 70 A.D., and so his zealous 'end times preaching then.

 

And actually John and Jesus were right in their warnings and their expectations of an 'end times'. Because we now know that for the people then, they happened! Judea and Celtic Britain were absolutely destroyed by the Romans by or before 70 A.D.. Even the city of Rome was greatly consumed by fires during Nero's reign, fires which may well have been set by radical 'Christians' who not only believed it was the end of the word time, but were encouraging it to bring back Jesus! This was not the last time we have seen this human behavior, as even today's Isis and other Moslem movements have this kind of belief and agenda!

 

The alignments of Leo and Orion and the Earth's solstices, were such that like the Galactic Alignment of 2012/13, they would not happen again for another 13,000 years. But many Sky Watchers then feared that the terrible results which did happen in the earlier Galactic Alignment of the subsequent Great World Flood around 10,987 B.C. was or could happen in the year 70 AD., in the Gates Closing Year. I will make this hypothesis about John and the Book of Revelations which so aptly described the Galactic Alignment of 10,987 B.C. and its awful events which accompanied it. John the Father of the 'Twins', and who was expelled from Cathu Britain and was residing by the library of ancient scrolls of Cum Ram, he was the

John 'the Pappas', that there was not a 'John of Pappas'. John the Father wrote or dictated what emerged as the Book of Revelations, with exact astrological and astronomy coordinates if you will, of the projected Galactic Alignment of 2012/13.... Nothing was so well known by advanced Sky Watchers than the timing of that epoch horrible event. We know now that the Nine Beings used that alignment event to time the final placement of their Moon, in its orbit around the Earth. The 780/1560 year metronomes then began.

 

In John's mind, he would have expected that the 'Hand of God or the Gods', was going to strike the Jews down and End their world there, if they didn't realize their Covenant Period for the Promised Lands had ended. Yet, he was right....the 'Hand of the Gods' came in the form of the destruction of Judea, Jerusalem and the Temple, by the Romans, who were Very conscious of the Promised Lands Calendar, and that it was their turn for the 'taking' by a New People, to have and to hold the Lease Hold on those lands!

 

To the Romans, it was not myth but reality, that Saturn and Jupiter ruled the lands known today as Syria and the Holy Lands, and that Rome was agent on Earth for those Gods, along with him of Vengeance, the God Mars. Just as Geb and Gabriel was based on a real historic person of the 4th and 5th Dynasty times of Egypt, so was Mars. He was also known as Moloch, Miles, Malice, Millisi, Mere, and Mere Lew. He had a legion of names and they were as he said, 'based on what he did'! Like Nim Rod was another one of them, as was Narmer. Yes, the God of War and Vengeance was En Uma Sin, the God and Strong Cat (Lion) of Umma, the capital city of Mesopotamia....hence Narmer Sin. And who was the first king of Rome? He was named Numa Pompous, and he instituted for the first time then the 365.23 day calendar.

 

Mean while back in the time of Jesus, I expect that the other brother Joseph of Ul Mathea, was the one who took care of finding a contact in Judea for 'Mary', to take her in when she arrived in Judea. From one Joseph to another, the widower who was contacted by the Seers net work of contacts and travelers, was named Saultim by Irish lore, but Josephtef by Cambrian, and Joseph in the Bible. Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus. This is important as it is that father who would circumcise the male baby and thus bring him into the Jewish Covenant of Abraham, as a Jew, like Christian baptism in later years.

In both lore accounts, Saultim and Josephtef was considered a Seer, a level before being a Druid! He may have been both a Jew and a carpenter, but he was also member of a net work of Seers, much as a person today may be a Christian on Sundays and also a Free Mason or some thing. It is significant that John did Not marry the widow of his dead brother, as was the traditional role then, and that John would later rant at King Herod for marrying the widow of his dead brother. Had John married 'Mary' (Deichtine) who knows how this story would have gone, or if it would have at all. John fled Britain as did also Deichtine, and he became known in lore as the Exiled Prince. For six years there after, both he and Deichtine were persued by agents of King Fergus, he for his head and she for her return. If a child of hers were found, it would have been killed and she also, as she was no longer the special Vestal Virgin.

 

Post the First Century Roman invasions and wars in Britain, the very people who would have connected Chu Hu Illone with Christ, were wiped out. The relics which Joseph of Ul Mathea of his brother John and his nephew Jesus had most likely been deposited in the Temple to Augustus in today's Colchester. That temple was re made and expanded by the Romans to be the Temple to Claudius, post 46 A.D..The original Temple was originally constructed with the men of Cathu under Roman supervision, with a young teen age Cuhuillone left behind to defend the town. The temple was destroyed by the Iceni in their revolt led by Queen Boudica in the 60s A.D. a part and parcel of the 'curtains being ripped and down' on this entire age. 

 

Even the Romans who had holed up with in the inner sanctum (the original basilica area) of the temple, were burned alive! Any relics including the king's stolen Cup used by John and then by Jesus at the Last Supper, would have been destroyed in this fire, or buried in the rubble. The temple was re built by the Romans and eventually fell into ruins, so that there is now the ruins of the Castle of Colchester on its area, with many of the Roman stones and pillars incorporated into the castle.  

 

What is remarkable is how little is actually known of Concho bar's 43 year life from after when he takes the sword as a boy and began his 36 year reign, to when he goes to Rome to seek their aid in a growing war between the Cathu and the Briganti in 42 A.D., and finally his death in battle with the Briganti in

43 A.D..May be it was the peace and prosperity he brought during his reign, which makes no marks in the history books, then or now.

 

Where was Cathu or Cathuvillany (village-people)? In the book by David Young the 'Conquest of Britain', the Cathuvillany lived north of the Thames River. They originally inhabited the areas we know now as Warwickshire, Northampton shire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Their capital was

today's St Albans. After their defeat by Julius Caesar in 54 BC, they agreed not to attack the Trinovantes, the tribe to the east that was friendly to Rome. The Roman Army then left Britain. However around 6 A.D. the Cathuvillany broke the treaty and absorbed the area of Essex where the Trinovantes lived. They also probably took over parts of south Suffolk too. The tribal capital of the Cathu then moved to Colchester. The Cathuvillany thus became the most powerful tribe in southern Britain, reigning for nearly 40 years.

 

Note that in 6 A.D. King Fergus attacked the Trinovantes and defeated them. Rome would have responded to this affront, and 'lo and behold' we have the young boy Erwain, the son of Nesse and Oengus the Seer, being installed 'for a year', as the new king. He was able to stay on as king but note the timing of this event vis a vis actual Roman-British history, how the lore ties in completely in the time line. He is born year in

1 A.D. and at age (7) accepts the sword of rule at the Stone at Sterling, Scotland.

 

The other thing of note here is the name and people who were the Trinovantes. This people was the first to seek peace and alliance with Julius Caesar. They are the ones who gifted to him our 365.23 day solar based annual calendar, which Augustus later instituted in 30 B.C., adding the two months of July and August. But their origin story is what is also most interesting. They claimed to have been the New Troy ones, survivors of the Trojan War. They said they arrived in Britain after being defeated by the Pair of Og and mac Og, two 'giants', along with their armies of Hellenes. Arriving in Britain by the Channel from France, they routed other such giants who also arrived in Britain about that time, after their defeat at Egypt by Ram Seti 111rd (She Shack), some arriving with their sword hands cut off. But there may have been a time when the Trinobantes were the masters of southern Britain. A 'giant' by the way, may have been a person who was much above the five feet or so height of many peoples then, as in the six footers which occurred among the Celts and some Nordics, and as so many peoples in the west (America) are today.

But, their lore confirms the reality that there was a Troy, and that the Danoi of Ochy Och and Och Ulles or Achilles, were real and a terrifying force then. Ochy Och became Joshua Achilles David or Danovous. As David re named the city he took of Jerusalem, in 1003 B.C., so the Trojan War was fought around the 1014 B.C. area. Og or Ochy Och was Joshua, in an incredible softening of syllables. Together Og and mac Og are very significant in my Age 3 Book, and their acts are a real 'missing link' for a lot that happened then, from events beginning in China, and then the Pacific and Peru, to Europe and Greece (Ochy Och) and Israel, and finally, later to the founding and forming of what became Rome. The brother of Ochy Och? You know him well as Pharaoh Seti 1st, or not so well as Pele Seti...He fathered Ram Seti 11nd and I do suspect there was an earlier founding of a 'Rama' in Italy, atop the Palatine Hills. One other thing, it was and is Ram Seti, and not the circa 19th century PC correct change to 'Ramses'.

 

But let us return to Mary's son and the birth of Jesus, and the events before and after that great event. Firstly, Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus and Thomas, which meant he may not have done the circumcision of them. There is No record of it being done! The mother of Jesus was not Jewish and as a foreigner would have been known as a 'Pheoneci'. As Celts and not Greeks they would have moved to the region for them, of Galilee. and Jesus and Thomas would have known as Pan Cheri or Love Childs.

 

Nazareth or Nesse Roth would have been a Celtic town friendly to them, while Jesus had to avoid Bethlehem, the site of the Deaths of the Innocents under King Herod. As Mary and child were Not Jewish, they were not victims of the harsh Mosaic laws in regards to 'bastard' births, and an un married mother giving them birth, or a widow's brother not marrying her. Jesus and Thomas were not Jews, although as men learned of the scriptures, they could be 'rabbis' or 'teachers', but not Jewish priests. The Lobo which taught Romulus and Remis, the Pair who founded a pre 8th C.B.C. 'Rome', were taught by a 'Rabi'.   

 

An earlier 'chosen babe', whose birth was inadvertently told of to King Herod by the Three Magi from Como Magea, was born in the 3 B.C. time area. That babe, along with all other babes born in Bethlehem then, were killed on the orders of the paranoid and ruthless King Herod. Herod was obsessed with his retaining his throne and as the mega builder and ego maniac that he was, he perhaps secretly envisioned him self the 'messiah'! Herod had no compunction to having his favored wife significantly named 'Mary Ana' killed, along with their rabbi son whom she had begun to proffer as the awaited for messiah.

 

Through out the Jesus story, even after His Ascension, when all sorts of interpretations of Him and His story and message arose both immediately, and then for centuries there after, this was originally a very human story! That's not to say that Jesus was not really resurrected and then ascended by 'super natural' beings and their technology, but it is to say that the human side of this story is full of human mistakes, coincidences, and random events and occurrences. 'Christianity' it self, has always been the 'miracle' of Jesus and His life, whether the story of His life was re formed and contrived, or not. But certainly, the time around 3 B.C. to 1 A.D.  was a time of serious astrology and astronomy events, as both Jupiter and Saturn did a series of conjunctions, just as the planets and the Star Regulas collected in the sign of Leo, and as planet Venus, in the Sign of Aries the Ram, also made significant alignments, according to observers.

 

Similar such astronomy events do happen about every 180 years, when the planets align in a corner of the 'sky'. One such event was in early 1980. But, un like in the time of Christ, media and covert deep state 'government' effort s were made, to mock the significance of the event then. I know as I personally was interested in it and felt the sting of the official public mockery of its significance. The CIA also shut down interest and study in Cycles in human activities, like wars, and more. I myself saw the CIA man from Virginia, collecting the files of research materials of Ned Dewey's Foundation for the Study of Cycles, which were all carted away as soon as he was deceased. So to me, the 1980 Alignment of the Major Planets, unlike the one (10) Cycles earlier around 1 A.D. which marked a Birth, this one marked a Death, that of Free America. They of the CIA and the FBI et al, have been at work killing America and its special ness every day, from assassinating people, to smothering knowledge, to lying about every thing, always.

There was one agency that knew of and used the Alignment, and that was NASA. They sent the Voyager space probes out in 1977 in order to use the lining up of the planets as a means to 'sling shot' them from one planet to the next further out. By 1982 they were successful in reaching and observing all the planets!.

 

 

Any ways, the word name Chu Hu Illone was not only describing the one Hero of Jesus (Setanti), but the other member of the Pair, His 'Twin'. The Chu word was Tchu or 'Two...with Thomas the other 'dog' or 'companion of god'. In fact, the name Thomas is based on the word 'two one' or 'twin', he was 'Twin'. He was per the bible separated from his mother and brother Jesus at birth, and handed over to the 'older woman', to be taken away with. I believe the older woman was Fernchoem the young mother of Deichtine (Mary), who was also made pregnant by the 'Longas', John! She bore Thomas and took care of him then.

 

Thomas only appears in the Red Branch and Roman history, after King Concho bar of Cathu Villainy is killed by a battle in 43 A.D..He may have had a head injury and died subsequently, but he died in this time from the battle wound. Thomas is there in Britain, evidently having left Judea just after the death of Christ on the cross. He was even per lore, blamed for bringing the bad news of the death of the Hero Cuhuillone, to the people and king of the Cathu, and so causing the king to expire of his head battle wound then.

 

Thomas was by his different up bringing and travels an 'out sider' to these people, for one thing he could read and write. He took possession of the Lion of John which either Jesus had brought there in His earlier extended trip to Spain, which was recorded in the Bible. Or, Thomas took the lion with him from Judea on his trip to Britain. Incredibly, the Romans were transporting lions and other wild animals as a matter of course, then. The Romans knew all of these Royals well, confirming the lore as history. I just wonder if they knew who Jesus really was, in the context of a Celtic court member with strong ties to the rulers.

 

Indeed, place your self in the 'sandals' of the Romans. On the one hand Jesus may have secretly been their Mithra Bull Man, their sacrifice in their regained Jerusalem, the Pagan 'fire works' to start their Promised Lands Covenant period of owner ship. On the other hand, news was just arriving of a battle taking place in Britain, between the Cathu and the Briganti peoples, the Cathu led by Rome's 'Arthur' Concho bar. What then or who was Jesus? Was He seeking to form a revolution and a second front against Rome, even to having Himself named 'King of the Jews', while over throwing Rome's puppet king line of the Herods?

The Romans crowned Jesus with a crown of thorns and covered Him with a Centurions red robe, all of which by the way shows up in the Mithra reenactment of the Bull fight, the matador in red and the Bull with a crown of garlings atop his, head between his horns. May be they saw Him in Both or All ways,

as the Warrior, the Priest, and now the King' as a Danovous.

 

The Year 43 A.D. was the pivotal turning time for the world then in the context of the 130 year demy cycle....what while sunny and optimistic in the first (72) years became in the 73rd year (43 A.D.) suddenly dark and pessimistic, the Cup half Full becomes half Empty. The Romans may have taken the charges against Him seriously in 43 A.D., even fashioning a wooden sign naming Him the 'King of the Jews'.

Mean while, Concho bar who was known by the Romans as Cunobeline, the Cymbeline of Shakespeare, after his death of his two sons of Togodumnus and Caratacus, Togodumnus the elder son, inherited his father’s kingdom. His brother Caratacus immediately set out to conquer other tribes of southern England. Some how Togodumnus is killed, and Rome by some accounts as bizarre as they are, began promoting the new arrival court member of the 'one with the Lion' of Thomas the Twin, as their next Rex Britanicus.

If you think of it, this one piece of history invalidates the entire church story of a humble simple Jesus!

In any case, Caratacus did a sacrifice of a Righteous Man, by having him pulled apart by horses. Thomas with his Lion fled Britain to the main land and continued East with people later mis identifying him as Jesus, going all the way to China, and by some accounts, across the Pacific to Peru and eventually back to Ireland and Europe. The Romans in this time were known in the Americas, their leader of Caesar Augustus was the Saragossa or Great White Buffalo, instead of the Bull in the west. Romans brought trade, things.  

 

Thomas did become a great hero to the Irish, when around 50 A.D. via the Atlantic Ocean, coming from the West, he arrived from his around the world trip, going East all the way. He brought with him much wealth and some be feathered natives from the Americas, and only passed through Ireland to the east coast to embark back to Europe, with permission from a series of chiefs, who recorded this event in their lore. DNA evidence has surfaced among long time residents of Ireland of Native American lineage. To the Romans in 43/44 A.D., Thomas was of the 'Court and could read and write, and had the Lion of Kingship with him, so they tried to install him as their Rex Britanicus, at the death of Concho bar. The people revolted proffering Togodumnus, who was immediately some how killed.

 

The Roman wars and invasions then began in earnest. And by 70 A.D. Celtic Britain was subjugated, and by 470 A.D., was gone for ever. The revolt and war of the Cathu against the Romans, which brought Emperor Claudius to lead an invasion of Britain with War Elephants, had begun. The second son of Concho bar of Caracas was defeated and fled to Briganti, to Queen Cartimandua, or Gwen Eve! She betrayed him and turned him back over to the Romans. She was the same Queen who had divorced and expelled King Venuci, a brother of Nesse, who was the mother of Concho bar. Concho bar went to war with against the Briganti for his uncle Venuci. It IS a sensible story, of cause and effect and family royal ties and so alliances...and of how Celtic Briton was destroyed and turned into a Roman colony by 45 A.D., remaining so for the next 365 years till 410 A.D.. Synchronicity but by whom, the 'Twins' or the Romans? 

 

Until post 43 A.D., the Cathu people had never actually been defeated and subdued by the Romans. And,

I wonder if that was in the mind of Jesus when on trial He in effect referred to 'if in His place among His people, He could summon superior forces even to Rome's'. Bible interpreters believe He was talking of a 'heavenly host' and today some interpret it as a reference to an 'extra terrestrial military'. I think He was thinking of the once powerful Cathu Celts! Post 43 A.D., in the Roman Wars led under Emperor Claudius, the Cathu people were for the first time, ultimately defeated. Other defeats were dealt the tribes of Britain there after, the final defeat of the Brits coming by 70 A.D. under Vespasian. In deed, after the failure of their nation wide revolt and war against Rome, led by Queen Boudica of the Iceni, the Brits were utterly defeated. Britain became non Celtic area, a refuge for Jews moved out of Judea in the holocaust there of 70 A.D., and again with the defeat of the last revolt of the Jews led by Bar Kochba, circa 132 to 135 A.D..

 

                                            A Young Jesus on the Steps of the Temple.

 

The recorded appearances of Jesus are always not inside the Great Temple, but on the steps as a juvenile, and then at the entrance way with the money changers, and finally as a guest of the Jewish rabbi Peter, to his home temple, out side the city. He was not a priest but a rabbi (teacher) and not allowed to preach inside. This may have been a 'bone of contention' for Him, as He was dismissing the priests as 'in the way'.

 


 

While Jesus stayed in Galilee long enough to be later recalled as the carpenter's son, His next relocation took Him back to Britain! In deed, a second wave of lore emerged about a decade after the disappearance of King Fergus from the throne, of the return of the escaped Vestal Virgin of great beauty. Word and lore spread across Pagan Britain like a tabloid scandal story!

This time lore correctly says the young King Concho bar did want to see her, and like Fergus before him, had agents seek her out and report of her appearances. They gave such unflattering reports that she was now a woman of her late 20s perhaps nearing 30 years of age, and not the timeless goddess they had been led to believe by the bards. His interest waned completely. But, Mary (Deichtine) still had to have been fearful of being taken prisoner by the court of the Cathu people, despite it now being ruled by then by Concho bar mac Nesse. Her visit back to Britain may solely have been to deliver Jesus there, and it may have been even more involved. Lore from the beginning existed that she had had a family by her husband Naoise, and a daughter named Aebgreine. This was before Naoise's death and her flight to Judea. Was Deidre (Mary) back o make contact with her and any other child she may have had? Was Aebgreine located in the town of Setanti, and was she and Jesus introduced as brother and sister there. Was she the one who emerged as His constant female consort in the young Cuhuillone Red Branch lore? I say yes.

 

This page has a 1st Century map of Britain, according to Roman historians of the time. For Rome it was absolutely important to know the names and where abouts of the different 'kingdoms' of Britain. A 'Rex Britanicus' was first established by Julius Caesar in the 50s B.C., as one who held with the Romans the temporary position and title, which set him above the rest of the tribal chiefs under Roman subjugation.

The 1st century Roman Caesars especially, communicated with and through this 'Rex Britanicus', who would have been a member of the Round Table of the Twelve Knights of Roma, under Caesar Augustus. King Herod of Syria was another such knight. The only Queen recognized by the Romans in the First Century and perhaps ever in their 520 year history with Britain, was that one of both history and legend of Queen Eve or Gweneve, or Cartimandua, who ruled the Brigantes north of the Thames River, from the 30s A.D. to her ouster and demise by 69 or 70 A.D., again, in that year time of the 'Open Door Closing',

 

                                  

 

 

                 

I now bring to your attention that per the Cuhuillone Cycles the original name of Jesus was 'Setanti'...

And if you look closely at the map the previous page, in the Brigantes realm, to the west coast, you will see the town or people of Setanti. It had to have been an advantageous staging and receiving area for shipping and trade on the Atlantic side. When Cuhuillone (Jesus) as a juvenile came to the court of King Concho bar mac Nesse of Cathu, He came as an Out Sider, a non member of the Cathu tribe and people. He fought his way in by defending Himself against the other young warrior trainees in their camp, who sought to kill him for arriving as He did unannounced. By proving Himself in that way, the King and his advisor Oengus, granted Him access 'to learn from all the chiefs, what ever knowledge they possessed'.

 

Indeed, this was a Death Sentence for this Upstart! For Oengus (Merlin) was sending Him on the path to become the 'well educated and well traveled person of virtue'....that He may be a best sacrifice when the tribe needed or wanted to sacrifice, of a Righteous Man (or Woman,) especially as He had red or auburn hair. Thomas the Twin fled Britain because he knew he was a candidate to be kidnapped and 'quartered' as a Righteous Man, by the Cathu son of Concho bar, who had just started a war with Rome.

 

I think Christ would have lived His life knowing this, that at some time and place He would either be asked to sacrifice Himself or be taken and forced to, as a Righteous Man. A pivotal event of Christ being at Cathu Britain, besides His arrival to the court there, was His defense of the Cathu village, while all of the 1200 able bodied men were away building a great structure. That structure was the building of the original temple to Caesar Augustus while he was still alive, although near the end of his life and reign. The inner temple had what became the 1560 sq ' Basilica measurements of the 60 feet times the 26 feet wide. Note, that the measurements are in Feet of (12) inches, as the foot, the inch, the mile measurement system was once world wide. The institution of the meter in Europe was a part of the One World Order process. The 10 meters is a 'Chain' of (33) Feet of (12) inches. Each 33 foot depth in water is equal to a barometric pressure of (1). The Foot system was and is a gift from the 'Gods', as the metric a dump made by evil men.

 

Any ways, during the building of the temple by the Celts of Cathu for the Romans, their town was attacked by another tribe. Jesus who was taller than most at almost six feet tall per the Shroud of Turin, was able to rally towns folk and by dint of His own arms, was able to defend the town. He became the Hero of the local Cathu people as a result of this act of bravery and perhaps brute strength. The Red Branch is also quite explicit that Cuhuillone had a terrible temper and when in battle (!) His appearances changed and He became contorted. He would get so angry! If you read a little between the lines in the Bible, like His attack on the Temple Money Changers, He stood His ground at every challenge, first using His mind and words.

 

The accounts of Cuhuillone become very sketchy after this time. Was He a warrior knight for a couple of decades, perhaps accompanying His uncle Joseph on Tin Merchant business, afar? The near end of His story in Britain is the result of a Dual He fought and won. Some how He inadvertently caused the death of some one He really loved and was close to and soon leaves never to return. Was this really about His 'dual' with His father John over the crowds at Judea, told and related to the Brits? I suspect that Jesus only learned of John being his father only days before or even after he was arrested, and then soon be headed, perhaps a result of their 'dual' to attract and retain followings. As the Eclipse time of 43 A.D. was approaching, Jesus the Righteous Man that He was, became busy in 'stirring things' up, making the 'waves' necessary to assure His timed arrest and death by stoning or on the cross.

 

I think the Time Architecture Operatives knew the event of His crucifixion was going to happen and may be a rendition of 'our' history, or with certain pivotal junctures and turning points and events in it, different possible 'renditions' of it. Different events like say the sinking of the Titanic or the arrival of Christopher Columbus are 'played' over and over again. So, it was very first day that He was in that tomb that He was gone, not any three days later. It happened while the winds and after shocks were still going on and people had sought cover. That was when Jesus was 'beamed up', by technology, assisted as it may have been by two Beings, seen by an eye witness named Stephen. He soon became the First Martyr for Christianity. Jesus the man was either some how revived and repaired, or as shocking as it may seem, He was replaced with a 'double' of Him, using 3D technology developing today as I write. Either way, 'He' soon appeared back on earth, doing the one thing which made Jesus the Founder of a New Religion, His having seemed to have escaped death. With out the death and Resurrection and His Re appearance on earth for those

(40) days, He was just another great person with a Message, who 'came and went' like the rest of us.

                         

 

                                                   Jesus and the Temple Money Changers!

 

I happen to believe and think also, that the Shroud of Turin was made by the body of Jesus, when in the process of His being 'removed' by an advanced technology, which caused Him to be mostly levitated off the ground. Initiation of this act of removing Him, caused a fluid flash event with the shroud covering Him. While wiped clean no one had come in and put honey on Him for the burial, it was as if He had been hurriedly brought in to the tomb and left there, as the earth quakes and winds were on people's priorities. Again, the earth quake during the eclipse was a 'meaningful coincidence'. A man named Stephen who witnessed the Ascent was stoned to death for saying so, as Saul later named Paul, was said to have watched and held his garment. I date this event and the start of St. Paul's important Church ministry as soon after the crucifixion as to be still in the year 43 A.D.. Paul and Peter and others were executed in the 60s A.D., two decades or more after the year 43 A.D. and not 32/3 A.D. per church.

 

I believe the Shroud of Turin was and is real, and was a result of Jesus being Beamed up and out of the tomb and up into a craft, manned by very intelligent Beings, who knew exactly what they were doing and what the results would be to us in our history since then! The Resurrection or not, was a pivotal turning point, and that it happened man kind received a world religion with a genuinely Good message, one in which no one was required to be killed or be sacrificed...bread, wine, and fish. Look at the next page at the face of Jesus per the Shroud of Turin, I think just after He was brought away from the 'X Cross' that the Romans would have used...leaned as it had been against a tree, not hung from a tree.

 

The hair is white and fresh blood was still on His head and in His hair. This man is Dead, His eyes firmly closed. No one should make the case He was brought away from the cross alive. His nose may have been broken by the Centurions instead of His ankles, which if the ankles are broken makes His removal from the cross and area all the more difficult. Again His hair is white as will a red haired person's hair will be at age 43, I know. Not so a black haired. His head is very long and narrow, His chin mustache divided, a sign of a Mithra initiate or priest. His brow was very thick. To me He does not look 'Semitic', or entirely so. But, He could pass as a fighting man, a boxer even, and not the 'mellow yellow' one so often portrayed. Not politically correct some may say, but this is my Book of Truth as I see it.

                                    The Head and Face of Jesus, per the Shroud of Turin.

 

                                  

 

 

The next page is a Catholic portrayal of the Crucifixion, shown and incredibly titled by the Church as the '5th Sorrow of the Mary'. In deed, did the church quietly accept that Mary was Deidre in the Red Branch cycles, known there as the 'Woman of Sorrow'? The last earthly event of Jesus was the Crucifixion, and it is befitting that it was that scene in the life story of Jesus became the 5th Sorrow of Mary, apropos as it was the 5th Age of the Tree of Life, or certainly the 5th House of Pisces and the Church of Christ era..

 

                              The 'Fifth Sorrow of Mary, Jesus Dies on the Cross.

 

                                   

 

I think the answer of whom Jesus kissed on the lips and showed great affection to was the woman the savvy Nesse (Mary Magdalin) would have brought with her, on her trip to see John the Exiled Prince, and Jesus the Hero of Cathu. I refer to the consort of Christ all of His adult life, of His half sister Aebgreine, Fiona in the Red Branch cycles. She would have been in her mid forties like Christ and had had deep ties and history and understanding of Him. I can not yet prove this and may be it is un provable, but for me it confirms my theory that the dual which Jesus won, but which caused His opponent (John His father), to be killed, was that dual fought over and for the crowds at Judea. and that He did not dual and kill a beloved one in Britain.

 

What was this dual I refer to? John was offering the Re Birth of a person from a dipping under the healing waters of the River Jordan, and the poring over his head of that water from the bejeweled and probably dazzling Cup in John's possession, the King's drinking cup which he had taken with him from Britain! Jesus on the other hand, physically healed sick people, especially on the Sabbaths, and He taught what may have been a radical idea for the common folk, that there was an After Life when we are departed, and the more humble a person's circumstances the better chance of entering that after life.

 

In fact, what I see as a great tell in this, is when Jesus began saying to followers of John, who having lost him now hesitated in following Jesus instead, as the newer arrival, and not with all of the drama which I am sure zealot John provided. The message of Jesus then becomes to Follow Him as to do so they would re gain 'company' with 'His father in heaven' of John! This was 'wild', but we really don't know what thee people were expecting to happen. Was the esoteric idea of the Open Gate with its astronomical events, become then to be the expectation of a Rapture, a rupture in the steady line of history? 

 

The church had to re interpret this, that Jesus was referring to not His 'father John in Heaven', but to the All Father in Heaven, the Creator of the Universe Father, and that Jesus was proclaiming Himself to be the Son of the All father in heaven. I contend that He was living in the context of His local surroundings and His own events, and that He felt He had to make this incredibly bold connection and message in order to keep and grow His followings, and to keep His disciples....for the soon to happen Eclipse and Passover, which was to be , had to be Christ's final act of message deliverance. 

 

The Disciples mean while, at this time, began arguing as to what position at the Table of Jesus and the Father, would they be seated when what ever rapture' event they were expecting to happen, had happened! The closer to Christ and the Father, the higher their position. It was an all human story, elevated by the event of His 'resurrection and return', and then many conceptions and misconceptions by those in Jerusalem, and by Paul, and then by the church martyrs, and founders and authors. It worked!

 

We must now move on to a higher understanding of us in this universe, and of those also here before us....and instead of the Priests in the way smothering us and hoarding knowledge and developments, we must get the Deep State governments out of the way of us. Their fears and hold on power is what motivates them. But, it is our bodies and souls and minds, which are our responsibilities and not theirs, which they are keeping down, and away from their full realization. .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About the author

Who am I? Born in Boston MA and brought up by my parents Joseph and Mary Anna Foley in Brookline, and then Dedham, MA..History is my world of facts and dates, for decades I sought to find Cycles in the economy, stock market, to the silk trade from ancient times to the rise and fall of empires. view profile

Published on November 11, 2019

90000 words

Genre: Christian

Enjoyed this review?

Get early access to fresh indie books and help decide on the bestselling stories of tomorrow. Create your free account today.

or

Or sign up with an email address

Create your account

Or sign up with your social account